Top Five Global Automotive Sensor Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis, March 2013
According to this report, with good opportunities for growth anticipated in the global market for automotive sensors, the industry is estimated to reach in annual revenue $18.8 billion in 2017. The global automotive sensors industry is consolidated industry and involves automotive vehicle manufacturers and automotive component suppliers as its major customers.
With good opportunities for growth anticipated in the global market for automotive sensors, the industry is estimated to reach in annual revenue $18.8 billion in 2017. The global automotive sensors industry is consolidated industry and involves automotive vehicle manufacturers and automotive component suppliers as its major customers.
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the industry and presents its findings in Top Five Global Automotive Sensor Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis. The report provides detailed insight into the performance of the top five automotive sensor companies across the world. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among the peer group, and in which areas, and therefore clarifies leading performance standards and the strengths and weaknesses of companies covered.
The industry is largely driven by growth in the sales of vehicles that are served with various sensor applications. These applications are segmented as engine and transmission, safety and security, body applications, chassis applications, and driver support. The US, Europe and Asia Pacific (APAC), specifically China, India, and Japan, are found the major regions attaining global growth for sensors in automotive applications. In this study, Lucintel profiles the following five companies with competitive assessments:
This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a competitive benchmarking of the worlds top five automotive sensor companies. The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, capabilities, and strategies of the leaders. The report helps current suppliers realistically assess their capabilities and strategies, vis-a-vis leading competitors. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plans.
This market report is an indispensable reference guide for materials suppliers, product manufacturers, investors, executives, distributors, and many more that operate in this market.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global automotive sensor industry. In todays chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
In Lucintels newest competitive research study on the worlds automotive sensor, we thoroughly profile following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
With good opportunities for growth anticipated in the global market for automotive sensors, the industry is estimated to reach in annual revenue $18.8 billion in 2017. The global automotive sensors industry is consolidated industry and involves automotive vehicle manufacturers and automotive component suppliers as its major customers.
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the industry and presents its findings in Top Five Global Automotive Sensor Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis. The report provides detailed insight into the performance of the top five automotive sensor companies across the world. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among the peer group, and in which areas, and therefore clarifies leading performance standards and the strengths and weaknesses of companies covered.
The industry is largely driven by growth in the sales of vehicles that are served with various sensor applications. These applications are segmented as engine and transmission, safety and security, body applications, chassis applications, and driver support. The US, Europe and Asia Pacific (APAC), specifically China, India, and Japan, are found the major regions attaining global growth for sensors in automotive applications. In this study, Lucintel profiles the following five companies with competitive assessments:
- Continental AG
- Delphi Automotive PLC
- Denso Corporation
- Honeywell International Inc.
- TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a competitive benchmarking of the worlds top five automotive sensor companies. The study provides up-to-date information on the market share, profit margins, capabilities, and strategies of the leaders. The report helps current suppliers realistically assess their capabilities and strategies, vis-a-vis leading competitors. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plans.
This market report is an indispensable reference guide for materials suppliers, product manufacturers, investors, executives, distributors, and many more that operate in this market.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global automotive sensor industry. In todays chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business
In Lucintels newest competitive research study on the worlds automotive sensor, we thoroughly profile following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
- Continental AG
- Delphi Automotive PLC
- Denso Corporation
- Honeywell International Inc.
- TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
- Company overview
- Benchmarking (financial & market)
- SWOT analysis
- Product positioning
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Corporate strategy
- Market size estimates in terms of (US $) value by segments of the global automotive sensor
- Regional analysis: global automotive sensor breakdown by key regions (e.g., North America, Europe, APAC and ROW)
- Market trends, drivers and forecasts
- Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial & market strength
- Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
- Product line overview and positioning of top players
- SWOT analysis of the leaders
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Corporate strategy
- More than 128 valuable figures/charts and 45 tables are provided in this report
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON CONTINENTAL AG
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON DENSO CORPORATION
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP.
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON CONTINENTAL AG
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON DENSO CORPORATION
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP.
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNI
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for automotive sensor market
Figure 3.2: Global automotive sensor industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global automotive sensor industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global automotive sensor industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global automotive sensor industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global automotive sensor industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global automotive sensor industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global automotive sensor industry opportunity by segment
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Top five automotive sensor companies - financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five automotive sensor gross profits and net profit analysis - 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis - growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(US $B)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Figure 5.1: Continental AGs revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad - Continental AG
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Continental AG against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Continental AG against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Continental AG (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Continental AG trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.16: Continental AG trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Continental AG SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Continental AG productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Continental AG fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC
Figure 6.1: Delphi Automotive PLC revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Delphi Automotive PLC
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Delphi Automotive PLC against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Delphi Automotive PLC against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Delphi Automotive PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Delphi Automotive PLC trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.16: Delphi Automotive PLC trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total
revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Delphi Automotive PLC SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Delphi Automotive PLC productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Delphi Automotive PLC fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF DENSO CORPORATION
Figure 7.1: Denso Corporation revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad - Denso Corporation
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Denso Corporation against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Denso Corporation against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Denso Corporation2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporationl (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Denso Corporation trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.16: Denso Corporation trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Denso Corporation SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: Denso Corporation productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Denso Corporation fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Figure 8.1: Honeywell International Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad - Honeywell International Inc.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Honeywell International Inc. against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Honeywell International Inc. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. 2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Honeywell International Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 8.16: Honeywell International Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Honeywell International Inc. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Honeywell International Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Honeywell International Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP.
Figure 9.1: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad - TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.16: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNI
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for automotive sensor market
Figure 3.2: Global automotive sensor industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global automotive sensor industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global automotive sensor industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global automotive sensor industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global automotive sensor industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global automotive sensor industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global automotive sensor industry opportunity by segment
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Top five automotive sensor companies - financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five automotive sensor gross profits and net profit analysis - 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis - growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(US $B)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011(%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Figure 5.1: Continental AGs revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad - Continental AG
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Continental AG against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Continental AG against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Continental AG (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Continental AG 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Continental AG trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.16: Continental AG trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Continental AG SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Continental AG productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Continental AG fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC
Figure 6.1: Delphi Automotive PLC revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Delphi Automotive PLC
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Delphi Automotive PLC against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Delphi Automotive PLC against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Delphi Automotive PLC (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs Delphi Automotive PLC 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Delphi Automotive PLC trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.16: Delphi Automotive PLC trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total
revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Delphi Automotive PLC SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: Delphi Automotive PLC productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: Delphi Automotive PLC fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF DENSO CORPORATION
Figure 7.1: Denso Corporation revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad - Denso Corporation
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Denso Corporation against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Denso Corporation against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Denso Corporation2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporationl (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Denso Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Denso Corporation trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 7.16: Denso Corporation trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Denso Corporation SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: Denso Corporation productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Denso Corporation fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Figure 8.1: Honeywell International Inc. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad - Honeywell International Inc.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Honeywell International Inc. against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Honeywell International Inc. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. 2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Honeywell International Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Honeywell International Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 8.16: Honeywell International Inc. trend in R&D expenses Percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Honeywell International Inc. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Honeywell International Inc. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Honeywell International Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP.
Figure 9.1: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad - TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. against top three and top five industry players average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.16: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. SE R&D expenditure Vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global automotive sensor industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global automotive sensor companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five automotive sensor companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Table 5.1: Market served Continental AG
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad - Continental AG
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Continental AG against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC
Table 6.1: Market served - Delphi Automotive PLC
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad - Delphi Automotive PLC
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Delphi Automotive PLC against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF DENSO CORPORATION
Table 7.1: Market served - Denso Corporation
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad - Denso Corporation
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Denso Corporation against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Table 8.1: Market served - Honeywell International Inc.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad - Honeywell International Inc.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Honeywell International Inc. against best and against Top three and top five industry players average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP.
Table 9.1: Markets Served - TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad - TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. against best and against Top three and top five industry players average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global automotive sensor industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global automotive sensor companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five automotive sensor companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $B)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF CONTINENTAL AG
Table 5.1: Market served Continental AG
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad - Continental AG
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Continental AG against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC
Table 6.1: Market served - Delphi Automotive PLC
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad - Delphi Automotive PLC
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Delphi Automotive PLC against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF DENSO CORPORATION
Table 7.1: Market served - Denso Corporation
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad - Denso Corporation
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Denso Corporation against best and against Top three and Top five industry players average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Table 8.1: Market served - Honeywell International Inc.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad - Honeywell International Inc.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Honeywell International Inc. against best and against Top three and top five industry players average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP.
Table 9.1: Markets Served - TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad - TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. against best and against Top three and top five industry players average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
