Top Five Global Automotive Tire Manufacturing Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis, July 2012
According to this report, the global automotive tire industry, after witnessing moderate growth during the last five years, is expected to reach an estimated $188 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 4.1% over the next five years. The passenger car segment is forecast to experience the highest growth during 2012-2017. With improvement in economic conditions and increased vehicle production, good growth potential in the heavy truck tire segment is anticipated worldwide.
The global automotive tire industry, after witnessing moderate growth during the last five years, is expected to reach an estimated $188 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 4.1% over the next five years. The passenger car segment is forecast to experience the highest growth during 2012-2017. With improvement in economic conditions and increased vehicle production, good growth potential in the heavy truck tire segment is anticipated worldwide.
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the top five global automotive tire manufacturing companies and presents its findings in -Top Five Global Automotive Tire Manufacturing Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis. The report makes a comparative analysis of the subject companies, their geographic footprints, financial metrics, market performance, marketing and corporate strategies, and presents a SWOT analysis.
The global automotive tire industry holds significant opportunities for industry players due to strong demand for replacement tires and increasing sales of passenger vehicles in developing countries. In 2011, Bridgestone Corporation earned the highest gross profit among the top five competitors, while Michelin SCA achieved the highest net profit. Pirelli & C. SpA depicted the highest revenue growth followed by Continental AG.
Lucintel’s analysts have identified that a loyal customer base and a strong global presence are the two major drivers of these companies. Stringent government standards and environmental legislation, in addition to the global financial slowdown, have affected the rubber and tire industry and could have a negative impact on the market dynamics.
In this study, Lucintel thoroughly profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, capabilities, and strategies of the leaders. The report helps current suppliers realistically assess their capabilities and strategies versus leading competitors. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data, analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plans.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global retail companies. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business.
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's automotive tire manufacturing companies, we thoroughly profile following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
The global automotive tire industry, after witnessing moderate growth during the last five years, is expected to reach an estimated $188 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 4.1% over the next five years. The passenger car segment is forecast to experience the highest growth during 2012-2017. With improvement in economic conditions and increased vehicle production, good growth potential in the heavy truck tire segment is anticipated worldwide.
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the top five global automotive tire manufacturing companies and presents its findings in -Top Five Global Automotive Tire Manufacturing Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis. The report makes a comparative analysis of the subject companies, their geographic footprints, financial metrics, market performance, marketing and corporate strategies, and presents a SWOT analysis.
The global automotive tire industry holds significant opportunities for industry players due to strong demand for replacement tires and increasing sales of passenger vehicles in developing countries. In 2011, Bridgestone Corporation earned the highest gross profit among the top five competitors, while Michelin SCA achieved the highest net profit. Pirelli & C. SpA depicted the highest revenue growth followed by Continental AG.
Lucintel’s analysts have identified that a loyal customer base and a strong global presence are the two major drivers of these companies. Stringent government standards and environmental legislation, in addition to the global financial slowdown, have affected the rubber and tire industry and could have a negative impact on the market dynamics.
In this study, Lucintel thoroughly profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, capabilities, and strategies of the leaders. The report helps current suppliers realistically assess their capabilities and strategies versus leading competitors. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data, analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plans.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global retail companies. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business.
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's automotive tire manufacturing companies, we thoroughly profile following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
- Bridgestone Corporation
- Michelin SCA
- The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
- Continental AG
- Pirelli & C. SpA
- Company overview
- Benchmarking (financial and market)
- SWOT analysis
- Product positioning
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Corporate strategy
- Market size estimates in terms of (US $) value by segments of the automotive tire manufacturing companies
- Regional analysis: automotive tire manufacturing companies breakdown by key regions (North America, Europe, APAC, and ROW)
- Market trends, drivers, and forecasts
- Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial and market strength
- Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
- Product line overview and positioning of top players
- SWOT analysis of the leaders
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Corporate strategy
- More than 125 valuable figures/charts and 45 tables are provided in this report.
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Supply Chain Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON MICHELIN SCA
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON CONTINENTAL AB
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON PIRELLI & C. S.P.A.
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Supply Chain Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON MICHELIN SCA
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON CONTINENTAL AB
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON PIRELLI & C. S.P.A.
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for automotive tire industry
Figure 3.2Global automotive tire industry trend (2006-2011)
Figure 3.3: Global automotive tire industry regional trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.4: Global automotive tire industry regional trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.5:Global automotive tire industry segment trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.6: Global automotive tire industry segment trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.7: Global automotive Tire Industry market opportunity by region (2011-2017) (%)
Figure 3.8:Global automotive Tire Industry market opportunity by segment (2011-2017) (%)
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top 5 global automotive tire manufacturing companies
Figure 4.2: Gross profit and net profit of top 5 players (2011)
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis - growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Global market share of top players in automotive tire industry (2006) (%)
Figure 4.5: Global market share of top players in automotive tire industry (2011) (%)
Figure 4.6: Market share analysis of top players in automotive tire industry (2006) (%)
Figure 4.7: Market share analysis of top players in automotive tire industry (2011)(E) (%)
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis of top players in automotive tire industry (2011) (%)
Figure 4.9: Global automotive tire industry: 2011 market fragmentation/consolidation
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: US $B
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: US $B
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: US $B
Figure 4.13: Market value Row: US $B
Figure 4.14:Global automotive tire manufacturing companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (US $B)
Figure 4.15: Global automotive tire manufacturing companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top 5 major players
CHAPTER 5.COMPANY PROFILE OF BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
Figure 5.1: Bridgestone Corporation revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel triad -Bridgestone Corporation
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking of Bridgestone Corporation against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Bridgestone Corporation against Top 5 best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in %
Figure 5.17: Comparison of for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 5.18: Bridgestone Corporation productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 5.19: Bridgestone Corporation fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6.COMPANY PROFILE OF MICHELIN SCA
Figure 6.1: Michelin SCA revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad -Michelin SCA
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Michelin SCA against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Michelin SCA against Top 5 best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Michelin SCA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend for Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend for Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend for Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend for Michelin SCA2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in %
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Michelin SCA R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players- average-2011
Figure 6.18: Michelin SCA productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.19: Michelin SCA fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7.COMPANY PROFILE OF THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Figure 7.1: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad - The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company against Top 5 best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Lear Corporation (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in %
Figure 7.17: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 7.18: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.19: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8.COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Figure 8.1: Continental AG revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad - Continental AG
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Continental AG against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Continental AG against Top 5 best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Continental AG (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in %
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Continental AG R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 8.18Continental AG productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 8.19: Continental AG fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9.COMPANY PROFILE OF PIRELLI & C. S.P.A.
Figure 9.1: Pirelli & C. SpA revenue by business segments 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad- Pirelli & C. SpA
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Pirelli & C. SpA against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Pirelli & C. SpA against Top 5 best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend vs.: Pirelli & C. SpA(2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend vs.Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.9: APAC Industry revenue trend vs. Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.10: ROW Industry revenue trend vs.Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in %
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Pirelli & C. SpA R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 9.18: Pirelli & C. SpA productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.19: Pirelli & C. SpA fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for automotive tire industry
Figure 3.2Global automotive tire industry trend (2006-2011)
Figure 3.3: Global automotive tire industry regional trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.4: Global automotive tire industry regional trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.5:Global automotive tire industry segment trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.6: Global automotive tire industry segment trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.7: Global automotive Tire Industry market opportunity by region (2011-2017) (%)
Figure 3.8:Global automotive Tire Industry market opportunity by segment (2011-2017) (%)
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top 5 global automotive tire manufacturing companies
Figure 4.2: Gross profit and net profit of top 5 players (2011)
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis - growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Global market share of top players in automotive tire industry (2006) (%)
Figure 4.5: Global market share of top players in automotive tire industry (2011) (%)
Figure 4.6: Market share analysis of top players in automotive tire industry (2006) (%)
Figure 4.7: Market share analysis of top players in automotive tire industry (2011)(E) (%)
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis of top players in automotive tire industry (2011) (%)
Figure 4.9: Global automotive tire industry: 2011 market fragmentation/consolidation
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: US $B
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: US $B
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: US $B
Figure 4.13: Market value Row: US $B
Figure 4.14:Global automotive tire manufacturing companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (US $B)
Figure 4.15: Global automotive tire manufacturing companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top 5 major players
CHAPTER 5.COMPANY PROFILE OF BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
Figure 5.1: Bridgestone Corporation revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel triad -Bridgestone Corporation
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking of Bridgestone Corporation against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Bridgestone Corporation against Top 5 best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in %
Figure 5.17: Comparison of for Bridgestone Corporation 2007-2011 expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 5.18: Bridgestone Corporation productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 5.19: Bridgestone Corporation fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6.COMPANY PROFILE OF MICHELIN SCA
Figure 6.1: Michelin SCA revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad -Michelin SCA
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Michelin SCA against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Michelin SCA against Top 5 best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Michelin SCA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend for Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend for Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend for Michelin SCA 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend for Michelin SCA2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in %
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Michelin SCA R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players- average-2011
Figure 6.18: Michelin SCA productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.19: Michelin SCA fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7.COMPANY PROFILE OF THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Figure 7.1: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad - The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company against Top 5 best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company(2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Lear Corporation (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in %
Figure 7.17: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 7.18: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.19: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8.COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Figure 8.1: Continental AG revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad - Continental AG
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Continental AG against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Continental AG against Top 5 best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Continental AG (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend vs. Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend for Continental AG (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in %
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Continental AG R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 8.18Continental AG productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 8.19: Continental AG fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9.COMPANY PROFILE OF PIRELLI & C. S.P.A.
Figure 9.1: Pirelli & C. SpA revenue by business segments 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad- Pirelli & C. SpA
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Pirelli & C. SpA against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Pirelli & C. SpA against Top 5 best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend vs.: Pirelli & C. SpA(2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend vs.Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend vs. Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.9: APAC Industry revenue trend vs. Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.10: ROW Industry revenue trend vs.Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend for Pirelli & C. SpA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in %
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Pirelli & C. SpA R&D expenditure vs. top 3 & top 5 players average- 2011
Figure 9.18: Pirelli & C. SpA productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.19: Pirelli & C. SpA fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Global automotive tire industry parameters 2011
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Growth rate by region (2006-2011)
Table 3.4: Growth rate by region (2006-2011)
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top 5 global automotive tire manufacturing companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top 5 automotive tire manufacturing companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (in $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (in %)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - top 5 major players
CHAPTER 5.COMPANY PROFILE OF BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
Table 5.1: Market served: Bridgestone Corporation
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad - Bridgestone Corporation
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Bridgestone Corporation against best and against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6.COMPANY PROFILE OF MICHELIN SCA
Table 6.1: Market served - Michelin SCA
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad - Michelin SCA
Table 6.3: Financial Benchmarking of Michelin SCA against best and against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7.COMPANY PROFILE OF THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Table 7.1: Market served - The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad - The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Table 7.3: Financial Benchmarking ofThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber Companyagainst best and against Top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8.COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Table 8.1: Lucintel triad -Continental AG
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad - Continental AG
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Continental AG against best and against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9.COMPANY PROFILE OF PIRELLI & C. S.P.A.
Table 9.1: Markets Served - Pirelli & C. SpA
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad - Pirelli & C. SpA
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Pirelli & C. SpA against best and against Top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Global automotive tire industry parameters 2011
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Growth rate by region (2006-2011)
Table 3.4: Growth rate by region (2006-2011)
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top 5 global automotive tire manufacturing companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top 5 automotive tire manufacturing companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (in $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (in %)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - top 5 major players
CHAPTER 5.COMPANY PROFILE OF BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
Table 5.1: Market served: Bridgestone Corporation
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad - Bridgestone Corporation
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Bridgestone Corporation against best and against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6.COMPANY PROFILE OF MICHELIN SCA
Table 6.1: Market served - Michelin SCA
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad - Michelin SCA
Table 6.3: Financial Benchmarking of Michelin SCA against best and against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7.COMPANY PROFILE OF THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Table 7.1: Market served - The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad - The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Table 7.3: Financial Benchmarking ofThe Goodyear Tire & Rubber Companyagainst best and against Top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8.COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Table 8.1: Lucintel triad -Continental AG
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad - Continental AG
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Continental AG against best and against top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9.COMPANY PROFILE OF PIRELLI & C. S.P.A.
Table 9.1: Markets Served - Pirelli & C. SpA
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad - Pirelli & C. SpA
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Pirelli & C. SpA against best and against Top 3 and top 5 industry players- average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
