Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Fundamental Company Report Including Financial, SWOT, Competitors and Industry Analysis

Date: October 15, 2016
Pages: 50
US$ 499.00
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Fundamental Company Report Including Financial, SWOT, Competitors and Industry Analysis
Publisher: BAC Reports
Report type: Strategic Report
Delivery: E-mail Delivery - PDF (on default),
Hard Copy Mail Delivery (+US$ 190.00)
ID: N1BB454107FBEN

Download PDF Leaflet

Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Fundamental Company Report Including Financial, SWOT, Competitors and Industry Analysis
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Fundamental Company Report provides a complete overview of the company’s affairs. All available data is presented in a comprehensive and easily accessed format. The report includes financial and SWOT information, industry analysis, opinions, estimates, plus annual and quarterly forecasts made by stock market experts. The report also enables direct comparison to be made between Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC and its competitors. This provides our Clients with a clear understanding of Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC position in the Energy Industry.

  • The report contains detailed information about Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC that gives an unrivalled in-depth knowledge about internal business-environment of the company: data about the owners, senior executives, locations, subsidiaries, markets, products, and company history.
  • Another part of the report is a SWOT-analysis carried out for Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC. It involves specifying the objective of the company's business and identifies the different factors that are favorable and unfavorable to achieving that objective. SWOT-analysis helps to understand company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and possible threats against it.
  • The Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC financial analysis covers the income statement and ratio trend-charts with balance sheets and cash flows presented on an annual and quarterly basis. The report outlines the main financial ratios pertaining to profitability, margin analysis, asset turnover, credit ratios, and company’s long-term solvency. This sort of company's information will assist and strengthen your company’s decision-making processes.
  • In the part that describes Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC competitors and the industry in whole, the information about company's financial ratios is compared to those of its competitors and to the industry. The unique analysis of the market and company’s competitors along with detailed information about the internal and external factors affecting the relevant industry will help to manage your business environment. Your company’s business and sales activities will be boosted by gaining an insight into your competitors’ businesses.
  • Also the report provides relevant news, an analysis of PR-activity, and stock price movements. The latter are correlated with pertinent news and press releases, and annual and quarterly forecasts are given by a variety of experts and market research firms. Such information creates your awareness about principal trends of Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC business.

About Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC

Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC engages in the ownership and operation of natural gas storage assets in North America.

The company owns or contracts for approximately 185.5 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of gas storage capacity. Its assets are located in North American natural gas producing and consuming regions.


The company owns and operates gas storage facilities consist of AECO Hub, its Wild Goose storage facility in northern California, and its Salt Plains storage facility in Oklahoma.


AECO Hub, the company’s primary operation, includes two facilities in Alberta, Suffield and Countess, which are 75 miles apart but operate as one hub. AECO Hub is the natural gas storage provider in western Canada and the independent storage hub in North America. Its location on TransCanada Pipeline's Alberta System with direct access to western Canadian natural gas supply and pipeline connections to major the U.S. and Canadian natural gas markets. AECO Hub is located in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), which is the major hydrocarbon basin in Canada. AECO Suffield and AECO Countess are the two facilities that make up the AECO Hub.

Suffield Storage Facility: AECO Suffield is located in southeastern Alberta. AECO Suffield consists of 60 storage wells and 5 storage reservoirs with working capacity of approximately 80.0 Bcf. Compression is provided by natural gas powered engines that have a approximately 36,000 horsepower.

Countess Storage Facility: AECO Countess is located in south central Alberta, approximately 60 miles east of Calgary. This gas storage project consists of 29 storage wells and 2 gas storage reservoirs that are connected to a central processing and compression facility. Compression is electrically powered and approximately 34,500 horsepower. The 2 reservoirs have working capacity of approximately 55.0 Bcf.

Wild Goose

The company’s Wild Goose storage facility is located 55 miles north of Sacramento, California. Wild Goose is a deliverability, multi-cycle (HDMC) storage facility with an average physical cycling capability of 2.5 cycles per year. Wild Goose provides natural gas receipt and delivery services at Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E citygate) a liquid trading point where gas supply from multiple upstream basins meets the California end-use gas demands that create a dependence on natural gas storage. Wild Goose is connected to 2 PG&E interconnect points—Line 167 (a local transmission line), which is situated adjacent to the facility, and PG&E's Line 400/401 (the large diameter backbone pipelines) via its own 25 mile, 30 inch connector pipeline. Wild Goose operates 12 gas storage wells that are completed in 2 depleted natural gas reservoirs with a working capacity of 29.0 Bcf and a gas generated compression of 20,800 horsepower.

Salt Plains

The company’s Salt Plains storage facility is located 110 miles north of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Salt Plains provides intrastate services in Oklahoma through its connection to pipelines operated by ONEOK Gas Transportation Pipelines, L.L.C. (ONEOK) and interstate services through its interconnect with pipelines operated by Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. (Southern Star).

Salt Plains is in a strategic mid-continent location with interconnects to pipelines owned by Southern Star and ONEOK, which serve both regional and mid-continent gas markets. This provides customers the benefits of liquidity, supply, and arbitrage opportunities. Compression is gas-powered and approximately 10,000 horsepower. The reservoir has a total capacity of approximately 13.0 Bcf. Salt Plains operates 30 wells that are completed in a depleted natural gas storage reservoir characterized by rock. The wells are connected to a central plant facility by seven miles of pipeline.

NGPL Contracted Capacity

In addition to the facilities it owns and operates, the company also contracts for 8.5 Bcf of gas storage capacity on a long-term basis from Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC (NGPL) on the MidCon leg and the TexOk leg of its pipeline system in the mid-continent. The NGPL system connects and balances Gulf Coast and mid-continent supply basins with Chicago and other Midwestern U.S. end-use markets. NGPL has different storage facilities on its pipeline system and manages its storage capacity as pools on separate legs of the pipeline.

Access Gas Services

The company has gas marketing business in eastern Canada and British Columbia serving commercial, industrial, and retail customers. In eastern Canada, EnerStream Agency Services Inc. also provides fee based agency services to natural gas end-users.


The company’s gas storage customers include a mix of gas market participants, including financial institutions, producers, marketers, power generators, pipelines, utilities, and municipalities.


The company’s competitors for its AECO Hub facility include TransCanada (Edson, CrossAlta), Atco (Carbon), and Enstor (Alberta Hub). Competitors of its Wild Goose facility include Buckeye Partners (Lodi) and PG&E. Competitors of its Salt Plains facility include Southern Star.


Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC was founded in 2006.

The above Company Fundamental Report is a half-ready report and contents are subject to change.
It means that we have all necessary data in our database to prepare the report but need 2-3 days to complete it. During this time we are also updating the report with respect to the current moment. So, you can get all the most recent data available for the same price. Please note that preparation of additional types of analyses requires extra time.




1.1. Key facts
1.2. Financial Performance
1.3. Key Executives
1.4. Ownership and Major Holders
1.5. Company History


2.1. Business Description
2.2. Major Products and Services
2.3. Markets and Sales Activities
2.4. Locations, Subsidiaries, Operating Units


3.1. Overview
3.2. Strengths
3.3. Weaknesses
3.4. Opportunities
3.5. Threats


4.1. Financial Statements
  4.1.1. Income Statement
  4.1.2. Balance Sheet
  4.1.3. Cash Flow
4.2. Financial Ratios
  4.2.1. Profitability
  4.2.2. Margin Analysis
  4.2.3. Asset Turnover
  4.2.4. Credit Ratios
  4.2.5. Long-Term Solvency
  4.2.6. Growth Over Prior Year
  4.2.7. Financial Ratios Charts
4.3. Stock Market Snapshot


5.1. Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Direct Competitors
5.2. Comparison of Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC and Direct Competitors Financial Ratios
5.3. Comparison of Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC and Direct Competitors Stock Charts
5.4. Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Industry Analysis
  5.4.1. Energy Industry Snapshot
  5.4.2. Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Industry Position Analysis


6.1. News & PR Activity Analysis
6.2. IR Corporate News
6.3. Marketing News
6.4. Corporate Events


7.1. Experts Opinion
7.2. Experts Estimates



9.1. Political Factors
9.2. Economic Factors
9.3. Social Factors
9.4. Technological Factors
9.5. Environmental Factors
9.6. Legal Factors


10.1. Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.2. External Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.3. Internal External Matrix





Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Key Facts
Management Effectiveness
Income Statement Key Figures
Balance Sheet Key Figures
Cash Flow Statement Key Figures
Financial Performance Abbreviation Guide
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Key Executives
Key Executives Biographies1
Key Executives Compensations1
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Major Shareholders
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC History
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Products
Revenues by Segment
Revenues by Region
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Offices and Representations
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC SWOT Analysis
Yearly Income Statement Including Trends
Income Statement Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Balance Sheet Including Trends
Balance Sheet Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Cash Flow Including Trends
Cash Flow Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Profitability Ratios
Margin Analysis Ratios
Asset Turnover Ratios
Credit Ratios
Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Financial Ratios Growth Over Prior Year
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Capital Market Snapshot
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Direct Competitors Key Facts
Direct Competitors Profitability Ratios
Direct Competitors Margin Analysis Ratios
Direct Competitors Asset Turnover Ratios
Direct Competitors Credit Ratios
Direct Competitors Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Energy Industry Statistics
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Industry Position
Company vs. Industry Income Statement Analysis
Company vs. Industry Balance Sheet Analysis
Company vs. Industry Cash Flow Analysis
Company vs. Industry Ratios Comparison
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Consensus Recommendations1
Analyst Recommendation Summary1
Price Target Summary1
Experts Recommendation Trends1
Revenue Estimates Analysis1
Earnings Estimates Analysis1
Historical Surprises1
Revenue Estimates Trend1
Earnings Estimates Trend1
Revenue Revisions1


Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Annual Revenues in Comparison with Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit
Profit Margin Chart
Operating Margin Chart
Return on Equity (ROE) Chart
Return on Assets (ROA) Chart
Debt to Equity Chart
Current Ratio Chart
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC 1-year Stock Charts
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC 5-year Stock Charts
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC vs. Main Indexes 1-year Stock Chart
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC vs. Direct Competitors 1-year Stock Charts
Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Article Density Chart

1 – Data availability depends on company’s security policy.
2 – These sections are available only when you purchase a report with appropriate additional types of analyses.
The complete financial data is available for publicly traded companies.

Enhanced SWOT Analysis

Enhanced SWOT is a 3×3 grid that arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats into one scheme:

  • How to use the strengths to take advantage of the opportunities?
  • How to use the strengths to reduce likelihood and impact of the threats?
  • How to overcome the weaknesses that obstruct taking advantage of the opportunities?
  • How to overcome the weaknesses that can make the threats a reality?

Upon answering these questions a company can develop a project plan to improve its business performance.

PESTEL Analysis

PESTEL (also termed as PESTLE) is an ideal tool to strategically analyze what influence different outside factors – political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental and legal – exert on a business to later chart its long term targets.

Being part of the external analysis when carrying out a strategic assessment or performing a market study, PESTEL gives an overview of diverse macro-environmental factors that any company should thoughtfully consider. By perceiving these outside environments, businesses can maximally benefit from the opportunities while minimizing the threats to the organization.

Key Factors Examined by PESTEL Analysis:

  • Political – What opportunities and pressures are brought by political bodies and what is the degree of public regulations’ impact on the business?
  • Economic – What economic policies, trends and structures are expected to affect the organization, what is this influence’s degree?
  • Sociological – What cultural and societal aspects will work upon the demand for the business’s products and operations?
  • Technological – What impact do the technological aspects, innovations, incentives and barriers have on the organization?
  • Environmental – What environmental and ecological facets, both locally and farther afield, are likely to predetermine the business?
  • Legal – What laws and legislation will exert influence on the style the business is carried out?

IFE, EFE, IE Matrices

The Internal Factor Evaluation matrix (IFE matrix) is a strategic management tool helping audit or evaluate major weaknesses and strengths in a business’s functional areas. In addition, IFE matrix serves as a basis for identifying and assessing relationships amongst those areas. The IFE matrix is utilised in strategy formulation.

The External Factor Evaluation matrix (EFE matrix) is a tool of strategic management that is typically utilised to assess current market conditions. It is an ideal instrument for visualising and prioritising the threats and opportunities a firm is facing.

The essential difference between the above mentioned matrices lies in the type of factors incorporated in the model; whilst the latter is engaged in internal factors, the former deals exceptionally with external factors – those exposed to social, political, economic, legal, etc. external forces.

Being a continuation of the EFE matrix and IFE matrix models, the Internal External matrix (IE matrix) rests upon an investigation of external and internal business factors integrated into one suggestive model.

Porter Five Forces Analysis

The Porter’s five forces analysis studies the industry of operation and helps the company find new sources of competitive advantage. The analysis surveys an industry through five major questions:

  1. What composes a threat of substitute products and services?
  2. Is there a threat of new competitors entering the market?
  3. What is the intensity of competitive rivalry?
  4. How big is the bargaining power of buyers?
  5. How significant is the bargaining power of suppliers?

VRIO Analysis

VRIO stands for Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization. This analysis helps to evaluate all company’s resources and capabilities and bring them together into one aggregate table that includes:

  • Tangible resources
    • Financial
    • Physical
    • Technological
    • Organizational
  • Intangible resources
    • Human
    • Innovation and Creativity
    • Reputation
  • Organizational capabilities

The result of the analysis gives a clear picture of company’s competitive and economic implications, answering the questions if the resources mentioned above are:

  • Valuable?
  • Rare?
  • Costly to imitate?
  • Organized properly?
Skip to top

Ask Your Question

Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC Fundamental Company Report Including Financial, SWOT, Competitors and Industry Analysis
Company name*:
Contact person*:
Request invoice
Your enquiry:
Please click on a Check Box below to confirm you are not a robot: