Global Third Party Optical Transceivers Market Outlook and Projections, 2019-2027

November 2019 | 53 pages | ID: G5D330032F1BEN
Research Nester Pvt. Ltd.

Abstracts

The demand for third-party transceivers is increasing on account of low costs offered to the consumers. The transceivers offered by Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) to the consumers are more expensive than third-party. For instance, the transceiver of Cisco 40GBASE-CSR4 QSFP+ is priced only USD 110 by “FS”, which is a key market player in third-party transceivers.

Further, third-party transceiver companies offer a wide range of transceivers with all forms factor at a low cost than OEMs. For instance, UNOPTIX offers 10G Copper SFP+ transceiver which has high demand in the data center application and is witnessing a dominating presence in the market due to less power consumption and convenient cost.

Additionally, Xtel Technologies offers optical transceivers including QSFP and QSFP28 majorly for data centers at a low price as compared to the original equipment manufacturers.

Moreover, increasing deployment of third-party transceivers in laboratory and manufacturing companies is estimated to drive the market growth during the forecast period. Companies are opting for third-party transceivers to reducing the costs on the expensive transceivers offered through OEMs.

Increase in the number of key players offering third-party transceivers is further estimated to fuel the market growth over the forthcoming years. A large number of third-party offer transceivers offer transceivers at a low cost and convenient customer support include SOPTO, ETU-Link Technology, curvature, EDGE Technologies Ltd, Huihong Technologies, Optcore, TXO Optics, UNOPTIX, DataLight Optics Inc and Xtel Technologies.

Contents

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Market Segmentation

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

2.1. Variables (Dependent and Independent)
2.2. Multi Factor Based Sensitivity Model

3. MARKET DYNAMICS

3.1. Drivers
3.2. Challenges
3.3. Opportunities
3.4 Trends

4. GLOBAL THIRD-PARTY OPTICAL TRANSCEIVER MARKET OUTLOOK

4.1. Market Size and Forecast, 2018-2027
  4.1.1. By Value (USD Million)
4.2. Market Share and Forecast, 2018-2027
  4.2.1. By Type
    4.2.1.1. Global Third-party Optical Transceiver Market, By Type (2018-2027F)
      4.2.1.1.1. SFP, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.1.2. XFP, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.1.3. QSFP, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.1.4. CFP, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.1.5. Others, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
  4.2.2. By End-User
    4.2.2.1. Global Third-party Optical Transceiver Market, By End-User (2018-2027F)
      4.2.1.2.1. Telecom, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.2.2. Data Center, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.2.3. Manufacturing, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.2.4. Others, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
  4.2.2. By Region
    4.2.2.1. Global Third-party Optical Transceiver Market, By Region (2018-2027F)
      4.2.1.2.1. North America, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.2.2. Europe, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.2.3. Asia Pacific, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.2.4. Latin America, 2018-2027F (USD Million)
      4.2.1.2.5. Middle East & Africa, 2018-2027F (USD Million)

5. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

5.1. Company Profiles
  5.1.1. Finisar Corporation
  5.1.2. Hummingbird Networks
  5.1.3. Champion ONE
  5.1.4. SOPTO
  5.1.5. ETU-Link Technology
  5.1.6. Curvature
  5.1.7. EDGE Technologies Ltd
  5.1.8. Huihong Technologies
  5.1.9. Optcore
  5.1.10. TXO Optics
    5.1.8.11 UNOPTIX
  5.1.12 DataLight Optics Inc
  5.1.13. Xtel Technologies
  5.1.14. FiberStore Co.
  5.1.15. AddOn Networks
  5.1.16. Prolabs