- The report contains detailed information about Petrohawk Energy Corporation that gives an unrivalled in-depth knowledge about internal business-environment of the company: data about the owners, senior executives, locations, subsidiaries, markets, products, and company history.
- Another part of the report is a SWOT-analysis carried out for Petrohawk Energy Corporation. It involves specifying the objective of the company's business and identifies the different factors that are favorable and unfavorable to achieving that objective. SWOT-analysis helps to understand company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and possible threats against it.
- The Petrohawk Energy Corporation financial analysis covers the income statement and ratio trend-charts with balance sheets and cash flows presented on an annual and quarterly basis. The report outlines the main financial ratios pertaining to profitability, margin analysis, asset turnover, credit ratios, and company’s long-term solvency. This sort of company's information will assist and strengthen your company’s decision-making processes.
- In the part that describes Petrohawk Energy Corporation competitors and the industry in whole, the information about company's financial ratios is compared to those of its competitors and to the industry. The unique analysis of the market and company’s competitors along with detailed information about the internal and external factors affecting the relevant industry will help to manage your business environment. Your company’s business and sales activities will be boosted by gaining an insight into your competitors’ businesses.
- Also the report provides relevant news, an analysis of PR-activity, and stock price movements. The latter are correlated with pertinent news and press releases, and annual and quarterly forecasts are given by a variety of experts and market research firms. Such information creates your awareness about principal trends of Petrohawk Energy Corporation business.
About Petrohawk Energy Corporation
Petrohawk Energy Corporation, an independent oil and natural gas company, engages in the acquisition, development, production, and exploration of oil and natural gas properties located onshore in the United States.
The company organizes its oil and natural gas operations into two principal regions, including the Mid-Continent, which includes its Louisiana, Arkansas and East Texas properties; and the Western, which includes its South Texas and Oklahoma properties.
In the Mid-Continent Region, the company focuses on drilling program primarily in North Louisiana, East Texas and in the Fayetteville Shale in the Arkoma Basin. During 2009, it drilled 573 wells in this region (of which 111 were operated and 462 were non-operated).
Haynesville Shale: The company owns leasehold interests in approximately 360,000 net acres in the area. It is targeting lateral lengths between 4,300 feet and 4,800 feet with approximately 15 fracture stages. As of December 31, 2009, it had approximately 70 operated wells on production in North Louisiana producing approximately 480 Mmcfe/d gross. During 2009, the company drilled 184 wells.
Bossier Shale: The company owns leasehold interests in approximately 122,000 net acres.
Elm Grove and Caspiana Fields: It is located primarily in Bossier and Caddo Parishes of North Louisiana. During 2009, the company drilled one operated well and 13 non-operated wells.
Fayetteville Shale: The Fayetteville Shale is located in the Arkoma Basin in Arkansas, at a depth of approximately 1,500 feet to 6,500 feet and ranging in thickness from 100 feet to 500 feet. The company is drilling horizontal wells with lateral lengths of 2,500 feet to 3,000 feet and utilizing slickwater fracture stimulation completions.
During 2009, the majority of the Western Region assets were in the Hawkville Field which is located in the Eagle Ford Shale play in South Texas. The Western Region also contains property that is located in Oklahoma plus other properties located in the Anadarko and Arkoma Basins. During 2009, the company drilled 53 productive wells (24 operated and 29 non-operated) with no dry holes.
Eagle Ford Shale: The company has approximately 310,000 net acres under lease or option to lease in the Eagle Ford Shale in the Hawkville Field, located in LaSalle and McMullen Counties, Texas and the Red Hawk area located in Zavala County, Texas.
The company has 20 operated and 4 non-operated producing wells plus 4 additional wells that are pending completion and 3 wells that were drilling in this field. Its Eagle Ford Shale wells have averaged a vertical depth that ranges from 10,850 feet to 12,150 feet.
In 2008, the company, through its subsidiary, Hawk Field Services, LLC, initiated construction of its own gathering systems and treating facilities to service its operated wells and third party production from the Fayetteville and Haynesville Shales.
Haynesville Shale: As of December 31, 2009, the company had constructed approximately 150 miles of primarily 16-inch diameter pipeline in various of its drilling areas. Its Haynesville Shale system throughput was 445 Mmcf/d with a capacity of 1.4 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day (Bcf/d) and a treating capacity of 735 Mmcf/d as of December 31, 2009.
Eagle Ford Shale: During 2009, the company initiated construction of a high pressure gathering system to transport its production to various intrastate and interstate pipelines. Its Eagle Ford Shale system has a throughput capacity of 550 Mmcf/d and a treating capacity of 100 Mmcf/d as of December 31, 2009.
Fayetteville Shale: To support its operations, the company completed construction of three separate gathering systems which represent approximately 106 miles of pipelines that gather natural gas from its operated wells and transport it to interconnects with various interstate pipelines. As of December 31, 2009, its Fayetteville system consists of six-inch to 16-inch diameter pipelines with throughput capacity of approximately 200 Mmcf/d.
As of December 31, 2009, the companys estimated total proved oil and natural gas reserves included approximately 2,750 billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent (Bcfe), consisting of 8 million barrels (MMBbls) of oil, and 2,700 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas and natural gas liquids. As of December 31, 2009, its estimated proved undeveloped (PUD) reserves were approximately 1,845 Bcfe.
In 2009, the company purchased outstanding membership interests in Kaiser Trading, LLC (Kaiser). Kaisers assets were transportation-related contracts, including a firm transportation contract, interruptible gas transportation service agreement, parking and lending services agreement, and a pooling services agreement.
In 2009, the company sold its Permian Basin properties.
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP announced on May 21, 2010 that it completed the purchase of a 50% interest in Petrohawk Energy Corp.'s natural gas gathering and treating business in the Haynesville Shale.
Petrohawk Energy Corporation was founded in 1997.
The above Company Fundamental Report is a half-ready report and contents are subject to change.
It means that we have all necessary data in our database to prepare the report but need 2-3 days to complete it. During this time we are also updating the report with respect to the current moment. So, you can get all the most recent data available for the same price. Please note that preparation of additional types of analyses requires extra time.
1. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION COMPANY PROFILE
1.1. Key facts
1.2. Financial Performance
1.3. Key Executives
1.4. Ownership and Major Holders
1.5. Company History
2. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION BUSINESS OVERVIEW
2.1. Business Description
2.2. Major Products and Services
2.3. Markets and Sales Activities
2.4. Locations, Subsidiaries, Operating Units
3. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION SWOT ANALYSIS
4. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
4.1. Financial Statements
4.1.1. Income Statement
4.1.2. Balance Sheet
4.1.3. Cash Flow
4.2. Financial Ratios
4.2.2. Margin Analysis
4.2.3. Asset Turnover
4.2.4. Credit Ratios
4.2.5. Long-Term Solvency
4.2.6. Growth Over Prior Year
4.2.7. Financial Ratios Charts
4.3. Stock Market Snapshot
5. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION COMPETITORS AND INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
5.1. Petrohawk Energy Corporation Direct Competitors
5.2. Comparison of Petrohawk Energy Corporation and Direct Competitors Financial Ratios
5.3. Comparison of Petrohawk Energy Corporation and Direct Competitors Stock Charts
5.4. Petrohawk Energy Corporation Industry Analysis
5.4.1. Energy Industry Snapshot
5.4.2. Petrohawk Energy Corporation Industry Position Analysis
6. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION NEWS & EVENTS
6.1. News & PR Activity Analysis
6.2. IR Corporate News
6.3. Marketing News
6.4. Corporate Events
7. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION EXPERTS REVIEW1
7.1. Experts Opinion
7.2. Experts Estimates
8. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION ENHANCED SWOT ANALYSIS2
9. UNITED STATES PESTEL ANALYSIS2
9.1. Political Factors
9.2. Economic Factors
9.3. Social Factors
9.4. Technological Factors
9.5. Environmental Factors
9.6. Legal Factors
10. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION IFE, EFE, IE MATRICES2
10.1. Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.2. External Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.3. Internal External Matrix
11. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION PORTER FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS2
12. PETROHAWK ENERGY CORPORATION VRIO ANALYSIS2
APPENDIX: RATIO DEFINITIONS
LIST OF TABLES
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Key Facts
Income Statement Key Figures
Balance Sheet Key Figures
Cash Flow Statement Key Figures
Financial Performance Abbreviation Guide
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Key Executives
Key Executives Biographies1
Key Executives Compensations1
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Major Shareholders
Petrohawk Energy Corporation History
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Products
Revenues by Segment
Revenues by Region
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Offices and Representations
Petrohawk Energy Corporation SWOT Analysis
Yearly Income Statement Including Trends
Income Statement Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Balance Sheet Including Trends
Balance Sheet Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Cash Flow Including Trends
Cash Flow Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Profitability Ratios
Margin Analysis Ratios
Asset Turnover Ratios
Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Financial Ratios Growth Over Prior Year
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Capital Market Snapshot
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Direct Competitors Key Facts
Direct Competitors Profitability Ratios
Direct Competitors Margin Analysis Ratios
Direct Competitors Asset Turnover Ratios
Direct Competitors Credit Ratios
Direct Competitors Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Energy Industry Statistics
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Industry Position
Company vs. Industry Income Statement Analysis
Company vs. Industry Balance Sheet Analysis
Company vs. Industry Cash Flow Analysis
Company vs. Industry Ratios Comparison
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Consensus Recommendations1
Analyst Recommendation Summary1
Price Target Summary1
Experts Recommendation Trends1
Revenue Estimates Analysis1
Earnings Estimates Analysis1
Revenue Estimates Trend1
Earnings Estimates Trend1
LIST OF FIGURES
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Annual Revenues in Comparison with Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit
Profit Margin Chart
Operating Margin Chart
Return on Equity (ROE) Chart
Return on Assets (ROA) Chart
Debt to Equity Chart
Current Ratio Chart
Petrohawk Energy Corporation 1-year Stock Charts
Petrohawk Energy Corporation 5-year Stock Charts
Petrohawk Energy Corporation vs. Main Indexes 1-year Stock Chart
Petrohawk Energy Corporation vs. Direct Competitors 1-year Stock Charts
Petrohawk Energy Corporation Article Density Chart
1 – Data availability depends on company’s security policy.
2 – These sections are available only when you purchase a report with appropriate additional types of analyses.
The complete financial data is available for publicly traded companies.
Enhanced SWOT Analysis
Enhanced SWOT is a 3×3 grid that arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats into one scheme:
- How to use the strengths to take advantage of the opportunities?
- How to use the strengths to reduce likelihood and impact of the threats?
- How to overcome the weaknesses that obstruct taking advantage of the opportunities?
- How to overcome the weaknesses that can make the threats a reality?
Upon answering these questions a company can develop a project plan to improve its business performance.
PESTEL (also termed as PESTLE) is an ideal tool to strategically analyze what influence different outside factors – political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental and legal – exert on a business to later chart its long term targets.
Being part of the external analysis when carrying out a strategic assessment or performing a market study, PESTEL gives an overview of diverse macro-environmental factors that any company should thoughtfully consider. By perceiving these outside environments, businesses can maximally benefit from the opportunities while minimizing the threats to the organization.
Key Factors Examined by PESTEL Analysis:
- Political – What opportunities and pressures are brought by political bodies and what is the degree of public regulations’ impact on the business?
- Economic – What economic policies, trends and structures are expected to affect the organization, what is this influence’s degree?
- Sociological – What cultural and societal aspects will work upon the demand for the business’s products and operations?
- Technological – What impact do the technological aspects, innovations, incentives and barriers have on the organization?
- Environmental – What environmental and ecological facets, both locally and farther afield, are likely to predetermine the business?
- Legal – What laws and legislation will exert influence on the style the business is carried out?
IFE, EFE, IE Matrices
The Internal Factor Evaluation matrix (IFE matrix) is a strategic management tool helping audit or evaluate major weaknesses and strengths in a business’s functional areas. In addition, IFE matrix serves as a basis for identifying and assessing relationships amongst those areas. The IFE matrix is utilised in strategy formulation.
The External Factor Evaluation matrix (EFE matrix) is a tool of strategic management that is typically utilised to assess current market conditions. It is an ideal instrument for visualising and prioritising the threats and opportunities a firm is facing.
The essential difference between the above mentioned matrices lies in the type of factors incorporated in the model; whilst the latter is engaged in internal factors, the former deals exceptionally with external factors – those exposed to social, political, economic, legal, etc. external forces.
Being a continuation of the EFE matrix and IFE matrix models, the Internal External matrix (IE matrix) rests upon an investigation of external and internal business factors integrated into one suggestive model.
Porter Five Forces Analysis
The Porter’s five forces analysis studies the industry of operation and helps the company find new sources of competitive advantage. The analysis surveys an industry through five major questions:
- What composes a threat of substitute products and services?
- Is there a threat of new competitors entering the market?
- What is the intensity of competitive rivalry?
- How big is the bargaining power of buyers?
- How significant is the bargaining power of suppliers?
VRIO stands for Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization. This analysis helps to evaluate all company’s resources and capabilities and bring them together into one aggregate table that includes:
- Tangible resources
- Intangible resources
- Innovation and Creativity
- Organizational capabilities
The result of the analysis gives a clear picture of company’s competitive and economic implications, answering the questions if the resources mentioned above are:
- Costly to imitate?
- Organized properly?