U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Equipment Type (PF, MBR, MBBR, SBR, IFAS), By Application (Municipal, Industrial), And Segment Forecast, 2025 - 2030
This report can be delivered to the clients within 3 Business Days
U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market Growth & Trends
The U.S. wastewater secondary treatment equipment market size is expected treach USD 3.11 billion by 2030, according ta new report by Grand View Research, Inc. It is projected tregister a CAGR of 3.1% from 2025 t2030. Rising demand for wastewater treatment plants owing tincreasing number of new users getting connected tcentralized treatment systems is expected ttranslate intupgradation of existing treatment facilities or construction of new wastewater treatment facilities.
A positive government outlook with respect tfunding coupled with stringent regulations and standards for wastewater treatment for both municipal and industrial sectors is expected tdrive the market over the forecast period. Wastewater secondary treatment equipment such as the Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) provides more effective removal of suspended and organic solids as it integrates the membrane filtration process with the conventional activated sludge process thereby offering advanced level filtration coupled with high-quality effluent.
Packaged MBR systems are becoming increasingly popular as they offer several benefits including small footprint, less installation and commissioning time, and reduced construction labor and engineering. In addition, these systems can be designed & assembled as per the customer specific requirements as well as the space available for installation. Factors such as population growth and ongoing new housing developments are expected tdrive the need for either new capacity construction or existing capacity expansion of municipal wastewater treatment plants which in turn is anticipated tdrive the demand in the municipal application segment.
U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market Report Highlights
U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market Growth & Trends
The U.S. wastewater secondary treatment equipment market size is expected treach USD 3.11 billion by 2030, according ta new report by Grand View Research, Inc. It is projected tregister a CAGR of 3.1% from 2025 t2030. Rising demand for wastewater treatment plants owing tincreasing number of new users getting connected tcentralized treatment systems is expected ttranslate intupgradation of existing treatment facilities or construction of new wastewater treatment facilities.
A positive government outlook with respect tfunding coupled with stringent regulations and standards for wastewater treatment for both municipal and industrial sectors is expected tdrive the market over the forecast period. Wastewater secondary treatment equipment such as the Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) provides more effective removal of suspended and organic solids as it integrates the membrane filtration process with the conventional activated sludge process thereby offering advanced level filtration coupled with high-quality effluent.
Packaged MBR systems are becoming increasingly popular as they offer several benefits including small footprint, less installation and commissioning time, and reduced construction labor and engineering. In addition, these systems can be designed & assembled as per the customer specific requirements as well as the space available for installation. Factors such as population growth and ongoing new housing developments are expected tdrive the need for either new capacity construction or existing capacity expansion of municipal wastewater treatment plants which in turn is anticipated tdrive the demand in the municipal application segment.
U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market Report Highlights
- The Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) segment is projected texpand at a CAGR of 3.7% from 2025 t2030 owing tits advantages in terms of operational flexibility and control coupled with suitability for applications with limited space availability
- The Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) segment is expected twitness substantial growth as they employ biofilm carriers that offer increased surface area for the microorganisms tgrow thereby reducing the overall footprint of the system
- The wastewater secondary treatment equipment demand in the industrial application segment accounted for a share of 38.9% in terms of revenue in 2024, owing tstringent effluent discharge regulations coupled with rising investments in various industrial sectors
- Market participants are investing in R&D in order tdevelop highly efficient products that cater tthe changing technological requirements from various end-use industries especially the ones with high wastewater volume
- For instance, in September 2018, Smith & Loveless launched a new design of its TITAN MBR that comprises of smart automation, touchscreen PLC controls, robust construction, and minimal O&M requirements
CHAPTER 1. METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE
1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Information Procurement
1.3.1. Purchased Database
1.3.2. GVR’s Internal Database
1.3.3. Secondary Sources & Third-Party Perspectives
1.3.4. Primary Research
1.4. Information Analysis
1.4.1. Data Analysis Models
1.5. Market Formulation & Data Visualization
1.6. Data Validation & Publishing
CHAPTER 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1. Market Insights
2.2. Segmental Outlook
2.3. Competitive Outlook
CHAPTER 3. U.S. WASTEWATER SECONDARY TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MARKET VARIABLES, TRENDS & SCOPE
3.1. U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market Outlook
3.2. Industry Value Chain Analysis
3.3. Application Overview
3.4. Average Price Trend Analysis
3.5. Supply-Demand Gap Analysis, 2024
3.6. Regulatory Framework
3.6.1. Policies and Incentive Plans
3.6.2. Standards and Compliances
3.6.3. Regulatory Impact Analysis
3.7. Market Dynamics
3.7.1. Market Driver Analysis
3.7.2. Market Restraint Analysis
3.7.3. Industry Challenges
3.8. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
3.8.1. Supplier Power
3.8.2. Buyer Power
3.8.3. Substitution Threat
3.8.4. Threat From New Entrant
3.8.5. Competitive Rivalry
3.9. PESTEL Analysis
3.9.1. Political Landscape
3.9.2. Economic Landscape
3.9.3. Social Landscape
3.9.4. Technological Landscape
3.9.5. Environmental Landscape
3.9.6. Legal Landscape
CHAPTER 4. U.S. WASTEWATER SECONDARY TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MARKET: EQUIPMENT TYPE OUTLOOK ESTIMATES & FORECASTS
4.1. U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market: Equipment Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030
4.1.1. Plug Flow (PF)
4.1.1.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.2. Complete-Mix Activated Sludge (CMAS)
4.1.2.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.3. Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)
4.1.3.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.4. Moving Bed Bioreactor (MBBR)
4.1.4.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.5. Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR)
4.1.5.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.6. Integrated Fixed-film Activated Sludge (IFAS)
4.1.6.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.7. Other
4.1.7.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
CHAPTER 5. U.S. WASTEWATER SECONDARY TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MARKET: APPLICATION OUTLOOK ESTIMATES & FORECASTS
5.1. U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market: Application Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030
5.1.1. Municipal
5.1.1.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
5.1.2. Industrial
5.1.2.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
CHAPTER 6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, By Key Market Participants
6.2. Vendor Landscape
6.2.1. Company Categorization
6.2.2. List Of Key Distributors and Channel Partners
6.2.3. List Of Potential Customers/End Users
6.3. Competitive Dynamics
6.3.1. Competitive Benchmarking
6.3.2. Strategy Mapping
6.3.3. Heat Map Analysis
6.4. Company Profiles/Listing
6.4.1. Xylem, Inc.
6.4.1.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.1.2. Financial Performance
6.4.1.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.1.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.2. Pentair plc
6.4.2.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.2.2. Financial Performance
6.4.2.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.2.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.3. Evoqua Water Technologies LLC
6.4.3.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.3.2. Financial Performance
6.4.3.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.3.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.4. Aquatech International LLC
6.4.4.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.4.2. Financial Performance
6.4.4.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.4.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.5. SUEZ
6.4.5.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.5.2. Financial Performance
6.4.5.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.5.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.6. Ecolab Inc.
6.4.6.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.6.2. Financial Performance
6.4.6.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.6.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.7. Calgon Carbon Corporation
6.4.7.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.7.2. Financial Performance
6.4.7.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.7.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.8. Toshiba Water Solutions Private Limited
6.4.8.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.8.2. Financial Performance
6.4.8.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.8.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.9. Veolia
6.4.9.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.9.2. Financial Performance
6.4.9.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.9.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.10. Ecologix Entertainment Systems, LLC
6.4.10.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.10.2. Financial Performance
6.4.10.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.10.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.11. Parkson Corporation
6.4.11.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.11.2. Financial Performance
6.4.11.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.11.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.12. Lenntech B.V.
6.4.12.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.12.2. Financial Performance
6.4.12.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.12.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.13. H2O Innovation
6.4.13.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.13.2. Financial Performance
6.4.13.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.13.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.14. Smith & Loveless
6.4.14.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.14.2. Financial Performance
6.4.14.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.14.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.15. Samco Technologies, Inc.
6.4.15.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.15.2. Financial Performance
6.4.15.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.15.4. Strategic Initiatives
1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Information Procurement
1.3.1. Purchased Database
1.3.2. GVR’s Internal Database
1.3.3. Secondary Sources & Third-Party Perspectives
1.3.4. Primary Research
1.4. Information Analysis
1.4.1. Data Analysis Models
1.5. Market Formulation & Data Visualization
1.6. Data Validation & Publishing
CHAPTER 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1. Market Insights
2.2. Segmental Outlook
2.3. Competitive Outlook
CHAPTER 3. U.S. WASTEWATER SECONDARY TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MARKET VARIABLES, TRENDS & SCOPE
3.1. U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market Outlook
3.2. Industry Value Chain Analysis
3.3. Application Overview
3.4. Average Price Trend Analysis
3.5. Supply-Demand Gap Analysis, 2024
3.6. Regulatory Framework
3.6.1. Policies and Incentive Plans
3.6.2. Standards and Compliances
3.6.3. Regulatory Impact Analysis
3.7. Market Dynamics
3.7.1. Market Driver Analysis
3.7.2. Market Restraint Analysis
3.7.3. Industry Challenges
3.8. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
3.8.1. Supplier Power
3.8.2. Buyer Power
3.8.3. Substitution Threat
3.8.4. Threat From New Entrant
3.8.5. Competitive Rivalry
3.9. PESTEL Analysis
3.9.1. Political Landscape
3.9.2. Economic Landscape
3.9.3. Social Landscape
3.9.4. Technological Landscape
3.9.5. Environmental Landscape
3.9.6. Legal Landscape
CHAPTER 4. U.S. WASTEWATER SECONDARY TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MARKET: EQUIPMENT TYPE OUTLOOK ESTIMATES & FORECASTS
4.1. U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market: Equipment Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030
4.1.1. Plug Flow (PF)
4.1.1.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.2. Complete-Mix Activated Sludge (CMAS)
4.1.2.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.3. Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)
4.1.3.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.4. Moving Bed Bioreactor (MBBR)
4.1.4.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.5. Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR)
4.1.5.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.6. Integrated Fixed-film Activated Sludge (IFAS)
4.1.6.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
4.1.7. Other
4.1.7.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
CHAPTER 5. U.S. WASTEWATER SECONDARY TREATMENT EQUIPMENT MARKET: APPLICATION OUTLOOK ESTIMATES & FORECASTS
5.1. U.S. Wastewater Secondary Treatment Equipment Market: Application Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030
5.1.1. Municipal
5.1.1.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
5.1.2. Industrial
5.1.2.1. Market Estimates and Forecast, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
CHAPTER 6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, By Key Market Participants
6.2. Vendor Landscape
6.2.1. Company Categorization
6.2.2. List Of Key Distributors and Channel Partners
6.2.3. List Of Potential Customers/End Users
6.3. Competitive Dynamics
6.3.1. Competitive Benchmarking
6.3.2. Strategy Mapping
6.3.3. Heat Map Analysis
6.4. Company Profiles/Listing
6.4.1. Xylem, Inc.
6.4.1.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.1.2. Financial Performance
6.4.1.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.1.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.2. Pentair plc
6.4.2.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.2.2. Financial Performance
6.4.2.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.2.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.3. Evoqua Water Technologies LLC
6.4.3.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.3.2. Financial Performance
6.4.3.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.3.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.4. Aquatech International LLC
6.4.4.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.4.2. Financial Performance
6.4.4.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.4.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.5. SUEZ
6.4.5.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.5.2. Financial Performance
6.4.5.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.5.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.6. Ecolab Inc.
6.4.6.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.6.2. Financial Performance
6.4.6.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.6.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.7. Calgon Carbon Corporation
6.4.7.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.7.2. Financial Performance
6.4.7.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.7.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.8. Toshiba Water Solutions Private Limited
6.4.8.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.8.2. Financial Performance
6.4.8.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.8.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.9. Veolia
6.4.9.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.9.2. Financial Performance
6.4.9.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.9.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.10. Ecologix Entertainment Systems, LLC
6.4.10.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.10.2. Financial Performance
6.4.10.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.10.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.11. Parkson Corporation
6.4.11.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.11.2. Financial Performance
6.4.11.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.11.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.12. Lenntech B.V.
6.4.12.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.12.2. Financial Performance
6.4.12.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.12.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.13. H2O Innovation
6.4.13.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.13.2. Financial Performance
6.4.13.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.13.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.14. Smith & Loveless
6.4.14.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.14.2. Financial Performance
6.4.14.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.14.4. Strategic Initiatives
6.4.15. Samco Technologies, Inc.
6.4.15.1. Participant’s Overview
6.4.15.2. Financial Performance
6.4.15.3. Product Benchmarking
6.4.15.4. Strategic Initiatives
