- The report contains detailed information about Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP that gives an unrivalled in-depth knowledge about internal business-environment of the company: data about the owners, senior executives, locations, subsidiaries, markets, products, and company history.
- Another part of the report is a SWOT-analysis carried out for Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP. It involves specifying the objective of the company's business and identifies the different factors that are favorable and unfavorable to achieving that objective. SWOT-analysis helps to understand company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and possible threats against it.
- The Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP financial analysis covers the income statement and ratio trend-charts with balance sheets and cash flows presented on an annual and quarterly basis. The report outlines the main financial ratios pertaining to profitability, margin analysis, asset turnover, credit ratios, and company’s long-term solvency. This sort of company's information will assist and strengthen your company’s decision-making processes.
- In the part that describes Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP competitors and the industry in whole, the information about company's financial ratios is compared to those of its competitors and to the industry. The unique analysis of the market and company’s competitors along with detailed information about the internal and external factors affecting the relevant industry will help to manage your business environment. Your company’s business and sales activities will be boosted by gaining an insight into your competitors’ businesses.
- Also the report provides relevant news, an analysis of PR-activity, and stock price movements. The latter are correlated with pertinent news and press releases, and annual and quarterly forecasts are given by a variety of experts and market research firms. Such information creates your awareness about principal trends of Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP business.
About Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP
Atlas Pipeline Holdings, L.P., through its subsidiaries, provides natural gas gathering services in the Anadarko and Permian Basins located in the southwestern and mid-continent United States and the Appalachian Basin in the eastern United States. In addition, the company is a provider of natural gas processing and treating services in Oklahoma and Texas.
The companys business is conducted in the midstream segment of the natural gas industry through two segments: Mid-Continent and Appalachia.
In its Mid-Continent operations, the company owns, has interests in, and operates eight natural gas processing plants with aggregate capacity of approximately 900 MMCFD (Million cubic feet per day) and one treating facility with a capacity of approximately 200 MMCFD. These facilities are connected to approximately 9,100 miles of active natural gas gathering systems located in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas, which gathers gas from wells and central delivery points to the companys natural gas processing and treating plants, as well as third-party pipelines.
The Appalachia operations of the company are conducted principally through its 49% ownership interest in the Laurel Mountain Midstream, LLC joint venture (Laurel Mountain), which owns and operates approximately 1,800 miles of natural gas gathering systems in the Appalachian Basin located in the northeastern United States. The company also owns and operates approximately 80 miles of active natural gas gathering pipelines located in northeastern Tennessee.
In May 2009, the company and subsidiaries of The Williams Companies, Inc. (Williams) formed Laurel Mountain, which owns and operates Appalachia natural gas gathering system (Legacy Appalachia), excluding its northeastern Tennessee operations. Laurel Mountain gathers the majority of the natural gas from wells operated by Atlas Energy Resources, LLC and its subsidiaries (Atlas Energy Resources), a wholly owned subsidiary of Atlas Energy.
The companys operations are all located in or near areas of natural gas production, including the Granite Wash formation; Golden Trend; Woodford Shale; Hugoton field in the Anadarko basin; the Spraberry Trend, which is an oil play with associated natural gas in the Permian Basin and the Marcellus Shale in the Appalachian Basin. The companys Mid-Continent gathering systems are connected to approximately 7,900 central delivery points or wells. In Appalachia, Laurel Mountains systems are connected to approximately 7,700 wells.
The company owns and operates approximately 9,100 miles of intrastate natural gas gathering systems located in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas. It also owns and operates eight processing plants and one stand-alone treating facility located in Oklahoma and Texas. The companys gathering, processing, and treating assets service long-lived natural gas regions, including the Permian and Anadarko Basins. The companys systems gather natural gas from oil and natural gas wells and process the raw natural gas into merchantable, or residue, gas by extracting NGLs and removing impurities. In the aggregate, APLs Mid-Continent systems have approximately 7,900 receipt points, consisting primarily of individual well connections and, secondarily, central delivery points which are linked to multiple wells. The companys gathering systems interconnect with interstate and intrastate pipelines operated by ANR Pipeline Company, CenterPoint Energy, Inc., El Paso Natural Gas Company, Enogex LLC, Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Northern Natural Gas Company, ONEOK Gas Transportation, LLC, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP and Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. APLs processing facilities are connected to NGL pipelines operated by ONEOK Hydrocarbon, L.P.
The companys Appalachia operations are principally conducted through its 49% interest in Laurel Mountain. Laurel Mountain owns and operates approximately 1,800 miles of intrastate gas gathering systems located in northeastern Appalachia, including assets in the Marcellus Shale. The company also owns and operates approximately 80 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines in northeastern Tennessee. Laurel Mountain serves approximately 7,700 wells. APLs Tennessee systems serve approximately 190 wells. The companys gathering systems provide a means through which well owners and operators can transport the natural gas produced by their wells to interstate and public utility pipelines for delivery to customers. The companys gathering systems transport natural gas directly to customers.
The company competes for the acquisition of well connections with several other gathering/processing operations. These operations include plants and gathering systems operated by ONEOK Field Services, Carrera Gas Company, Copano Energy, LLC, Enogex, LLC, Eagle Rock Midstream Resources, L.P., Enbridge, Inc., Hiland Partners, Penn-Virginia Resources, MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P., Mustang Fuel Corporation, DCP Midstream, West Texas Gas, BP Amoco, Southern Union Company and Targa Resources.
The above Company Fundamental Report is a half-ready report and contents are subject to change.
It means that we have all necessary data in our database to prepare the report but need 2-3 days to complete it. During this time we are also updating the report with respect to the current moment. So, you can get all the most recent data available for the same price. Please note that preparation of additional types of analyses requires extra time.
1. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP COMPANY PROFILE
1.1. Key facts
1.2. Financial Performance
1.3. Key Executives
1.4. Ownership and Major Holders
1.5. Company History
2. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP BUSINESS OVERVIEW
2.1. Business Description
2.2. Major Products and Services
2.3. Markets and Sales Activities
2.4. Locations, Subsidiaries, Operating Units
3. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP SWOT ANALYSIS
4. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
4.1. Financial Statements
4.1.1. Income Statement
4.1.2. Balance Sheet
4.1.3. Cash Flow
4.2. Financial Ratios
4.2.2. Margin Analysis
4.2.3. Asset Turnover
4.2.4. Credit Ratios
4.2.5. Long-Term Solvency
4.2.6. Growth Over Prior Year
4.2.7. Financial Ratios Charts
4.3. Stock Market Snapshot
5. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP COMPETITORS AND INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
5.1. Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Direct Competitors
5.2. Comparison of Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP and Direct Competitors Financial Ratios
5.3. Comparison of Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP and Direct Competitors Stock Charts
5.4. Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Industry Analysis
5.4.1. Energy Industry Snapshot
5.4.2. Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Industry Position Analysis
6. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP NEWS & EVENTS
6.1. News & PR Activity Analysis
6.2. IR Corporate News
6.3. Marketing News
6.4. Corporate Events
7. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP EXPERTS REVIEW1
7.1. Experts Opinion
7.2. Experts Estimates
8. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP ENHANCED SWOT ANALYSIS2
9. UNITED STATES PESTEL ANALYSIS2
9.1. Political Factors
9.2. Economic Factors
9.3. Social Factors
9.4. Technological Factors
9.5. Environmental Factors
9.6. Legal Factors
10. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP IFE, EFE, IE MATRICES2
10.1. Internal Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.2. External Factor Evaluation Matrix
10.3. Internal External Matrix
11. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP PORTER FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS2
12. ATLAS PIPELINE HOLDINGS LP VRIO ANALYSIS2
APPENDIX: RATIO DEFINITIONS
LIST OF TABLES
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Key Facts
Income Statement Key Figures
Balance Sheet Key Figures
Cash Flow Statement Key Figures
Financial Performance Abbreviation Guide
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Key Executives
Key Executives Biographies1
Key Executives Compensations1
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Major Shareholders
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP History
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Products
Revenues by Segment
Revenues by Region
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Offices and Representations
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP SWOT Analysis
Yearly Income Statement Including Trends
Income Statement Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Balance Sheet Including Trends
Balance Sheet Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Yearly Cash Flow Including Trends
Cash Flow Latest 4 Quarters Including Trends
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Profitability Ratios
Margin Analysis Ratios
Asset Turnover Ratios
Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Financial Ratios Growth Over Prior Year
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Capital Market Snapshot
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Direct Competitors Key Facts
Direct Competitors Profitability Ratios
Direct Competitors Margin Analysis Ratios
Direct Competitors Asset Turnover Ratios
Direct Competitors Credit Ratios
Direct Competitors Long-Term Solvency Ratios
Energy Industry Statistics
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Industry Position
Company vs. Industry Income Statement Analysis
Company vs. Industry Balance Sheet Analysis
Company vs. Industry Cash Flow Analysis
Company vs. Industry Ratios Comparison
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Consensus Recommendations1
Analyst Recommendation Summary1
Price Target Summary1
Experts Recommendation Trends1
Revenue Estimates Analysis1
Earnings Estimates Analysis1
Revenue Estimates Trend1
Earnings Estimates Trend1
LIST OF FIGURES
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Annual Revenues in Comparison with Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit
Profit Margin Chart
Operating Margin Chart
Return on Equity (ROE) Chart
Return on Assets (ROA) Chart
Debt to Equity Chart
Current Ratio Chart
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP 1-year Stock Charts
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP 5-year Stock Charts
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP vs. Main Indexes 1-year Stock Chart
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP vs. Direct Competitors 1-year Stock Charts
Atlas Pipeline Holdings LP Article Density Chart
1 – Data availability depends on company’s security policy.
2 – These sections are available only when you purchase a report with appropriate additional types of analyses.
The complete financial data is available for publicly traded companies.
Enhanced SWOT Analysis
Enhanced SWOT is a 3×3 grid that arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats into one scheme:
- How to use the strengths to take advantage of the opportunities?
- How to use the strengths to reduce likelihood and impact of the threats?
- How to overcome the weaknesses that obstruct taking advantage of the opportunities?
- How to overcome the weaknesses that can make the threats a reality?
Upon answering these questions a company can develop a project plan to improve its business performance.
PESTEL (also termed as PESTLE) is an ideal tool to strategically analyze what influence different outside factors – political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental and legal – exert on a business to later chart its long term targets.
Being part of the external analysis when carrying out a strategic assessment or performing a market study, PESTEL gives an overview of diverse macro-environmental factors that any company should thoughtfully consider. By perceiving these outside environments, businesses can maximally benefit from the opportunities while minimizing the threats to the organization.
Key Factors Examined by PESTEL Analysis:
- Political – What opportunities and pressures are brought by political bodies and what is the degree of public regulations’ impact on the business?
- Economic – What economic policies, trends and structures are expected to affect the organization, what is this influence’s degree?
- Sociological – What cultural and societal aspects will work upon the demand for the business’s products and operations?
- Technological – What impact do the technological aspects, innovations, incentives and barriers have on the organization?
- Environmental – What environmental and ecological facets, both locally and farther afield, are likely to predetermine the business?
- Legal – What laws and legislation will exert influence on the style the business is carried out?
IFE, EFE, IE Matrices
The Internal Factor Evaluation matrix (IFE matrix) is a strategic management tool helping audit or evaluate major weaknesses and strengths in a business’s functional areas. In addition, IFE matrix serves as a basis for identifying and assessing relationships amongst those areas. The IFE matrix is utilised in strategy formulation.
The External Factor Evaluation matrix (EFE matrix) is a tool of strategic management that is typically utilised to assess current market conditions. It is an ideal instrument for visualising and prioritising the threats and opportunities a firm is facing.
The essential difference between the above mentioned matrices lies in the type of factors incorporated in the model; whilst the latter is engaged in internal factors, the former deals exceptionally with external factors – those exposed to social, political, economic, legal, etc. external forces.
Being a continuation of the EFE matrix and IFE matrix models, the Internal External matrix (IE matrix) rests upon an investigation of external and internal business factors integrated into one suggestive model.
Porter Five Forces Analysis
The Porter’s five forces analysis studies the industry of operation and helps the company find new sources of competitive advantage. The analysis surveys an industry through five major questions:
- What composes a threat of substitute products and services?
- Is there a threat of new competitors entering the market?
- What is the intensity of competitive rivalry?
- How big is the bargaining power of buyers?
- How significant is the bargaining power of suppliers?
VRIO stands for Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization. This analysis helps to evaluate all company’s resources and capabilities and bring them together into one aggregate table that includes:
- Tangible resources
- Intangible resources
- Innovation and Creativity
- Organizational capabilities
The result of the analysis gives a clear picture of company’s competitive and economic implications, answering the questions if the resources mentioned above are:
- Costly to imitate?
- Organized properly?