European Markets for Wound and Tissue Management 2011

Date: October 22, 2010
Pages: 410
Price:
US$ 11,495.00
License [?]:
Publisher: iData Research Inc.
Report type: Strategic Report
Delivery: E-mail Delivery (PDF), Hard Copy Mail Delivery
ID: E4C11159440EN
Leaflet:

Download PDF Leaflet

European Markets for Wound and Tissue Management 2011
In 2009, the total European wound and tissue management markets were valued at nearly €2.3 billion. The European markets for wound and tissue management covers 15 countries in Europe including Austria, Benelux, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Scandinavia, Switzerland and the U.K.

This market includes the following segments:
  • Wound Closure
  • Advanced Dressings
  • Moist Dressings
  • Anti-Microbial Wound Dressings
  • Interactive Dressings
  • Hemostats
  • Anti-Adhesion
  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

The products can be divided into external, internal and combined wound management. In 2009, the combined devices represented the largest segment at 61.3%, followed by external devices. The European wound and tissue management market is expected to be driven by the increasing aging population, rising rates of obesity and diabetes as well as the increased efficiency of using the devices.

Within the European wound and tissue management market, companies such as ConvaTec, Covidien, Ethicon, KCI, Molnlycke and Smith & Nephew lead the market, among many others. This report provides a comprehensive and detailed analysis of market revenues by device type, market forecasts through 2016, unit sales, average selling prices, market drivers and limiters and a detailed competitive analysis, including manufacturer market shares and product portfolios.

The executive summary of this report is also available.
LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF CHARTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 TOTAL U.S. MIS SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET
1.2 SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET
1.3 FACET FIXATION MARKET
1.4 MIS INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET
1.5 MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET
1.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

2.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
2.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET

3.1 INTRODUCTION
    3.1.1.1 Spinous Process Fixation
    3.1.1.2 Facet Fixation
    3.1.1.3 Minimally Invasive Interbody Devices
    3.1.1.4 MIS Pedicle Screws
3.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
3.3 MARKET BY SEGMENT
3.4 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
3.5 MARKET DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
  3.5.1 Market Drivers
  3.5.2 Market Limiters
3.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
3.7 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

THE HUMAN SPINE

4.1 BASIC ANATOMY
4.2 SPINAL PATHOLOGY AND DISORDERS
  4.2.1 Overview
  4.2.2 Degenerative Disc Disease
    4.2.2.1 Disc Herniation
    4.2.2.2 Stenosis
    4.2.2.3 Spondylolisthesis
    4.2.2.4 Arthritis
  4.2.3 Deformity
    4.2.3.1 Scoliosis
    4.2.3.2 Kyphosis & Lordosis
  4.2.4 Trauma and Tumor
  4.2.5 Vertebral Compression Fractures
    4.2.5.1 Osteoporosis
    4.2.5.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures
4.3 SPINAL DISORDER TREATMENTS
  4.3.1 Decompression
    4.3.1.1 Microdecompression
    4.3.1.2 Laminectomy
  4.3.2 Discectomy
  4.3.3 Spinal Fusion
  4.3.4 Corpectomy
  4.3.5 Spinal Arthroplasty

SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET

5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
5.3 MARKET DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
  5.3.1 Market Drivers
  5.3.2 Market Limiters
5.4 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

FACET FIXATION MARKET

6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
6.3 MARKET DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
  6.3.1 Market Drivers
  6.3.2 Market Limiters
6.4 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

7.1 INTRODUCTION
  7.1.1 Approach Types
    7.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive PLIF (MIPLIF)
    7.1.1.2 Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MITLIF)
    7.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)
7.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
  7.2.1 Total MIS Interbody Procedures
  7.2.2 Total MIS Interbody Procedures by Approach
7.3 MARKET OVERVIEW
7.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
    7.4.1.1 MIPLIF Market
    7.4.1.2 MITLIF Market
    7.4.1.3 LLIF Market
7.5 MARKET DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
  7.5.1 Market Drivers
  7.5.2 Market Limiters
7.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

MINIMALLY INVASIVE PEDICLE SCREW MARKET

8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
  8.2.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures
  8.2.2 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Access Type
8.3MARKET OVERVIEW
8.4MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
  8.4.1 Percutaneous MIS Pedicle Screw Market
  8.4.2 Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market
    8.4.2.1 Cannulated Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market
    8.4.2.2 Non-Cannulated Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market
8.5 MARKET DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
  8.5.1 Market Drivers
  8.5.2 Market Limiters
8.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
  9.2.1 HydroCision
  9.2.2 Baylis Medical Company
  9.2.3 Spinal Restoration
  9.2.4 SpineOvations
  9.2.5 The Laser Spine Institute
    9.2.5.1 Facet Thermal Ablation
    9.2.5.2 Foraminotomy and Laminectomy
    9.2.5.3 Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy

ABBREVIATIONS

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF FIGURES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET

Figure 3-1: Total MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 3-2: Total MIS Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 3-3: Total MIS Spinal Implant Market Percentages by Segment, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 3-4: Growth Rates by Segment, Total MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 3-5: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 3-6: Leading Competitors, MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2009

THE HUMAN SPINE

SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET

Figure 5-1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 5-2: Drivers and Limiters, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2009
Figure 5-3: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2009

FACET FIXATION MARKET

Figure 6-1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 6-2: Drivers and Limiters, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2009
Figure 6-3: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2009

MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

Figure 7-1: Total MIS Interbody Procedures, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-2: Total MIS Interbody Procedure Percentages by Approach, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-3: MIS Interbody Procedures by Approach, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-4: Total MIS Interbody Device Market Percentages by Approach, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-5: Total MIS Interbody Device Market by Approach, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-6: Total MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-7: MIPLIF Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-8: MITLIF Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-9: LLIF Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 7-10: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2009
Figure 7-11: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2009

MINIMALLY INVASIVE PEDICLE SCREW MARKET

Figure 8-1: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-2: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Percentages by Access Type, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-3: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Access Type, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-4: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Access Type, U.S., 2009
Figure 8-5: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market Percentages by Access Type, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-6: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-7: Percutaneous MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-8: Cannulated Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-9: Non-Cannulated Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Figure 8-10: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2009
Figure 8-11: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2009

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

ABBREVIATIONS

LIST OF CHARTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Chart 1-1: Total MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 1-2: Average Selling Price, Spinous Process Fixation Devices, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 1-3: Facet Fixation Market vs. Total Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 1-4: Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2006 and 2009
Chart 1-5: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Access Type, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 1-6: Leading Competitors, MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2009

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET

Chart 3-1: Total MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 3-2: Total MIS Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 3-3: Growth Rates by Segment, Total MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 3-4: Leading Competitors, MIS Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2009

THE HUMAN SPINE

SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET

Chart 5-1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 5-2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2009

FACET FIXATION MARKET

Chart 6-1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 6-2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016

MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

Chart 7-1: Total MIS Interbody Procedures, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 7-2: MIS Interbody Procedures by Approach, U.S., 2009
Chart 7-3: MIS Interbody Procedures by Approach, U.S., 2016
Chart 7-4: Total MIS Interbody Device Market by Approach, U.S., 2009
Chart 7-5: Total MIS Interbody Device Market by Approach, U.S., 2016
Chart 7-6: Total MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 7-7: MIPLIF Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 7-8: MITLIF Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 7-9: LLIF Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 7-10: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2009

MINIMALLY INVASIVE PEDICLE SCREW MARKET

Chart 8-1: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 8-2: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Access Type, U.S., 2016
Chart 8-3: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market Percentages by Segment, U.S, 2006 – 2016
Chart 8-4: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 8-5: Percutaneous MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 8-6: Cannulated Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 8-7: Non-Cannulated Retractor MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2006 – 2016
Chart 8-8: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2009

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

ABBREVIATIONS
Skip to top


Italy Wound Care Management Procedures Outlook to 2020 US$ 1,875.00 Oct, 2014 · 39 pages
Brazil Wound Care Management Procedures Outlook to 2020 US$ 1,875.00 Oct, 2014 · 40 pages

Ask Your Question

European Markets for Wound and Tissue Management 2011
Company name*:
Contact person*:
Phone/fax*:
Email*:
Request invoice
Your enquiry:
Please click on a Check Box below to confirm you are not a robot: