Medical Affairs Reputations (US) [Melanoma]
Find out what the leading medical affairs teams are doing right
Medical affairs teams for two leading melanoma treatments are doing all the right things in the US. Not only did they earn the highest overall scores, the oncologists we surveyed gave them the highest performance and satisfaction ratings on almost every medical affairs service we asked about. This report reveals how your team measures up, so you can learn from their success and build better relationships with doctors.
Learn what your team gets right, and where it’s going wrong in Medical Affairs Reputations: Melanoma (US).
Comparing 8 major melanoma treatments from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., Novartis, and Roche this report reveals:
Find out what more doctors want from your medical affairs team including
Top Takeaways
Developed with the help of medical affairs specialists, this report gives you an in-depth comparison of 8 medical affairs teams—answering important questions like:
What do doctors need?
We surveyed 100 US medical oncologists and dermato-oncologists, chosen from the largest community of validated physicians in the world
All respondents:
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE!
At FirstWord, we stand behind our reports. If you're not completely satisfied, we’ll refund your money. Guaranteed.
About FirstWord
FirstWord is an innovative industry intelligence leader serving over 240,000 Pharma and MedTech professionals worldwide. FirstWord offers a range of products and services designed to help your company gain a competitive edge by making key business decisions with speed and confidence.
FirstWord Pharma PLUS is a personalised and comprehensive intelligence service delivering up-to-the-minute pharma news, insight, analysis and expert views of importance to your company’s success.
FirstWord Reports deliver timely, need-to-know intelligence about your products, your competitors and your markets. Covering biosimilars, market access, medical affairs, sales & marketing, technology and therapy areas, FirstWord Reports provide expert views and intelligence on the challenges facing pharma today.
Medical affairs teams for two leading melanoma treatments are doing all the right things in the US. Not only did they earn the highest overall scores, the oncologists we surveyed gave them the highest performance and satisfaction ratings on almost every medical affairs service we asked about. This report reveals how your team measures up, so you can learn from their success and build better relationships with doctors.
Learn what your team gets right, and where it’s going wrong in Medical Affairs Reputations: Melanoma (US).
Comparing 8 major melanoma treatments from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., Novartis, and Roche this report reveals:
Find out what more doctors want from your medical affairs team including
- How doctors rate your team overall, and on 12 key medical affairs services.
- Which medical affairs services are most important, and what you can do to improve them.
- How, and how often doctors want to meet with your team.
Top Takeaways
- The right stuff: The teams that earn the highest overall quality scores also get the highest performance and satisfaction scores for most medical affairs services.
- Doctors are hungry for information: They identified 2 ways teams can improve information provision, and highlighted 3 specific types of information they want more of.
- Clinical information is priority #1: For doctors, the 5 most important medical affairs roles all involve providing information they can use to make clinical decisions.
- Three teams need specific improvements: Find out which medical affairs services they need to improve.
- Dialling in the frequency: Teams are reaching out to doctors at almost the right intervals. Does your team need to reach out more often or back off a bit?
- Call or email? Preferably neither: The surveyed doctors want to meet teams in-person but what’s the best way to get in touch if you can’t manage a face-to face interaction?
- Cotellic (cobimetinib; Roche)
- Imlygic (talimogene laherparepvec; Amgen)
- Keytruda (pembrolizumab; Merck & Co.)
- Mekinist (trametinib; Novartis)
- Opdivo (nivolumab; Bristol-Myers Squibb)
- Tafinlar (dabrafenib; Novartis)
- Yervoy (ipilimumab; Bristol-Myers Squibb)
- Zelboraf (vemurafenib; Roche)
Developed with the help of medical affairs specialists, this report gives you an in-depth comparison of 8 medical affairs teams—answering important questions like:
What do doctors need?
- How, and how often are they using your medical affairs team?
- What services do they consider most important?
- How often should you contact them? What channels are best?
- How memorable are your team’s interactions with doctors?
- How do doctors rank your team for performance and satisfaction in 12 key areas?
- How does your team compare to the competition—in each area, and overall?
- Are you delivering the services that are most important to doctors?
- Where do you need to improve?
- How can your team enhance its services?
We surveyed 100 US medical oncologists and dermato-oncologists, chosen from the largest community of validated physicians in the world
All respondents:
- Have been practicing for between 3 and 35 years
- See at least 5 patients with melanoma in a typical month
- Devote at least 50% of their time to direct patient care
- Have interacted with at least one listed product’s medical affairs team in the past 6 months.
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE!
At FirstWord, we stand behind our reports. If you're not completely satisfied, we’ll refund your money. Guaranteed.
About FirstWord
FirstWord is an innovative industry intelligence leader serving over 240,000 Pharma and MedTech professionals worldwide. FirstWord offers a range of products and services designed to help your company gain a competitive edge by making key business decisions with speed and confidence.
FirstWord Pharma PLUS is a personalised and comprehensive intelligence service delivering up-to-the-minute pharma news, insight, analysis and expert views of importance to your company’s success.
FirstWord Reports deliver timely, need-to-know intelligence about your products, your competitors and your markets. Covering biosimilars, market access, medical affairs, sales & marketing, technology and therapy areas, FirstWord Reports provide expert views and intelligence on the challenges facing pharma today.
1. OBJECTIVES, SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLING, PRODUCTS INCLUDED IN THE SURVEY, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2. CURRENT STATUS OF INTERACTIONS WITH DIFFERENT MEDICAL AFFAIRS TEAMS
2.1 Interactions in the past 6 months with Medical Affairs teams for each product
2.2 Current frequency of interactions with medical affair teams for each product
3. COMPETITIVE EVALUATION OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS TEAMS PERFORMANCE ON VARIOUS ATTRIBUTES
3.1 Evaluation of overall quality of interactions with Medical Affairs teams for each product
3.2 Attribute importance of Medical Affairs teams roles to physicians’ practice
3.3 EdgeMap analysis – Competitive evaluation on Medical Affairs teams performance on attributes
3.4 Competitive evaluation of physicians satisfaction of interaction with Medical Affairs teams
3.5 Need-Gap analysis by product
4. PREFERRED INTERACTION MEDIA, FREQUENCY, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
4.1 Preferred interaction media and frequency, and suggestions for improvement
5. APPENDIX
2. CURRENT STATUS OF INTERACTIONS WITH DIFFERENT MEDICAL AFFAIRS TEAMS
2.1 Interactions in the past 6 months with Medical Affairs teams for each product
2.2 Current frequency of interactions with medical affair teams for each product
3. COMPETITIVE EVALUATION OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS TEAMS PERFORMANCE ON VARIOUS ATTRIBUTES
3.1 Evaluation of overall quality of interactions with Medical Affairs teams for each product
3.2 Attribute importance of Medical Affairs teams roles to physicians’ practice
3.3 EdgeMap analysis – Competitive evaluation on Medical Affairs teams performance on attributes
3.4 Competitive evaluation of physicians satisfaction of interaction with Medical Affairs teams
3.5 Need-Gap analysis by product
4. PREFERRED INTERACTION MEDIA, FREQUENCY, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT
4.1 Preferred interaction media and frequency, and suggestions for improvement
5. APPENDIX
