Top Five Global Aluminum Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis, October 2013
The global aluminum industry during the next five years would be driven not only by existing applications, but by creating avenues towards new applications, such as aluminum-lithium for automotive and aerospace industries. The industry experienced good growth over the last five years and is expected to continue its growth momentum over the next five years (2012-2017). Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the top five global aluminum companies and presents its findings in “Top Five Global Aluminum Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.
The report provides detailed insight into the performance of the top five companies across the world. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among the peer group and in which areas, and thus clarifies leading performance standards and the strengths and weaknesses of the companies covered.
The global aluminum industry is primarily engaged in manufacturing of primary aluminum which is used for manufacturing ingots, sheets, bars, billets, etc. In this study, Lucintel thoroughly profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
Alcoa Inc. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited BHP Billiton Rio Tinto Group United Company RUSAL Plc.
As per the study, the industry experienced significant growth of 27% during 2010-2011 due to increasing application of aluminum in new industries and for making aluminum alloys. The global demand for aluminum has rebounded to 2008 levels. APAC depicted the most potential market during last five years. The growing markets of China and India will continue to witness aluminum industry growth, higher demand from key consuming end user markets, such as construction, automotive, consumer durables, and packaging.
This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a competitive benchmarking of the world’s top five aluminum companies. The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, and capabilities and strategies of the leaders. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data, analysis and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plan.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in top five global aluminum companies. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
Features of This Report:
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's top five global aluminum companies, we have thoroughly profiled following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
Alcoa Inc. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited BHP Billiton Rio Tinto Group United Company RUSAL Plc.
The detailed analysis of each company offers a critical view into key strategic areas, including:
Company overview Benchmarking (financial & market) SWOT analysis Product positioning Marketing strategy and tactics Corporate strategy
To make any investment, business or strategic decisions, you need adequate and timely information. This market report fulfills this core need. This is an indispensable reference guide for industry executives who are dealing global aluminum companies. Some of the features of this multi-client market intelligence report are:
The report provides detailed insight into the performance of the top five companies across the world. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among the peer group and in which areas, and thus clarifies leading performance standards and the strengths and weaknesses of the companies covered.
The global aluminum industry is primarily engaged in manufacturing of primary aluminum which is used for manufacturing ingots, sheets, bars, billets, etc. In this study, Lucintel thoroughly profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
As per the study, the industry experienced significant growth of 27% during 2010-2011 due to increasing application of aluminum in new industries and for making aluminum alloys. The global demand for aluminum has rebounded to 2008 levels. APAC depicted the most potential market during last five years. The growing markets of China and India will continue to witness aluminum industry growth, higher demand from key consuming end user markets, such as construction, automotive, consumer durables, and packaging.
This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a competitive benchmarking of the world’s top five aluminum companies. The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, and capabilities and strategies of the leaders. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data, analysis and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plan.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in top five global aluminum companies. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
Features of This Report:
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's top five global aluminum companies, we have thoroughly profiled following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
The detailed analysis of each company offers a critical view into key strategic areas, including:
To make any investment, business or strategic decisions, you need adequate and timely information. This market report fulfills this core need. This is an indispensable reference guide for industry executives who are dealing global aluminum companies. Some of the features of this multi-client market intelligence report are:
- Market size estimates in terms of (US $) value by segments of the global aluminum companies.
- Regional analysis: global aluminum breakdown by key regions (e.g., North America, Europe, APAC and ROW)
- Market trends, drivers, and forecasts
- Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial & market strength
- Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
- Product line overview and positioning of top players
- SWOT analysis of the leaders
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Corporate strategy
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON ALCOA INC.
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON ALUMINUM CORPORATION OF CHINA LIMITED
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON BHP BILLITON
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON RIO TINTO GROUP
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC.
LIST OF FIGURES AND CHARTS
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Figure 3.1: Supply aluminum industry
Figure 3.2: Global aluminum industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global aluminum industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global aluminum industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global aluminum industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global aluminum industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global aluminum industry opportunity by region
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Top five global aluminum industry – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global aluminum industry gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALCOA INC.
Figure 5.1: Alcoa Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Alcoa Inc.’s
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Alcoa Inc.’s against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Alcoa Inc.’s against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc.’s (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Alcoa Inc.’s (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc.’s 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc.2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs. Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Alcoa Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 US $M
Figure 5.16: Alcoa Inc. trend R&D expenses percentage of total sales in (U $M)
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Alcoa Inc. expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011 (%)
Figure 5.18: Alcoa Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Alcoa Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALUMINUM CORPORATION OF CHINA LIMITED
Figure 6.1: Aluminum Corporation of China Limited revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad –Aluminum Corporation of China Limited
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007- 2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007- 2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Aluminum Corporation of China Limited trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.16: Aluminum Corporation of China Limited trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (US $B)
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited R&D expenditure vs
top three & top five players average 2011 (%)
Figure 6.18: Delta Air Lines Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Delta Air Lines Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF BHP BILLITON
Figure 7.1: BHP Billiton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – BHP Billiton
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of BHP Billiton against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of BHP Billiton against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US$B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs. BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: BHP Billiton trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: BHP Billiton trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 7.17: Comparison of BHP Billiton R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: BHP Billiton productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: BHP Billiton fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF RIO TINTO GROUP
Figure 8.1: Rio Tinto Group revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Rio Tinto Group
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Rio Tinto Group against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Rio Tinto Group against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs. Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group 2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Rio Tinto Group trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Rio Tinto Group trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Rio Tinto Group R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011 (%)
Figure 8.18: Rio Tinto Group productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Rio Tinto Group fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC
Figure 9.1: United Company RUSAL plc revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – United Company RUSAL plc
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of United Company RUSAL plc against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of United Company RUSAL plc against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for. United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs. United Company RUSAL plc (2007- 2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs. United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs. United Company RUSAL plc 2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: United Company RUSAL plc trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: United Company RUSAL plc trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 9.17: Comparison of United Company RUSAL plc R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011(%)
Figure 9.18: United Company RUSAL plc productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: United Company RUSAL plc fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON ALCOA INC.
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON ALUMINUM CORPORATION OF CHINA LIMITED
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON BHP BILLITON
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON RIO TINTO GROUP
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC.
LIST OF FIGURES AND CHARTS
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Figure 3.1: Supply aluminum industry
Figure 3.2: Global aluminum industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global aluminum industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global aluminum industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global aluminum industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global aluminum industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global aluminum industry opportunity by region
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Top five global aluminum industry – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global aluminum industry gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALCOA INC.
Figure 5.1: Alcoa Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Alcoa Inc.’s
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Alcoa Inc.’s against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Alcoa Inc.’s against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc.’s (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Alcoa Inc.’s (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc.’s 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc.2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs. Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Alcoa Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Alcoa Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 US $M
Figure 5.16: Alcoa Inc. trend R&D expenses percentage of total sales in (U $M)
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Alcoa Inc. expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011 (%)
Figure 5.18: Alcoa Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Alcoa Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALUMINUM CORPORATION OF CHINA LIMITED
Figure 6.1: Aluminum Corporation of China Limited revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad –Aluminum Corporation of China Limited
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited(2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007- 2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited2007- 2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Aluminum Corporation of China Limited trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.16: Aluminum Corporation of China Limited trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (US $B)
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited R&D expenditure vs
top three & top five players average 2011 (%)
Figure 6.18: Delta Air Lines Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Delta Air Lines Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF BHP BILLITON
Figure 7.1: BHP Billiton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – BHP Billiton
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of BHP Billiton against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of BHP Billiton against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US$B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs. BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs BHP Billiton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: BHP Billiton trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: BHP Billiton trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 7.17: Comparison of BHP Billiton R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: BHP Billiton productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: BHP Billiton fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF RIO TINTO GROUP
Figure 8.1: Rio Tinto Group revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Rio Tinto Group
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Rio Tinto Group against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Rio Tinto Group against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs. Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group 2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Rio Tinto Group (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Rio Tinto Group trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Rio Tinto Group trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Rio Tinto Group R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011 (%)
Figure 8.18: Rio Tinto Group productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Rio Tinto Group fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC
Figure 9.1: United Company RUSAL plc revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – United Company RUSAL plc
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of United Company RUSAL plc against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of United Company RUSAL plc against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for. United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs. United Company RUSAL plc (2007- 2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs. United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs. United Company RUSAL plc 2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs United Company RUSAL plc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: United Company RUSAL plc trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: United Company RUSAL plc trend in R&D expenses percentage of total sales (%)
Figure 9.17: Comparison of United Company RUSAL plc R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011(%)
Figure 9.18: United Company RUSAL plc productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: United Company RUSAL plc fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global aluminum industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global aluminum manufacturers
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five global aluminum manufacturers
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALCOA INC.
Table 5.1: Market served – Alcoa Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Alcoa Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Alcoa Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALUMINUM CORPORATION OF CHINA LIMITED
Table 6.1: Market served – Aluminum Corporation of China Limited
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Aluminum Corporation of China Limited
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF BHP BILLITON
Table 7.1: Market served - BHP Billiton
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad –BHP Billiton
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of BHP Billiton against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF RIO TINTO GROUP
Table 8.1: Market served – Rio Tinto Group
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Rio Tinto Group
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Rio Tinto Group against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC.
Table 9.1: Markets served – United Company RUSAL plc.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – United Company RUSAL plc
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of United Company RUSAL plc against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global aluminum industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global aluminum manufacturers
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five global aluminum manufacturers
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALCOA INC.
Table 5.1: Market served – Alcoa Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Alcoa Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Alcoa Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF ALUMINUM CORPORATION OF CHINA LIMITED
Table 6.1: Market served – Aluminum Corporation of China Limited
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – Aluminum Corporation of China Limited
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Aluminum Corporation of China Limited against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF BHP BILLITON
Table 7.1: Market served - BHP Billiton
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad –BHP Billiton
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of BHP Billiton against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF RIO TINTO GROUP
Table 8.1: Market served – Rio Tinto Group
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Rio Tinto Group
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Rio Tinto Group against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF UNITED COMPANY RUSAL PLC.
Table 9.1: Markets served – United Company RUSAL plc.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – United Company RUSAL plc
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of United Company RUSAL plc against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
