Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size, Status and Forecast 2020-2026

August 2020 | 94 pages | ID: G032551BCB0CEN
QYResearch

Abstracts

This report focuses on the global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players. The study objectives are to present the Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service development in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.

The key players covered in this study

• SGS
• Netafim
• SMART Fertilizer Management
• TIMAC AGRO International
• Autogrow
• Banyan Water

Market segment by Type, the product can be split into

• Monitoring Services with Testing
• Monitoring Services without Testing

Market segment by Application, split into

• Agro-Industrial Companies
• Agricultural Institutes
• Others

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report covers

• North America
• Europe
• Asia-Pacific

The study objectives of this report are:

• To analyze global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players.
• To present the Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service development in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
• To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their development plan and strategies.
• To define, describe and forecast the market by type, market and key regions.

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service are as follows:

• History Year: 2015-2019
• Base Year: 2019
• Estimated Year: 2020
• Forecast Year 2020 to 2026

For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2019 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.

Contents

1 REPORT OVERVIEW

1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Key Market Segments
1.3 Players Covered: Ranking by Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue
1.4 Market Analysis by Type
  1.4.1 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Growth Rate by Type: 2020 VS 2026
  1.4.2 Monitoring Services with Testing
  1.4.3 Monitoring Services without Testing
1.5 Market by Application
  1.5.1 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Application: 2020 VS 2026
  1.5.2 Agro-Industrial Companies
  1.5.3 Agricultural Institutes
  1.5.4 Others
1.6 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Industry Impact
  1.6.1 How the Covid-19 is Affecting the Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Industry
    1.6.1.1 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business Impact Assessment - Covid-19
    1.6.1.2 Supply Chain Challenges
    1.6.1.3 COVID-19’s Impact On Crude Oil and Refined Products
  1.6.2 Market Trends and Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Potential Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape
  1.6.3 Measures / Proposal against Covid-19
    1.6.3.1 Government Measures to Combat Covid-19 Impact
    1.6.3.2 Proposal for Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players to Combat Covid-19 Impact
1.7 Study Objectives
1.8 Years Considered

2 GLOBAL GROWTH TRENDS BY REGIONS

2.1 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Perspective (2015-2026)
2.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Growth Trends by Regions
  2.2.1 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Regions: 2015 VS 2020 VS 2026
  2.2.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Historic Market Share by Regions (2015-2020)
  2.2.3 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Forecasted Market Size by Regions (2021-2026)
2.3 Industry Trends and Growth Strategy
  2.3.1 Market Top Trends
  2.3.2 Market Drivers
  2.3.3 Market Challenges
  2.3.4 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
  2.3.5 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Growth Strategy
  2.3.6 Primary Interviews with Key Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players (Opinion Leaders)

3 COMPETITION LANDSCAPE BY KEY PLAYERS

3.1 Global Top Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players by Market Size
  3.1.1 Global Top Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players by Revenue (2015-2020)
  3.1.2 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue Market Share by Players (2015-2020)
  3.1.3 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
3.2 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Concentration Ratio
  3.2.1 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
  3.2.2 Global Top 10 and Top 5 Companies by Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue in 2019
3.3 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.4 Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Product Solution and Service
3.5 Date of Enter into Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market
3.6 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 BREAKDOWN DATA BY TYPE (2015-2026)

4.1 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Historic Market Size by Type (2015-2020)
4.2 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Forecasted Market Size by Type (2021-2026)

5 REMOTE FERTIGATION MONITORING SERVICE BREAKDOWN DATA BY APPLICATION (2015-2026)

5.1 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020)
5.2 Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Forecasted Market Size by Application (2021-2026)

6 NORTH AMERICA

6.1 North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size (2015-2020)
6.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Key Players in North America (2019-2020)
6.3 North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Type (2015-2020)
6.4 North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020)

7 EUROPE

7.1 Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size (2015-2020)
7.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Key Players in Europe (2019-2020)
7.3 Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Type (2015-2020)
7.4 Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020)

8 ASIA-PACIFIC

8.1 Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size (2015-2020)
8.2 Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Key Players in Asia-Pacific (2019-2020)
8.3 Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Type (2015-2020)
8.4 Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020)
(2015-2020)
(2015-2020)

9 KEY PLAYERS PROFILES

9.1 SGS
  9.1.1 SGS Company Details
  9.1.2 SGS Business Overview and Its Total Revenue
  9.1.3 SGS Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Introduction
  9.1.4 SGS Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020))
  9.1.5 SGS Recent Development
9.2 Netafim
  9.2.1 Netafim Company Details
  9.2.2 Netafim Business Overview and Its Total Revenue
  9.2.3 Netafim Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Introduction
  9.2.4 Netafim Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
  9.2.5 Netafim Recent Development
9.3 SMART Fertilizer Management
  9.3.1 SMART Fertilizer Management Company Details
  9.3.2 SMART Fertilizer Management Business Overview and Its Total Revenue
  9.3.3 SMART Fertilizer Management Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Introduction
  9.3.4 SMART Fertilizer Management Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
  9.3.5 SMART Fertilizer Management Recent Development
9.4 TIMAC AGRO International
  9.4.1 TIMAC AGRO International Company Details
  9.4.2 TIMAC AGRO International Business Overview and Its Total Revenue
  9.4.3 TIMAC AGRO International Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Introduction
  9.4.4 TIMAC AGRO International Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
  9.4.5 TIMAC AGRO International Recent Development
9.5 Autogrow
  9.5.1 Autogrow Company Details
  9.5.2 Autogrow Business Overview and Its Total Revenue
  9.5.3 Autogrow Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Introduction
  9.5.4 Autogrow Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
  9.5.5 Autogrow Recent Development
9.6 Banyan Water
  9.6.1 Banyan Water Company Details
  9.6.2 Banyan Water Business Overview and Its Total Revenue
  9.6.3 Banyan Water Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Introduction
  9.6.4 Banyan Water Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
  9.6.5 Banyan Water Recent Development

10 ANALYST'S VIEWPOINTS/CONCLUSIONS

11 APPENDIX

11.1 Research Methodology
  11.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
  11.1.2 Data Source
11.2 Disclaimer
11.3 Author Details

List Of Tables

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Key Market Segments
Table 2. Key Players Covered: Ranking by Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue
Table 3. Ranking of Global Top Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Manufacturers by Revenue (US$ Million) in 2019
Table 4. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Growth Rate by Type (US$ Million): 2020 VS 2026
Table 5. Key Players of Monitoring Services with Testing
Table 6. Key Players of Monitoring Services without Testing
Table 7. COVID-19 Impact Global Market: (Four Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Forecast Scenarios)
Table 8. Opportunities and Trends for Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players in the COVID-19 Landscape
Table 9. Present Opportunities in China & Elsewhere Due to the Coronavirus Crisis
Table 10. Key Regions/Countries Measures against Covid-19 Impact
Table 11. Proposal for Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players to Combat Covid-19 Impact
Table 12. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Growth by Application (US$ Million): 2020 VS 2026
Table 13. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Regions (US$ Million): 2020 VS 2026
Table 14. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Regions (2015-2020) (US$ Million)
Table 15. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Regions (2015-2020)
Table 16. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Forecasted Market Size by Regions (2021-2026) (US$ Million)
Table 17. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Regions (2021-2026)
Table 18. Market Top Trends
Table 19. Key Drivers: Impact Analysis
Table 20. Key Challenges
Table 21. Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Growth Strategy
Table 22. Main Points Interviewed from Key Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players
Table 23. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue by Players (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 24. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Players (2015-2020)
Table 25. Global Top Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) (based on the Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service as of 2019)
Table 26. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service by Players Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
Table 27. Key Players Headquarters and Area Served
Table 28. Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Product Solution and Service
Table 29. Date of Enter into Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market
Table 30. Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans
Table 31. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Type (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 32. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Share by Type (2015-2020)
Table 33. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue Market Share by Type (2021-2026)
Table 34. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Share by Application (2015-2020)
Table 35. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 36. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size Share by Application (2021-2026)
Table 37. North America Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue (2019-2020) (Million US$)
Table 38. North America Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share (2019-2020)
Table 39. North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Type (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 40. North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Type (2015-2020)
Table 41. North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 42. North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Application (2015-2020)
Table 43. Europe Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue (2019-2020) (Million US$)
Table 44. Europe Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share (2019-2020)
Table 45. Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Type (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 46. Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Type (2015-2020)
Table 47. Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 48. Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Application (2015-2020)
Table 49. Asia-Pacific Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue (2019-2020) (Million US$)
Table 50. Asia-Pacific Key Players Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share (2019-2020)
Table 51. Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Type (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 52. Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Type (2015-2020)
Table 53. Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size by Application (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 54. Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Application (2015-2020)
Table 55. SGS Company Details
Table 56. SGS Business Overview
Table 57. SGS Product
Table 58. SGS Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 59. SGS Recent Development
Table 60. Netafim Company Details
Table 61. Netafim Business Overview
Table 62. Netafim Product
Table 63. Netafim Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 64. Netafim Recent Development
Table 65. SMART Fertilizer Management Company Details
Table 66. SMART Fertilizer Management Business Overview
Table 67. SMART Fertilizer Management Product
Table 68. SMART Fertilizer Management Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 69. SMART Fertilizer Management Recent Development
Table 70. TIMAC AGRO International Company Details
Table 71. TIMAC AGRO International Business Overview
Table 72. TIMAC AGRO International Product
Table 73. TIMAC AGRO International Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 74. TIMAC AGRO International Recent Development
Table 75. Autogrow Company Details
Table 76. Autogrow Business Overview
Table 77. Autogrow Product
Table 78. Autogrow Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 79. Autogrow Recent Development
Table 80. Banyan Water Company Details
Table 81. Banyan Water Business Overview
Table 82. Banyan Water Product
Table 83. Banyan Water Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Table 84. Banyan Water Recent Development
Table 85. Research Programs/Design for This Report
Table 86. Key Data Information from Secondary Sources
Table 87. Key Data Information from Primary Sources

List Of Figures

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Type: 2020 VS 2026
Figure 2. Monitoring Services with Testing Features
Figure 3. Monitoring Services without Testing Features
Figure 4. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Application: 2020 VS 2026
Figure 5. Agro-Industrial Companies Case Studies
Figure 6. Agricultural Institutes Case Studies
Figure 7. Others Case Studies
Figure 8. Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Report Years Considered
Figure 9. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size YoY Growth 2015-2026 (US$ Million)
Figure 10. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Regions: 2020 VS 2026
Figure 11. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Regions (2021-2026)
Figure 12. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Figure 13. Global Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Share by Players in 2019
Figure 14. Global Top Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Players by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) (based on the Revenue in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service as of 2019
Figure 15. The Top 10 and 5 Players Market Share by Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Revenue in 2019
Figure 16. North America Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Figure 17. Europe Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Figure 18. Asia-Pacific Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Market Size YoY Growth (2015-2020) (Million US$)
Figure 19. SGS Total Revenue (US$ Million): 2019 Compared with 2018
Figure 20. SGS Revenue Growth Rate in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
Figure 21. Netafim Total Revenue (US$ Million): 2019 Compared with 2018
Figure 22. Netafim Revenue Growth Rate in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
Figure 23. SMART Fertilizer Management Total Revenue (US$ Million): 2019 Compared with 2018
Figure 24. SMART Fertilizer Management Revenue Growth Rate in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
Figure 25. TIMAC AGRO International Total Revenue (US$ Million): 2019 Compared with 2018
Figure 26. TIMAC AGRO International Revenue Growth Rate in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
Figure 27. Autogrow Total Revenue (US$ Million): 2019 Compared with 2018
Figure 28. Autogrow Revenue Growth Rate in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
Figure 29. Banyan Water Total Revenue (US$ Million): 2019 Compared with 2018
Figure 30. Banyan Water Revenue Growth Rate in Remote Fertigation Monitoring Service Business (2015-2020)
Figure 31. Bottom-up and Top-down Approaches for This Report
Figure 32. Data Triangulation
Figure 33. Key Executives Interviewed