Top Five Global IT Services Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis, June 2012
According to this report, the global Information Technology (IT) services market experienced solid growth during the last five years and is expected to approach US $1,150 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 5.3% over the next five years. The industry experienced an average gross profit of 37% and an average net profit of 9.5% in 2011, with IBM ranking first in both measures.
The global Information Technology (IT) services market experienced solid growth during the last five years and is expected to approach US $1,150 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 5.3% over the next five years. The industry experienced an average gross profit of 37% and an average net profit of 9.5% in 2011, with IBM ranking first in both measures.
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the top five global IT services companies and presents its findings in -Top Five Global IT Services Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.
The IT services industry comprises IT management and outsourcing services, IT consulting and integration services, as well as maintenance and support services. The industry is fragmented and a combination of factors such as IT spending and economic growth influences industry dynamics significantly. Asia Pacific (APAC) experienced the highest growth during 2006-2011. Asia and the Rest of the World (ROW) offer good growth potential in the IT services industry over the forecast period. Lucintel’s research indicates that Greater China and India are expected to continue to emerge as key growth markets. IT management and outsourcing services present good growth potential during the forecast period.
In this study, Lucintel thoroughly profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a concise overview of the world’s top five Global IT Services companies. This discussion is limited to a comparative analysis (benchmarking) of the subject companies, their geographic footprints, financial metrics, market performance, marketing and corporate strategies, and SWOT analysis. The report helps current suppliers realistically assess their capabilities, strategies, vis-a-vis leading competitors. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data, analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plan.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in Personal computer market. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business.
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's leading IT services companies, we thoroughly profile following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
The global Information Technology (IT) services market experienced solid growth during the last five years and is expected to approach US $1,150 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 5.3% over the next five years. The industry experienced an average gross profit of 37% and an average net profit of 9.5% in 2011, with IBM ranking first in both measures.
Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the top five global IT services companies and presents its findings in -Top Five Global IT Services Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis.
The IT services industry comprises IT management and outsourcing services, IT consulting and integration services, as well as maintenance and support services. The industry is fragmented and a combination of factors such as IT spending and economic growth influences industry dynamics significantly. Asia Pacific (APAC) experienced the highest growth during 2006-2011. Asia and the Rest of the World (ROW) offer good growth potential in the IT services industry over the forecast period. Lucintel’s research indicates that Greater China and India are expected to continue to emerge as key growth markets. IT management and outsourcing services present good growth potential during the forecast period.
In this study, Lucintel thoroughly profiles the following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
- Accenture
- Computer Sciences Corporation
- Fujitsu Limited
- Hewlett-Packard Company
- International Business Machines Corporation
This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a concise overview of the world’s top five Global IT Services companies. This discussion is limited to a comparative analysis (benchmarking) of the subject companies, their geographic footprints, financial metrics, market performance, marketing and corporate strategies, and SWOT analysis. The report helps current suppliers realistically assess their capabilities, strategies, vis-a-vis leading competitors. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data, analysis, and insight, critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plan.
This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in Personal computer market. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business.
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's leading IT services companies, we thoroughly profile following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
- Accenture
- Computer Sciences Corporation
- Fujitsu Limited
- Hewlett-Packard Company
- International Business Machines Corporation
- Company overview
- Benchmarking (financial and market)
- SWOT analysis
- Product positioning
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Corporate strategy
- Market size estimates in terms of US dollar value by segments of the global it services companies
- Regional analysis: global IT services companies breakdown by key regions (North America, Europe, APAC and ROW)
- Market trends, drivers and forecasts
- Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial & market strength
- Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
- Product line overview and positioning of top players
- SWOT analysis of the leaders
- Marketing strategy and tactics
- Corporate strategy
- More than 106 valuable figures/charts and 43 tables are provided in this report
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Supply chain Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company overview
Benchmarking (financial & market)
SWOT analysis
Product positioning
Marketing strategy and tactics
Corporate strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON ACCENTURE PLC
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON FUJITSU LIMITED
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Supply chain Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company overview
Benchmarking (financial & market)
SWOT analysis
Product positioning
Marketing strategy and tactics
Corporate strategy
5. COMPANY PROFILE ON ACCENTURE PLC
6. COMPANY PROFILE ON COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
7. COMPANY PROFILE ON FUJITSU LIMITED
8. COMPANY PROFILE ON HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
9. COMPANY PROFILE ON INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for IT services market
Figure 3.2: Porter’s Five Forces Analysis for IT services market
Figure 3.3: Global IT services industry trend (2006-2011)
Figure 3.4: Global IT services regional trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.5: Global IT services regional trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.6: Global IT services industry segment trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.7: Global IT services industry segment trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.8: Global IT services industry opportunity by region (2012-2017) (%)
Figure 3.9: Global IT services industry opportunity by segment (2012-2017) (%)
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global IT Services companies
Figure 4.2: top five Global IT services companies gross profit and net profit analysis (2011)
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis - growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Global market share of top players in IT services market (2006) (%)
Figure 4.5: Global market share of top players in IT services market (2011) (%)
Figure 4.6: Market share analysis of top players in IT services market (2006) (%)
Figure 4.7: Market share analysis of top players in IT services market (2011) (%)
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis of top players in IT services market (2011) (%)
Figure 4.9: Global IT Services market: 2011 market fragmentation/consolidation
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: US $B
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: US $B
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: US $B
Figure 4.13: Market value Row: US $B
Figure 4.14: Global IT services companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (US $B)
Figure 4.15: Global IT services companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ACCENTURE PLC
Figure 5.1: Accenture revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel triad - Accenture Plc
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking of Accenture Plc against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Accenture Plc against top five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Accenture Plc (2001-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in %
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Accenture’s R&D expenditure versus top threeand top five players average- 2011
Figure 5.18: Accenture Plc productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.19: Accenture Plc fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
Figure 6.1: Computer Sciences Corporation revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Computer Sciences Corporation
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Computer Sciences Corporation against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Computer Sciences Corporation against top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Computer Sciences Corporation productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 6.16: Computer Sciences Corporation fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 6.17: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF FUJITSU LIMITED
Figure 7.1: Fujitsu limited revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad - Fujitsu limited
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Fujitsu limited against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Fujitsu limited against top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend versusFujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in US$ B
Figure 7.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in %
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Fujitsu limited R&D expenditure versus top three and top five players average- 2011
Figure 7.18: Fujitsu limited productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 7.19: Fujitsu limited fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Figure 8.1: Hewlett-Packard Company revenue by business structure 20114
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad - Hewlett-Packard Company
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Hewlett-Packard Company against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Hewlett-Packard Company against top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend versusFujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in US$ B
Figure 8.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in %
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Hewlett-Packard Company R&D expenditure versus top three and top five players' average- 2011
Figure 8.18: Hewlett-Packard Company productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 8.19: Hewlett-Packard Company fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
Figure 9.1: International Business Machine revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad - International Business Machines
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of International Business Machines against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 9.4:Financial benchmarking of International Business Machines against top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend versusInternational Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend for international Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in US$ B
Figure 9.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in %
Figure 9.17: Comparison of International Business Machines R&D expenditure versus top three and top five players' average- 2011
Figure 9.18: International Business Machines productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 9.19: International Business Machines fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for IT services market
Figure 3.2: Porter’s Five Forces Analysis for IT services market
Figure 3.3: Global IT services industry trend (2006-2011)
Figure 3.4: Global IT services regional trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.5: Global IT services regional trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.6: Global IT services industry segment trend (2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.7: Global IT services industry segment trend (2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.8: Global IT services industry opportunity by region (2012-2017) (%)
Figure 3.9: Global IT services industry opportunity by segment (2012-2017) (%)
CHAPTER 4.COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Figure 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global IT Services companies
Figure 4.2: top five Global IT services companies gross profit and net profit analysis (2011)
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis - growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Global market share of top players in IT services market (2006) (%)
Figure 4.5: Global market share of top players in IT services market (2011) (%)
Figure 4.6: Market share analysis of top players in IT services market (2006) (%)
Figure 4.7: Market share analysis of top players in IT services market (2011) (%)
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis of top players in IT services market (2011) (%)
Figure 4.9: Global IT Services market: 2011 market fragmentation/consolidation
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: US $B
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: US $B
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: US $B
Figure 4.13: Market value Row: US $B
Figure 4.14: Global IT services companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (US $B)
Figure 4.15: Global IT services companies - 2011 (E): regional revenue trend (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ACCENTURE PLC
Figure 5.1: Accenture revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel triad - Accenture Plc
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking of Accenture Plc against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Accenture Plc against top five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Accenture Plc (2001-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend for Accenture Plc 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in %
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Accenture’s R&D expenditure versus top threeand top five players average- 2011
Figure 5.18: Accenture Plc productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.19: Accenture Plc fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
Figure 6.1: Computer Sciences Corporation revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Computer Sciences Corporation
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Computer Sciences Corporation against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Computer Sciences Corporation against top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend for Computer Sciences Corporation 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Computer Sciences Corporation productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 6.16: Computer Sciences Corporation fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 6.17: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF FUJITSU LIMITED
Figure 7.1: Fujitsu limited revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad - Fujitsu limited
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Fujitsu limited against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Fujitsu limited against top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend versusFujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in US$ B
Figure 7.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in %
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Fujitsu limited R&D expenditure versus top three and top five players average- 2011
Figure 7.18: Fujitsu limited productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 7.19: Fujitsu limited fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Figure 8.1: Hewlett-Packard Company revenue by business structure 20114
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad - Hewlett-Packard Company
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Hewlett-Packard Company against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Hewlett-Packard Company against top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend versusFujitsu limited (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Fujitsu limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007- 2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend for Hewlett-Packard Company (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in US$ B
Figure 8.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in %
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Hewlett-Packard Company R&D expenditure versus top three and top five players' average- 2011
Figure 8.18: Hewlett-Packard Company productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 8.19: Hewlett-Packard Company fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
Figure 9.1: International Business Machine revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad - International Business Machines
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of International Business Machines against top three and top five industry players- average
Figure 9.4:Financial benchmarking of International Business Machines against top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend versusInternational Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus International Business Machines (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend for international Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend for International Business Machines (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in US$ B
Figure 9.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in %
Figure 9.17: Comparison of International Business Machines R&D expenditure versus top three and top five players' average- 2011
Figure 9.18: International Business Machines productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 9.19: International Business Machines fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Market parameters of global IT services industry 2011
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Growth rate by region (2006-2011)
Table 3.4: Growth rate by segment (2006-2011)
CHAPTER 4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global IT services companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top fiveIT services companies
Table 4.3: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.4: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ACCENTURE
Table 5.1: Markets served - Accenture
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad - Accenture
Table 5.3:Financial benchmarking of Accenture against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
Table 6.1:Markets served - Computer Sciences Corporation
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad - Computer Sciences Corporation
Table 6.3: Financial Benchmarking of Computer Sciences Corporation against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF FUJITSU
Table 7.1: Markets served - Fujitsu
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad - Fujitsu
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Fujitsu against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Table 8.1: Market served- Hewlett-Packard Company
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad - Hewlett-Packard Company
Table 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Hewlett-Packard Company against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF IBM
Table 9.1: Markets served - IBM
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad - IBM
Table 9.3: Financial benchmarking of IBM against best and
Against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY
Table 3.1: Market parameters of global IT services industry 2011
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Growth rate by region (2006-2011)
Table 3.4: Growth rate by segment (2006-2011)
CHAPTER 4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global IT services companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top fiveIT services companies
Table 4.3: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.4: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. COMPANY PROFILE OF ACCENTURE
Table 5.1: Markets served - Accenture
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad - Accenture
Table 5.3:Financial benchmarking of Accenture against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. COMPANY PROFILE OF COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
Table 6.1:Markets served - Computer Sciences Corporation
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad - Computer Sciences Corporation
Table 6.3: Financial Benchmarking of Computer Sciences Corporation against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. COMPANY PROFILE OF FUJITSU
Table 7.1: Markets served - Fujitsu
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad - Fujitsu
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Fujitsu against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. COMPANY PROFILE OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Table 8.1: Market served- Hewlett-Packard Company
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad - Hewlett-Packard Company
Table 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Hewlett-Packard Company against best and against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. COMPANY PROFILE OF IBM
Table 9.1: Markets served - IBM
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad - IBM
Table 9.3: Financial benchmarking of IBM against best and
Against top three and top five industry players- average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution - product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution - perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution - promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution - product distribution by region
