Top Five Global Oil and Gas Well Completion and Production Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis,December 2012
The global oil and gas well completion and production industry experienced robust growth over the last five years and is expected to reach approximately US $177.6 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 7.3% over the next five years. Companies in the industry have embraced technology-driven products, services and system strategies, and the top players use their own sales and marketing channels to serve the market in most cases.
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the global oil and gas well completion and production companies and presents its findings in “Top Five Global Oil and Gas Well Completion and Production Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.” The report provides detailed insight into the performance of the top five companies. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among the peer group, and in which areas, and therefore clarifies leading performance standards and the strengths and weaknesses of companies covered.
As indicated in the study, the global oil and gas well completion and production industry reached an estimated $115.5 billion in 2011, growing at a CAGR of 13.8% during the last five years. The industry is fragmented. The Rest of the World region dominates this market and represents 32.2% of the global market. A combination of factors such as strong oil prices and higher customer spending is seen to affect market dynamics significantly. In this study, Lucintel profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global oil and gas well completion and production companies industry. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the global oil and gas well completion and production companies and presents its findings in “Top Five Global Oil and Gas Well Completion and Production Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.” The report provides detailed insight into the performance of the top five companies. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among the peer group, and in which areas, and therefore clarifies leading performance standards and the strengths and weaknesses of companies covered.
As indicated in the study, the global oil and gas well completion and production industry reached an estimated $115.5 billion in 2011, growing at a CAGR of 13.8% during the last five years. The industry is fragmented. The Rest of the World region dominates this market and represents 32.2% of the global market. A combination of factors such as strong oil prices and higher customer spending is seen to affect market dynamics significantly. In this study, Lucintel profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
- Baker Hughes Inc.
- Halliburton
- National Oilwell Varco Inc.
- Schlumberger Ltd.
- Weatherford International Ltd.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global oil and gas well completion and production companies industry. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON BAKER HUGHES INC.
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON HALLIBURTON
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO INC.
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON SCHLUMBERGER LTD.
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON BAKER HUGHES INC.
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON HALLIBURTON
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO INC.
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON SCHLUMBERGER LTD.
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
LIST OF FIGURES AND CHARTS
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas well completion and production market
Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry opportunity by region
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five oil and gas well completion and production companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five oil and gas well completion and production companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.1: Baker Hughes Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Baker Hughes Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Baker Hughes Inc. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Baker Hughes Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Baker Hughes Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Figure 6.1: Halliburton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Halliburton
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.16: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Halliburton SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Halliburton productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Halliburton fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.1: National Oilwell Varco Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. l (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.16: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of National Oilwell Varco Inc. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: National Oilwell Varco Inc. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: National Oilwell Varco Inc. fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.1: Schlumberger Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Schlumberger Ltd. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Schlumberger Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Schlumberger Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.1: Weatherford International Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Weatherford International Ltd. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Weatherford International Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Weatherford International Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas well completion and production market
Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas well completion and production industry opportunity by region
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five oil and gas well completion and production companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five oil and gas well completion and production companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.1: Baker Hughes Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Baker Hughes Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Baker Hughes Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Baker Hughes Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Baker Hughes Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Baker Hughes Inc. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Baker Hughes Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Baker Hughes Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Figure 6.1: Halliburton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Halliburton
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs DuPont 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.16: Halliburton trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Halliburton SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Halliburton productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Halliburton fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.1: National Oilwell Varco Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. l (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs National Oilwell Varco Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.16: National Oilwell Varco Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of National Oilwell Varco Inc. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: National Oilwell Varco Inc. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: National Oilwell Varco Inc. fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.1: Schlumberger Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Schlumberger Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Schlumberger Ltd. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Schlumberger Ltd. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Schlumberger Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Schlumberger Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.1: Weatherford International Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Weatherford International Ltd.(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Weatherford International Ltd. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Weatherford International Ltd. R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Weatherford International Ltd. productivity: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Weatherford International Ltd. capital investment value: 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global oil and gas well completion and production industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global oil and gas well completion and production companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five oil and gas well completion and production companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.1: Market served: Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Table 6.1: Market served – Halliburton
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Halliburton
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.1: Market served – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.1: Market served – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global oil and gas well completion and production industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global oil and gas well completion and production companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five oil and gas well completion and production companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.1: Market served: Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Baker Hughes Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Baker Hughes Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Table 6.1: Market served – Halliburton
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Halliburton
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.1: Market served – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – National Oilwell Varco Inc.
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.1: Market served – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Schlumberger Ltd.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Schlumberger Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Weatherford International Ltd.
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Weatherford International Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
