EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET FORECAST 2017-2026
KEY FINDINGS
Waste to Energy Market (WTE) in Europe is expected to witness an upsurge in its 2016 revenue of $14155.7 million by rising at a CAGR of 6.90%. By the end of the forecast period of 2017-2026, the market is predicted to raise nearly $27513.1 million.
MARKET INSIGHTS
The WTE market is primarily segmented on the basis of three technologies: biological, thermal and physical WTE. The European market is probably the most advanced market for waste to energy technology. The European Commission has framed various directives for waste management in the region which follows a waste hierarchy and sets multiple levels to implement waste management techniques. The European market captured almost 50% of the global WTE revenue share in the year 2016.
COMPETITIVE INSIGHTS
Amec Foster Wheeler (Acquire By Wood Group), Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Wheelabrator, Waste Management Inc, Veolia Environment, Green Conversion Systems, Keppel Seghers, Suez Environment, Xcel Energy, Covanta Technologies, Plasco Conversion Technologies (Acquired By Rmb Advisory Services), and C&G Environmental Protection Holdings Ltd are few of the established companies in this region.
Waste to Energy Market (WTE) in Europe is expected to witness an upsurge in its 2016 revenue of $14155.7 million by rising at a CAGR of 6.90%. By the end of the forecast period of 2017-2026, the market is predicted to raise nearly $27513.1 million.
MARKET INSIGHTS
The WTE market is primarily segmented on the basis of three technologies: biological, thermal and physical WTE. The European market is probably the most advanced market for waste to energy technology. The European Commission has framed various directives for waste management in the region which follows a waste hierarchy and sets multiple levels to implement waste management techniques. The European market captured almost 50% of the global WTE revenue share in the year 2016.
COMPETITIVE INSIGHTS
Amec Foster Wheeler (Acquire By Wood Group), Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Wheelabrator, Waste Management Inc, Veolia Environment, Green Conversion Systems, Keppel Seghers, Suez Environment, Xcel Energy, Covanta Technologies, Plasco Conversion Technologies (Acquired By Rmb Advisory Services), and C&G Environmental Protection Holdings Ltd are few of the established companies in this region.
1. RESEARCH SCOPE
1.1. STUDY GOALS
1.2. SCOPE OF THE MARKET STUDY
1.3. WHO WILL FIND THIS REPORT USEFUL?
1.4. STUDY AND FORECASTING YEARS
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1. SOURCES OF DATA
2.1.1. SECONDARY DATA
2.1.2. PRIMARY DATA
2.2. TOP-DOWN APPROACH
2.3. BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
2.4. DATA TRIANGULATION
3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3.1. MARKET SUMMARY
3.2. KEY FINDINGS
3.2.1. EUROPE ACCOUNTS FOR THE LARGEST REVENUE SHARE OF THE OVERALL WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET
3.2.2. BIOLOGICAL WTE TECHNOLOGY IS ANTICIPATED TO BE THE FASTEST EVOLVING TECHNOLOGY IN THE MARKET
3.2.3. INCINERATION IS A DOMINANT THERMAL WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
4. WASTE-TO-ENERGY OUTLOOK
4.1. INTRODUCTION
4.2. SOURCES OF WASTE
4.3. WASTE-TO-ENERGY: THE CONCEPT
4.4. BENEFITS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY
4.5. CHALLENGES TO WASTE-TO-ENERGY
4.6. WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
4.6.1. THERMAL
4.6.1.1. INCINERATION
4.6.1.2. GASIFICATION
4.6.1.3. PYROLYSIS
4.6.1.4. PLASMA-ARC WTE TECHNOLOGY
4.6.2. BIOLOGICAL
4.6.2.1. ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
4.6.2.2. BIOGAS TO ENERGY
4.6.3. PHYSICAL
4.7. WASTE-TO-ENERGY STRATEGY ANALYSIS
4.8. APPLICATIONS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY
4.8.1. ELECTRICITY
4.8.2. HEAT
4.8.3. COMBINED HEAT AND POWER (CHP)
4.8.4. TRANSPORT FUELS
5. MARKET DYNAMICS
5.1. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
5.2. MARKET DRIVERS
5.2.1. DEPLETION OF CONVENTIONAL ENERGY RESOURCES AUGMENTING DEMAND OF RENEWABLE ENERGY
5.2.2. GROWING ENERGY DEMAND
5.2.3. INCREASING MUNICIPAL WASTE GENERATION.
5.2.4. DECLINE IN THE NUMBER OF LANDFILL SITES
5.3. MARKET RESTRAINTS
5.3.1. HIGH INITIAL SETUP COST
5.3.2. OPPOSITION FROM LOCAL COMMUNITIES & ENVIRONMENT GROUPS
5.3.3. STRINGENT ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES
5.4. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
5.4.1. HYDROTHERMAL CARBONISATION (HTC) & DENDRO LIQUID ENERGY (DLE) - KEY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
5.5. MARKET CHALLENGES
5.5.1. LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND SKILLED WORKFORCE
5.5.2. THREAT FROM ESTABLISHED COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGIES SUCH AS SOLAR POWER, HYDROPOWER AND WIND POWER
5.5.3. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMICAL OBSTACLES
6. MARKET SEGMENTATION - BY TECHNOLOGY
6.1. THERMAL
6.2. BIOLOGICAL
6.3. PHYSICAL
7. LEGAL, POLICY & REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS REGARDING EUROPEAN WASTE MANAGEMENT
7.1. CURRENT PRACTICES
7.2. WASTE LEGISLATION AND POLICIES
7.3. ROLE OF BIOGAS FEED-IN TARIFFS AND RELATED POLICIES
7.4. WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
8. KEY ANALYTICS
8.1. PORTER’S FIVE FORCE ANALYSIS
8.1.1. THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
8.1.2. THREAT OF SUBSTITUTE
8.1.3. BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
8.1.4. BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
8.1.5. INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
8.2. OPPORTUNITY MATRIX
8.3. KEY BUYING CRITERIA
8.3.1. PRICE
8.3.2. PRODUCT AVAILABILITY
8.3.3. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
8.3.4. ALTERNATIVES
8.4. VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
8.4.1. WASTE PRODUCERS
8.4.2. WASTE COLLECTION
8.4.3. SUPPLIERS
8.4.4. MANUFACTURERS
8.4.5. DISTRIBUTORS
8.4.6. RETAILERS
8.4.7. END-USERS
9. GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
9.1. GERMANY
9.2. UNITED KINGDOM
9.3. SPAIN
9.4. ITALY
9.5. FRANCE
9.6. REST OF EUROPE
10. COMPANY PROFILES
10.1. AMEC FOSTER WHEELER (ACQUIRE BY WOOD GROUP)
10.2. BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES
10.3. C&G ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HOLDINGS LTD.
10.4. CHINA EVERBRIGHT INTERNATIONAL,
10.5. COVANTA TECHNOLOGIES,
10.6. GREEN CONVERSION SYSTEMS,
10.7. HITACHI ZOSEN,
10.8. KEPPEL SEGHERS
10.9. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES,
10.10. PLASCO CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES (ACQUIRED BY RMB ADVISORY SERVICES)
10.11. SUEZ ENVIRONMENT
10.12. VEOLIA ENVIRONMENT
10.13. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC
10.14. WHEELABRATOR
10.15. XCEL ENERGY
1.1. STUDY GOALS
1.2. SCOPE OF THE MARKET STUDY
1.3. WHO WILL FIND THIS REPORT USEFUL?
1.4. STUDY AND FORECASTING YEARS
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1. SOURCES OF DATA
2.1.1. SECONDARY DATA
2.1.2. PRIMARY DATA
2.2. TOP-DOWN APPROACH
2.3. BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
2.4. DATA TRIANGULATION
3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3.1. MARKET SUMMARY
3.2. KEY FINDINGS
3.2.1. EUROPE ACCOUNTS FOR THE LARGEST REVENUE SHARE OF THE OVERALL WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET
3.2.2. BIOLOGICAL WTE TECHNOLOGY IS ANTICIPATED TO BE THE FASTEST EVOLVING TECHNOLOGY IN THE MARKET
3.2.3. INCINERATION IS A DOMINANT THERMAL WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
4. WASTE-TO-ENERGY OUTLOOK
4.1. INTRODUCTION
4.2. SOURCES OF WASTE
4.3. WASTE-TO-ENERGY: THE CONCEPT
4.4. BENEFITS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY
4.5. CHALLENGES TO WASTE-TO-ENERGY
4.6. WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
4.6.1. THERMAL
4.6.1.1. INCINERATION
4.6.1.2. GASIFICATION
4.6.1.3. PYROLYSIS
4.6.1.4. PLASMA-ARC WTE TECHNOLOGY
4.6.2. BIOLOGICAL
4.6.2.1. ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
4.6.2.2. BIOGAS TO ENERGY
4.6.3. PHYSICAL
4.7. WASTE-TO-ENERGY STRATEGY ANALYSIS
4.8. APPLICATIONS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY
4.8.1. ELECTRICITY
4.8.2. HEAT
4.8.3. COMBINED HEAT AND POWER (CHP)
4.8.4. TRANSPORT FUELS
5. MARKET DYNAMICS
5.1. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE
5.2. MARKET DRIVERS
5.2.1. DEPLETION OF CONVENTIONAL ENERGY RESOURCES AUGMENTING DEMAND OF RENEWABLE ENERGY
5.2.2. GROWING ENERGY DEMAND
5.2.3. INCREASING MUNICIPAL WASTE GENERATION.
5.2.4. DECLINE IN THE NUMBER OF LANDFILL SITES
5.3. MARKET RESTRAINTS
5.3.1. HIGH INITIAL SETUP COST
5.3.2. OPPOSITION FROM LOCAL COMMUNITIES & ENVIRONMENT GROUPS
5.3.3. STRINGENT ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES
5.4. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
5.4.1. HYDROTHERMAL CARBONISATION (HTC) & DENDRO LIQUID ENERGY (DLE) - KEY EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
5.5. MARKET CHALLENGES
5.5.1. LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND SKILLED WORKFORCE
5.5.2. THREAT FROM ESTABLISHED COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGIES SUCH AS SOLAR POWER, HYDROPOWER AND WIND POWER
5.5.3. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMICAL OBSTACLES
6. MARKET SEGMENTATION - BY TECHNOLOGY
6.1. THERMAL
6.2. BIOLOGICAL
6.3. PHYSICAL
7. LEGAL, POLICY & REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS REGARDING EUROPEAN WASTE MANAGEMENT
7.1. CURRENT PRACTICES
7.2. WASTE LEGISLATION AND POLICIES
7.3. ROLE OF BIOGAS FEED-IN TARIFFS AND RELATED POLICIES
7.4. WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
8. KEY ANALYTICS
8.1. PORTER’S FIVE FORCE ANALYSIS
8.1.1. THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
8.1.2. THREAT OF SUBSTITUTE
8.1.3. BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
8.1.4. BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
8.1.5. INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
8.2. OPPORTUNITY MATRIX
8.3. KEY BUYING CRITERIA
8.3.1. PRICE
8.3.2. PRODUCT AVAILABILITY
8.3.3. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
8.3.4. ALTERNATIVES
8.4. VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
8.4.1. WASTE PRODUCERS
8.4.2. WASTE COLLECTION
8.4.3. SUPPLIERS
8.4.4. MANUFACTURERS
8.4.5. DISTRIBUTORS
8.4.6. RETAILERS
8.4.7. END-USERS
9. GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS
9.1. GERMANY
9.2. UNITED KINGDOM
9.3. SPAIN
9.4. ITALY
9.5. FRANCE
9.6. REST OF EUROPE
10. COMPANY PROFILES
10.1. AMEC FOSTER WHEELER (ACQUIRE BY WOOD GROUP)
10.2. BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES
10.3. C&G ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HOLDINGS LTD.
10.4. CHINA EVERBRIGHT INTERNATIONAL,
10.5. COVANTA TECHNOLOGIES,
10.6. GREEN CONVERSION SYSTEMS,
10.7. HITACHI ZOSEN,
10.8. KEPPEL SEGHERS
10.9. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES,
10.10. PLASCO CONVERSION TECHNOLOGIES (ACQUIRED BY RMB ADVISORY SERVICES)
10.11. SUEZ ENVIRONMENT
10.12. VEOLIA ENVIRONMENT
10.13. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC
10.14. WHEELABRATOR
10.15. XCEL ENERGY
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Table 2: TYPES OR SOURCES OF WASTE
Table 3: KEY BENEFITS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY PROCESSES
Table 4: KEY CHALLENGES TO WTE MARKETS
Table 5: KEY THERMAL WTE SUPPLIERS BY TYPE OF INCINERATION
Table 6: KEY ALTERNATIVE THERMAL WTE TECHNOLOGY PROVIDERS WITH NUMBER OF PLANTS, THROUGHPUT AND TECHNOLOGY CONFIGURATION
Table 7: COMPARISON BETWEEN COMBUSTION, GASIFICATION, AND PYROLYSIS
Table 8: COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES WITH ALTERNATIVE WTE TECHNOLOGIES
Table 9: LIST OF METHODS UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR IMPROVING BIOGAS YIELDS
Table 10: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ANAEROBIC AND AEROBIC DIGESTION
Table 11: LIST OF POTENTIAL MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES
Table 12: IMPORTANT PARAMETERS FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Table 13: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MESOPHILIC AND THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Table 14: BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF DIFFERENT ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS CONFIGURATIONS
Table 15: COMPARISON OF GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF VARIOUS POWER GENERATORS
Table 16: DIFFERENT FUEL CELL TYPES USED FOR BIOGAS CONVERSION
Table 17: PROJECTED WASTE GENERATION DATA FOR 2025, BY REGION
Table 18: CARBON EFFICIENCY OF SEVERAL BIOFUEL PRODUCTION PROCESSES
Table 19: COMPETING RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES
Table 20: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Table 21: KEY LEGISLATION AND POLICIES FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EUROPE
Table 22: COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL INCENTIVE POLICIES ADOPTED BY VARIOUS EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
Table 23: OPPORTUNITY MATRIX OF WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET
Table 24: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Table 25: LEVELS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EUROPE
Table 1: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Table 2: TYPES OR SOURCES OF WASTE
Table 3: KEY BENEFITS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY PROCESSES
Table 4: KEY CHALLENGES TO WTE MARKETS
Table 5: KEY THERMAL WTE SUPPLIERS BY TYPE OF INCINERATION
Table 6: KEY ALTERNATIVE THERMAL WTE TECHNOLOGY PROVIDERS WITH NUMBER OF PLANTS, THROUGHPUT AND TECHNOLOGY CONFIGURATION
Table 7: COMPARISON BETWEEN COMBUSTION, GASIFICATION, AND PYROLYSIS
Table 8: COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES WITH ALTERNATIVE WTE TECHNOLOGIES
Table 9: LIST OF METHODS UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR IMPROVING BIOGAS YIELDS
Table 10: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ANAEROBIC AND AEROBIC DIGESTION
Table 11: LIST OF POTENTIAL MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES
Table 12: IMPORTANT PARAMETERS FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Table 13: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MESOPHILIC AND THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
Table 14: BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF DIFFERENT ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS CONFIGURATIONS
Table 15: COMPARISON OF GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF VARIOUS POWER GENERATORS
Table 16: DIFFERENT FUEL CELL TYPES USED FOR BIOGAS CONVERSION
Table 17: PROJECTED WASTE GENERATION DATA FOR 2025, BY REGION
Table 18: CARBON EFFICIENCY OF SEVERAL BIOFUEL PRODUCTION PROCESSES
Table 19: COMPETING RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES
Table 20: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Table 21: KEY LEGISLATION AND POLICIES FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EUROPE
Table 22: COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL INCENTIVE POLICIES ADOPTED BY VARIOUS EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
Table 23: OPPORTUNITY MATRIX OF WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET
Table 24: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Table 25: LEVELS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN EUROPE
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2016 & 2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 2: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 3: REVENUE GENERATED BY BIOLOGICAL WASTE TO ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 4: MARKET INVESTMENT FOR INCINERATION IN ASIA PACIFIC, EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA
Figure 5: COMPOSITION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW)
Figure 6: BASIC PATHWAYS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY
Figure 7: THERMAL WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY TYPES
Figure 8: WORLDWIDE RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY INSTALLED CAPACITY, BY SOURCE, 2012–2019 (GW)
Figure 9: WORLDWIDE GDP GROWTH RATE AND TRENDS BY ECONOMY (ACTUAL AND PROJECTED), 2010–2025 (IN %)
Figure 10: WORLDWIDE REGION-WISE ENERGY CONSUMPTION, 2015–2035 (MTOE = MILLION TONS OF OIL EQUIVALENT)
Figure 11: WORLDWIDE AVAILABLE MUNICIPAL WASTE FOR WTE, 2009–2016 (MILLION TONS)
Figure 12: LANDFILLING TREND IN EUROPE: MSW GENERATED VS. MSW LANDFILLED, 2013–2016 (MILLION METRIC TONS)
Figure 13: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY THERMAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 14: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 15: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY PHYSICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 16: PORTER’S FIVE FORCE MODEL OF WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET
Figure 17: KEY BUYING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Figure 18: VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY MARKET
Figure 19: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, REGIONAL OUTLOOK, 2016 & 2026 (IN %)
Figure 20: GERMANY WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 21: UNITED KINGDOM WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 22: NUMBER OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY FACILITIES IN UNITED KINGDOM, 2014-2016
Figure 23: SPAIN WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 24: ITALY WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 25: FRANCE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 26: REST OF EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 1: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY TECHNOLOGY, 2016 & 2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 2: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 3: REVENUE GENERATED BY BIOLOGICAL WASTE TO ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 4: MARKET INVESTMENT FOR INCINERATION IN ASIA PACIFIC, EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA
Figure 5: COMPOSITION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE (MSW)
Figure 6: BASIC PATHWAYS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY
Figure 7: THERMAL WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGY TYPES
Figure 8: WORLDWIDE RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY INSTALLED CAPACITY, BY SOURCE, 2012–2019 (GW)
Figure 9: WORLDWIDE GDP GROWTH RATE AND TRENDS BY ECONOMY (ACTUAL AND PROJECTED), 2010–2025 (IN %)
Figure 10: WORLDWIDE REGION-WISE ENERGY CONSUMPTION, 2015–2035 (MTOE = MILLION TONS OF OIL EQUIVALENT)
Figure 11: WORLDWIDE AVAILABLE MUNICIPAL WASTE FOR WTE, 2009–2016 (MILLION TONS)
Figure 12: LANDFILLING TREND IN EUROPE: MSW GENERATED VS. MSW LANDFILLED, 2013–2016 (MILLION METRIC TONS)
Figure 13: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY THERMAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 14: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 15: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, BY PHYSICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 16: PORTER’S FIVE FORCE MODEL OF WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET
Figure 17: KEY BUYING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Figure 18: VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY MARKET
Figure 19: EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, REGIONAL OUTLOOK, 2016 & 2026 (IN %)
Figure 20: GERMANY WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 21: UNITED KINGDOM WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 22: NUMBER OF WASTE-TO-ENERGY FACILITIES IN UNITED KINGDOM, 2014-2016
Figure 23: SPAIN WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 24: ITALY WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 25: FRANCE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
Figure 26: REST OF EUROPE WASTE TO ENERGY MARKET, 2017-2026 (IN $ MILLION)
