U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market
Growth in the minimally invasive spinal implant market is largely driven by the advantages of minimally invasive surgery over open surgery; these include reduced trauma, shorter hospital stays, lower post-operative medication use and earlier return to work. However, growth is expected to slow over the forecast period as a result of the increasing penetration of MIS procedures into the traditional fusion market and increases in the competing motion preservation market.
The vast majority of patients, when given the option, will choose minimally invasive procedures rather than traditional open fusion surgeries. Patients are drawn to the advantages of less invasive techniques. MIS reduces muscle and tissue damage at the surgical site, decreases complications and limits intraoperative time. Clinical outcomes have been largely positive, further favoring the use of MIS techniques over open procedures.
From a practice standpoint, more surgeons are looking into MIS approaches to not only market their practice competitively, but also to increase their potential revenues. MIS procedures often require less intraoperative and hospital time for the patient. As a result, surgeons would theoretically be able to perform more procedures within the same allotted amount of time than if they were to perform the procedures via an open approach.
The vast majority of patients, when given the option, will choose minimally invasive procedures rather than traditional open fusion surgeries. Patients are drawn to the advantages of less invasive techniques. MIS reduces muscle and tissue damage at the surgical site, decreases complications and limits intraoperative time. Clinical outcomes have been largely positive, further favoring the use of MIS techniques over open procedures.
From a practice standpoint, more surgeons are looking into MIS approaches to not only market their practice competitively, but also to increase their potential revenues. MIS procedures often require less intraoperative and hospital time for the patient. As a result, surgeons would theoretically be able to perform more procedures within the same allotted amount of time than if they were to perform the procedures via an open approach.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET
1.2 SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET
1.3 FACET FIXATION MARKET
1.4 MIS INTERBODY FUSION MARKET
1.5 MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET
1.6 MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION MARKET
1.7 LEADING COMPETITORS
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
2.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.1.1 Spinous Process Fixation
3.1.2 Facet Fixation
3.1.3 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
3.1.3.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.3.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.3.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.4 Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Pedicle Screws
3.1.4.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
3.1.4.2 Retractor-Based MIS systems
3.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
3.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
3.3 MARKET BY SEGMENT
3.4 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
3.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
3.5.1 Market Drivers
3.5.2 Market Limiters
3.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
3.7 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
THE HUMAN SPINE
4.1 BASIC ANATOMY
4.2 SPINAL PATHOLOGY AND DISORDERS
4.2.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
4.2.1.1 Disc Herniation
4.2.1.2 Stenosis
4.2.1.3 Spondylolisthesis
4.2.1.4 Arthritis
4.2.2 Spinal Deformities
4.2.2.1 Scoliosis
4.2.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
4.2.3 Trauma and Tumor
4.2.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
4.2.4.1 Osteoporosis
4.2.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures
4.3 SPINAL DISORDER TREATMENTS
4.3.1 Decompression
4.3.1.1 Microdecompression
4.3.1.2 Laminectomy
4.3.2 Discectomy
4.3.3 Spinal Fusion
4.3.4 Corpectomy
4.3.5 Spinal Arthroplasty
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.3 FACET FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.4 MIS INTERBODY FUSION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.5 PEDICLE SCREW PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.6 MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET
6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.2 SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
6.4.1 Market Drivers
6.4.2 Market Limiters
6.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
6.5.1 Leading Competitors
FACET FIXATION MARKET
7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.2 FACET FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
7.5.1 Leading Competitors
MIS INTERBODY FUSION MARKET
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.1.1 Approach Types
8.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
8.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
8.2.1 Total MIS Interbody Procedures
8.2.2 MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers by Approach
8.3 MARKET OVERVIEW
8.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
8.4.1 Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market
8.4.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market
8.4.3 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market
8.4.4 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market
8.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
8.5.1 Market Drivers
8.5.2 Market Limiters
8.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
8.6.1 Leading Competitors
MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
9.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS systems
9.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
9.2.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers
9.2.2 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers by Access Type
9.3 MARKET OVERVIEW
9.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
9.4.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market
9.4.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
9.4.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
9.4.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
9.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
9.5.1 Market Drivers
9.5.2 Market Limiters
9.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
9.6.1 Leading Competitors
MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION MARKET
10.1 INTRODUCTION
10.2 MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
10.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
10.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
10.4.1 Market Drivers
10.4.2 Market Limiters
10.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
ABBREVIATIONS
1.1 U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET
1.2 SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET
1.3 FACET FIXATION MARKET
1.4 MIS INTERBODY FUSION MARKET
1.5 MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET
1.6 MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION MARKET
1.7 LEADING COMPETITORS
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
2.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
U.S. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.1.1 Spinous Process Fixation
3.1.2 Facet Fixation
3.1.3 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
3.1.3.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.3.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.3.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.4 Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Pedicle Screws
3.1.4.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
3.1.4.2 Retractor-Based MIS systems
3.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
3.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
3.3 MARKET BY SEGMENT
3.4 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
3.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
3.5.1 Market Drivers
3.5.2 Market Limiters
3.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
3.7 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
THE HUMAN SPINE
4.1 BASIC ANATOMY
4.2 SPINAL PATHOLOGY AND DISORDERS
4.2.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
4.2.1.1 Disc Herniation
4.2.1.2 Stenosis
4.2.1.3 Spondylolisthesis
4.2.1.4 Arthritis
4.2.2 Spinal Deformities
4.2.2.1 Scoliosis
4.2.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
4.2.3 Trauma and Tumor
4.2.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
4.2.4.1 Osteoporosis
4.2.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures
4.3 SPINAL DISORDER TREATMENTS
4.3.1 Decompression
4.3.1.1 Microdecompression
4.3.1.2 Laminectomy
4.3.2 Discectomy
4.3.3 Spinal Fusion
4.3.4 Corpectomy
4.3.5 Spinal Arthroplasty
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.3 FACET FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.4 MIS INTERBODY FUSION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.5 PEDICLE SCREW PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.6 MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET
6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.2 SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
6.4.1 Market Drivers
6.4.2 Market Limiters
6.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
6.5.1 Leading Competitors
FACET FIXATION MARKET
7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.2 FACET FIXATION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
7.5.1 Leading Competitors
MIS INTERBODY FUSION MARKET
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.1.1 Approach Types
8.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
8.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
8.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
8.2.1 Total MIS Interbody Procedures
8.2.2 MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers by Approach
8.3 MARKET OVERVIEW
8.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
8.4.1 Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market
8.4.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market
8.4.3 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market
8.4.4 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market
8.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
8.5.1 Market Drivers
8.5.2 Market Limiters
8.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
8.6.1 Leading Competitors
MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
9.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS systems
9.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
9.2.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers
9.2.2 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers by Access Type
9.3 MARKET OVERVIEW
9.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
9.4.1 Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market
9.4.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
9.4.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
9.4.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
9.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
9.5.1 Market Drivers
9.5.2 Market Limiters
9.6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
9.6.1 Leading Competitors
MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION MARKET
10.1 INTRODUCTION
10.2 MIS SACROILIAC JOINT FUSION PROCEDURE NUMBERS
10.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
10.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
10.4.1 Market Drivers
10.4.2 Market Limiters
10.5 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
ABBREVIATIONS
LIST OF CHARTS
Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 1 2: Spinous Process Fixation Market Value, U.S., Select Years Between 2013 and 2021
Chart 1 3: Procedure Number Growth Rates, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2012 – 2017
Chart 1 4: Average Selling Price, Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2012 – 2018
Chart 1 5: Average Selling Price vs. Units Sold vs. Market Value, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 1 6: Market Growth Rates, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014 – 2019
Chart 1 7: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Surgery Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 3 1: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Chart 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2014
Chart 3 4: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2021
Chart 3 5: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 3 6: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 5 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 5 2: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 5 3: Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2014
Chart 5 4: Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2021
Chart 5 5: Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2014
Chart 5 6: Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2021
Chart 5 7: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 6 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 6 2: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 6 3: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 7 1: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 7 2: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 7 3: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 8 1: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 2: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2014
Chart 8 3: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2021
Chart 8 4: MIS Interbody Fusion Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 5: MIS Interbody Fusion Market Breakdown, U.S., 2014
Chart 8 6: MIS Interbody Fusion Market Breakdown, U.S., 2021
Chart 8 7: Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 8: Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 9: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 10: Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 11: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 9 1: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2014
Chart 9 3: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2021
Chart 9 4: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 5: MIS Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, U.S., 2014
Chart 9 6: MIS Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, U.S., 2021
Chart 9 7: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 8: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 9: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 10: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 11: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 10 1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 10 2: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 10 3: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 1 2: Spinous Process Fixation Market Value, U.S., Select Years Between 2013 and 2021
Chart 1 3: Procedure Number Growth Rates, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2012 – 2017
Chart 1 4: Average Selling Price, Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2012 – 2018
Chart 1 5: Average Selling Price vs. Units Sold vs. Market Value, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 1 6: Market Growth Rates, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014 – 2019
Chart 1 7: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Surgery Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 3 1: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Chart 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2014
Chart 3 4: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2021
Chart 3 5: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 3 6: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 5 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 5 2: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 5 3: Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2014
Chart 5 4: Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2021
Chart 5 5: Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2014
Chart 5 6: Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2021
Chart 5 7: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 6 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 6 2: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 6 3: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 7 1: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 7 2: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 7 3: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 8 1: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 2: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2014
Chart 8 3: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2021
Chart 8 4: MIS Interbody Fusion Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 5: MIS Interbody Fusion Market Breakdown, U.S., 2014
Chart 8 6: MIS Interbody Fusion Market Breakdown, U.S., 2021
Chart 8 7: Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 8: Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 9: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 10: Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 8 11: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 9 1: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2014
Chart 9 3: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2021
Chart 9 4: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 5: MIS Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, U.S., 2014
Chart 9 6: MIS Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, U.S., 2021
Chart 9 7: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 8: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 9: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 10: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 9 11: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Chart 10 1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 10 2: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Chart 10 3: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3 1: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 3 4: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 3 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 5 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 2: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 3: Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Procedure Numbers by Approach, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 4: Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers by Access Type, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 5: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 6 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 6 2: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 6 3: Drivers and Limiters, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 6 4: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 7 1: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 7 2: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 7 3: Drivers and Limiters, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 7 4: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 8 1: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 2: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 3: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 4: MIS Interbody Fusion Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 8 5: Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 6: Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 7: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 8: Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 9: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 8 10: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 9 1: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 3: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 4: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 9 5: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 6: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 7: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 8: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 9: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 9 10: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 10 1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 10 2: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 10 3: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 10 4: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
COMPANIES MENTIONED
Medtronic
DePuy Synthes
NuVasive
Stryker
Globus Medical
Biomet
SI-BONE
K2M
Zimmer
Nutech
Amedica
VG Innovations
Pioneer Surgical
OsteoMed
Alphatec Spine
Interventional Spine
Orthofix
Baxano Surgical
Zyga Technology
Figure 3 1: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 3 4: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 3 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 5 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 2: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 3: Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Procedure Numbers by Approach, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 4: Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers by Access Type, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 5 5: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 6 1: Spinous Process Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 6 2: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 6 3: Drivers and Limiters, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 6 4: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 7 1: Facet Fixation Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 7 2: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 7 3: Drivers and Limiters, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 7 4: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 8 1: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 2: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 3: MIS Interbody Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Approach, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 4: MIS Interbody Fusion Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 8 5: Total MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 6: Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 7: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 8: Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 8 9: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 8 10: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 9 1: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 3: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedure Numbers, Breakdown by Access Type, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 4: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2011 – 2021 (US$M)
Figure 9 5: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 6: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 7: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 8: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 9 9: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 9 10: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 10 1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 10 2: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2011 – 2021
Figure 10 3: Drivers and Limiters, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
Figure 10 4: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2014
COMPANIES MENTIONED
Medtronic
DePuy Synthes
NuVasive
Stryker
Globus Medical
Biomet
SI-BONE
K2M
Zimmer
Nutech
Amedica
VG Innovations
Pioneer Surgical
OsteoMed
Alphatec Spine
Interventional Spine
Orthofix
Baxano Surgical
Zyga Technology
