- The report contains detailed information about Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. that gives an unrivalled in-depth knowledge about internal business-environment of the company: data about the owners, senior executives, locations, subsidiaries, markets, products, and company history.
- Another part of the report is a SWOT-analysis carried out for Oxford Resource Partners, L.P.. It involves specifying the objective of the company's business and identifies the different factors that are favorable and unfavorable to achieving that objective. SWOT-analysis helps to understand company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and possible threats against it.
- The Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. financial analysis covers the income statement and ratio trend-charts with balance sheets and cash flows presented on an annual and quarterly basis. The report outlines the main financial ratios pertaining to profitability, margin analysis, asset turnover, credit ratios, and company’s long-term solvency. This sort of company's information will assist and strengthen your company’s decision-making processes.
- In the part that describes Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. competitors and the industry in whole, the information about company's financial ratios is compared to those of its competitors and to the industry. The unique analysis of the market and company’s competitors along with detailed information about the internal and external factors affecting the relevant industry will help to manage your business environment. Your company’s business and sales activities will be boosted by gaining an insight into your competitors’ businesses.
- Also the report provides relevant news, an analysis of PR-activity, and stock price movements. The latter are correlated with pertinent news and press releases, and annual and quarterly forecasts are given by a variety of experts and market research firms. Such information creates your awareness about principal trends of Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. business.
About Oxford Resource Partners, L.P.
Oxford Resource Partners, LP engages in the production and marketing of steam coal and surface mined coal in Ohio. The companys reserves and operations are located in Northern Appalachia and the Illinois Basin to serve its primary market area of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia.
As of December 31, 2009, the company controlled 91.6 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves, of which 68.6 million tons were associated with its surface mining operations and the remaining 23.0 million tons consisted of underground coal reserves.
The company has 19 active surface mines that are managed as 8 mining complexes. The companys transportation facilities include 2 river terminals and 2 rail loading facilities. Its mining facilities include 2 wash plants, 6 blending facilities, and 9 crushing facilities.
The company operates seven surface mining complexes in Northern Appalachia, which are located in eastern Ohio.
Cadiz Mining Complex: The Cadiz mining complex is located in Harrison County, Ohio and includes reserves located in Jefferson County, Ohio and Washington County, Pennsylvania and consists of the Daron and County Road 29 mines. Operations at the Cadiz mining complex target the Pittsburgh #8, Redstone #8A and Meigs Creek #9 coal seams. As of December 31, 2009, the Cadiz mining complex included 12.4 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
Tuscarawas County Mining Complex: The Tuscarawas County mining complex is located in Tuscarawas, Columbiana and Stark Counties, Ohio, and consists of the Stonecreek, Stillwater, Chumney, and Strasburg mines. Operations at this mining complex target the Brookville #4, Lower Kittanning #5, Middle Kittanning #6, Upper Freeport #7, and Mahoning #7A coal seams. As of December 31, 2009, the Tuscarawas County mining complex included 8.8 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
Belmont County Mining Complex: The Belmont County mining complex is located in Belmont County, Ohio, and consists of the Lafferty, Boswell, Flushing, and Wheeling Valley mines. Operations at the Belmont County mining complex target the Pittsburgh #8 and Meigs Creek #9 coal seams. As of December 31, 2009, the Belmont County mining complex included 6.6 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
Plainfield Mining Complex: The Plainfield mining complex is located in Muskingum, Guernsey and Coshocton Counties, Ohio, and consists of the Plainfield mine. Operations at the Plainfield mining complex target the Middle Kittanning #6 coal seam. As of December 31, 2009, the Plainfield mining complex included 6.4 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
New Lexington Mining Complex: The New Lexington mining complex is located in Perry, Athens and Morgan Counties, Ohio, and consists of the New Lexington mine. Operations at the New Lexington mining complex target the Lower Kittanning #5 and Middle Kittanning #6 coal seams. As of December 31, 2009, the New Lexington mining complex included 4.9 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
Harrison Mining Complex: The Harrison mining complex is located in Harrison County, Ohio, and consists of the Harrison mine. The Harrison mining complex is owned by Harrison Resources, LLC (Harrison Resources). The company owns 51% of Harrison Resources and CONSOL Energy, Inc. owns the remaining 49% indirectly through its subsidiary. Operations at the Harrison mining complex target the Pittsburgh #8, Redstone #8A and Meigs Creek #9 coal seams. As of December 31, 2009, the Harrison mining complex included 2.8 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
Noble County Mining Complex: The Noble County mining complex is located in Noble and Guernsey Counties, Ohio, and consists of the Long-Sears and Halls Knob mines. Operations at the Noble County mining complex target the Pittsburgh #8 and Meigs Creek #9 coal seams. As of December 31, 2009, the Noble County mining complex included 2.5 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
The company operates one surface mining complex in the Illinois Basin, which is located in western Kentucky.
Muhlenberg County Mining Complex: The Muhlenberg County mining complex is located in Muhlenberg and McClean Counties, which is in western Kentucky, and consists of the Schoate/431, Winn, Jessup and KO mines. Operations at the Muhlenberg County mining complex target the #5, #6, #9, #10, #11, #12 and #13 coal seams of the Illinois Basin. As of December 31, 2009, the Muhlenberg County mining complex included 24.2 million tons of proven and probable coal reserves.
The company markets the majority of the coal it produces to base-load power plants in its six-state market area under long-term coal sales contracts. Its primary customers are major electric utilities, municipalities and cooperatives, and industrial customers. For the period ended December 31, 2009, the companys major customers were AEP, East Kentucky Power Cooperative, and Duke Energy.
The companys main competitors include Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.; Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.; Armstrong Coal Company; Buckingham Coal Co., Inc.; The Cline Group; CONSOL Energy; Massey Energy Company; Murray Energy Corporation; Patriot Coal Corp.; Peabody Energy, Inc.; and Rhino Mining Inc.
On September 21, 2010, Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. and Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. announced their collaborative agreement to develop a pilot project to produce Mendel's proprietary Miscanthus varieties on land previously reclaimed from mining operations by Oxford.
Oxford Resource Partners, LP was founded in 1985.
The above Company Fundamental Report is a half-ready report and contents are subject to change.
It means that we have all necessary data in our database to prepare the report but need 2-3 days to complete it. During this time we are also updating the report with respect to the current moment. So, you can get all the most recent data available for the same price. Please note that preparation of additional types of analyses requires extra time.
1. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. COMPANY PROFILE
1.1. Key facts
1.2. Financial Performance
1.3. Key Executives
1.4. Ownership and Major Holders
1.5. Company History
2. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. BUSINESS OVERVIEW
2.1. Business Description
2.2. Major Products and Services
2.3. Markets and Sales Activities
2.4. Locations, Subsidiaries, Operating Units
3. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. SWOT ANALYSIS
4. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
4.1. Financial Statements
4.1.1. Income Statement
4.1.2. Balance Sheet
4.1.3. Cash Flow
4.2. Financial Ratios
4.2.2. Margin Analysis
4.2.3. Asset Turnover
4.2.4. Credit Ratios
4.2.5. Long-Term Solvency
4.2.6. Growth Over Prior Year
4.2.7. Financial Ratios Charts
4.3. Stock Market Snapshot
5. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. COMPETITORS AND INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
5.1. Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Direct Competitors
5.2. Comparison of Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. and Direct Competitors Financial Ratios
5.3. Comparison of Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. and Direct Competitors Stock Charts
5.4. Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Industry Analysis
5.4.1. Energy Industry Snapshot
5.4.2. Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Industry Position Analysis
6. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. NEWS & EVENTS
6.1. News & PR Activity Analysis
6.2. IR Corporate News
6.3. Marketing News
6.4. Corporate Events
7. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. EXPERTS REVIEW1
7.1. Experts Opinion
7.2. Experts Estimates
8. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. ENHANCED SWOT ANALYSIS2
9. UNITED STATES PESTEL ANALYSIS2
9.1. Political Factors
9.2. Economic Factors
9.3. Social Factors
9.4. Technological Factors
9.5. Environmental Factors
9.6. Legal Factors
10. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. IFE, EFE, IE MATRICES2
10.1. Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.2. External Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.3. Internal External Matrix
11. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. PORTER FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS2
12. OXFORD RESOURCE PARTNERS, L.P. VRIO ANALYSIS2
APPENDIX: RATIO DEFINITIONS
LIST OF TABLES
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Key Facts
Income Statement Key Figures
Balance Sheet Key Figures
Cash Flow Statement Key Figures
Financial Performance Abbreviation Guide
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Key Executives
Key Executives Biographies1
Key Executives Compensations1
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Major Shareholders
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. History
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Products
Revenues by Segment
Revenues by Region
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Offices and Representations
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. SWOT Analysis
Yearly Income Statement Including Trends
Income Statement Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Balance Sheet Including Trends
Balance Sheet Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Cash Flow Including Trends
Cash Flow Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Profitability Ratios
Margin Analysis Ratios
Asset Turnover Ratios
Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Financial Ratios Growth Over Prior Year
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Capital Market Snapshot
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Direct Competitors Key Facts
Direct Competitors Profitability Ratios
Direct Competitors Margin Analysis Ratios
Direct Competitors Asset Turnover Ratios
Direct Competitors Credit Ratios
Direct Competitors Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Energy Industry Statistics
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Industry Position
Company vs. Industry Income Statement Analysis
Company vs. Industry Balance Sheet Analysis
Company vs. Industry Cash Flow Analysis
Company vs. Industry Ratios Comparison
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Consensus Recommendations1
Analyst Recommendation Summary1
Price Target Summary1
Experts Recommendation Trends1
Revenue Estimates Analysis1
Earnings Estimates Analysis1
Revenue Estimates Trend1
Earnings Estimates Trend1
LIST OF FIGURES
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Annual Revenues in Comparison with Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit
Profit Margin Chart
Operating Margin Chart
Return on Equity (ROE) Chart
Return on Assets (ROA) Chart
Debt to Equity Chart
Current Ratio Chart
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. 1-year Stock Charts
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. 5-year Stock Charts
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. vs. Main Indexes 1-year Stock Chart
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. vs. Direct Competitors 1-year Stock Charts
Oxford Resource Partners, L.P. Article Density Chart
1 – Data availability depends on company’s security policy.
2 – These sections are available only when you purchase a report with appropriate additional types of analyses.
The complete financial data is available for publicly traded companies.
Enhanced SWOT Analysis
Enhanced SWOT is a 3×3 grid that arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats into one scheme:
- How to use the strengths to take advantage of the opportunities?
- How to use the strengths to reduce likelihood and impact of the threats?
- How to overcome the weaknesses that obstruct taking advantage of the opportunities?
- How to overcome the weaknesses that can make the threats a reality?
Upon answering these questions a company can develop a project plan to improve its business performance.
PESTEL (also termed as PESTLE) is an ideal tool to strategically analyze what influence different outside factors – political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental and legal – exert on a business to later chart its long term targets.
Being part of the external analysis when carrying out a strategic assessment or performing a market study, PESTEL gives an overview of diverse macro-environmental factors that any company should thoughtfully consider. By perceiving these outside environments, businesses can maximally benefit from the opportunities while minimizing the threats to the organization.
Key Factors Examined by PESTEL Analysis:
- Political – What opportunities and pressures are brought by political bodies and what is the degree of public regulations’ impact on the business?
- Economic – What economic policies, trends and structures are expected to affect the organization, what is this influence’s degree?
- Sociological – What cultural and societal aspects will work upon the demand for the business’s products and operations?
- Technological – What impact do the technological aspects, innovations, incentives and barriers have on the organization?
- Environmental – What environmental and ecological facets, both locally and farther afield, are likely to predetermine the business?
- Legal – What laws and legislation will exert influence on the style the business is carried out?
IFE, EFE, IE Matrices
The Internal Factor Evaluation matrix (IFE matrix) is a strategic management tool helping audit or evaluate major weaknesses and strengths in a business’s functional areas. In addition, IFE matrix serves as a basis for identifying and assessing relationships amongst those areas. The IFE matrix is utilised in strategy formulation.
The External Factor Evaluation matrix (EFE matrix) is a tool of strategic management that is typically utilised to assess current market conditions. It is an ideal instrument for visualising and prioritising the threats and opportunities a firm is facing.
The essential difference between the above mentioned matrices lies in the type of factors incorporated in the model; whilst the latter is engaged in internal factors, the former deals exceptionally with external factors – those exposed to social, political, economic, legal, etc. external forces.
Being a continuation of the EFE matrix and IFE matrix models, the Internal External matrix (IE matrix) rests upon an investigation of external and internal business factors integrated into one suggestive model.
Porter Five Forces Analysis
The Porter’s five forces analysis studies the industry of operation and helps the company find new sources of competitive advantage. The analysis surveys an industry through five major questions:
- What composes a threat of substitute products and services?
- Is there a threat of new competitors entering the market?
- What is the intensity of competitive rivalry?
- How big is the bargaining power of buyers?
- How significant is the bargaining power of suppliers?
VRIO stands for Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization. This analysis helps to evaluate all company’s resources and capabilities and bring them together into one aggregate table that includes:
- Tangible resources
- Intangible resources
- Innovation and Creativity
- Organizational capabilities
The result of the analysis gives a clear picture of company’s competitive and economic implications, answering the questions if the resources mentioned above are:
- Costly to imitate?
- Organized properly?