FRP Rebar Market by Fiber Type (Carbon Fiber, Glass Fiber, Basalt Fiber), Resin Type (Vinyl Ester, Epoxy, Other Resin Types), Diameter (< 10 mm, 10–20 mm, > 20 mm), Surface Treatment (Sand Coated, Ribbed, Others), Tensile Strength (Low strength (500 MPa), Medium Strength (500-1000 MPa), High Strength (> 1000 MPa)), Application (Highway, Bridges, & Buildings, Marine Structure & Waterfront, Water Treatment Plants, Other Applications), & Region - Global Forecast to 2030
The FRP rebar market is estimated at USD 0.69 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 1.19 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 11.5% from 2025 to 2030. The market for FRP rebar is fueled by the rising demand for corrosion-resistant, long-lasting materials in construction and infrastructure projects, especially in chemically aggressive, marine, and coastal environments. FRP rebar represents a better alternative to conventional steel reinforcement because it is non-corrosive, has a lightweight nature, and possesses high tensile strength, factors that extend the life of structures by far while lowering maintenance expenses. Its electromagnetic interference resistance and manipulability also increase its popularity in uses like bridges, tunnels, marine construction, and industrial facilities, where traditional steel reinforcement is vulnerable to rusting and deterioration.
“Epoxy resin segment is projected to be the fastest-growing resin type during the forecast period.”
Epoxy resin is expected to be the most rapidly growing type of resin in the FRP rebar market because of its superior mechanical properties, high adhesion, excellent chemical resistance, and durability in aggressive environments over the long term. In contrast to other resins, epoxy has low shrinkage upon curing and retains structural integrity at high-stress levels, which makes it suitable for infrastructure applications where reliability and long life are essential. Due to its compatibility with other types of fibers and its resistance to moisture, heat, and corrosive substances, it is among the preferred resin choices in marine, coastal, and chemical plant buildings where polyester resins will not withstand.
“The medium tensile strength segment is projected to register the second-highest growth rate during the forecast period.”
Medium tensile strength FRP rebar is expected to register the second-highest CAGR in the FRP rebar market because it has the best balance of performance and cost-effectiveness. This type of rebar provides adequate strength for many structural applications, such as residential and commercial buildings, where ultra-high tensile strength is not necessary. Its versatility renders it appropriate for varied construction requirements, especially in areas that emphasize infrastructure development and urbanization. Additionally, the relatively affordable cost of medium tensile strength FRP rebar renders it a suitable alternative to steel reinforcement, especially in projects where budget is an issue. The increasing popularity of the advantages of FRP materials, including corrosion resistance and long life, is increasingly driving the demand for this segment in the construction sector.
“The Middle East & Africa region is projected to register the second-highest growth rate in the FRP rebar market during the forecast period.”
The Middle East and Africa is anticipated to register the second-highest CAGR in the FRP rebar market during the forecast period because of increased urbanization, widespread infrastructure growth, and a growing need for long-lasting, corrosion-resistant construction materials. High-profile developments like the Burj Khalifa in the UAE and Saudi Arabia’s NEOM City have used FRP rebar to add strength and longevity to the structure, particularly in challenging desert and coastal climates where steel reinforcement is subject to corrosion. The fact that these landmark developments have used FRP reflects its benefits in terms of longevity, lowered maintenance, and compliance with sustainability objectives. While regional governments and developers continue to pour investments into sustainable and future-proof infrastructure, the uptake of FRP rebar continues to gain speed, emerging as a favored replacement for traditional reinforcement in the construction scene of the MEA.
This study has been validated through primary interviews with industry experts globally. The primary sources have been divided into the following three categories:
Prominent companies in this market include Dextra Group (Thailand), Pultron Composites (New Zealand), Pultrall Inc. (Canada), Schцck Bauteile GmbH (Germany), Sireg S.P.A. (Italy), Kodiak Fiberglass Rebar (US), Neuvokas Corporation (US), Rцchling Group (Germany), Armastek (Russia), TUF Bar (Canada), ARC Insulations & Insulator Ltd. (India), Jindal Advanced Materials (India), SKD Composites (India), Galen Composites (Russia), and ICSC (Saudi Arabia).
Research Coverage
This research report categorizes the FRP rebar market by fiber type (carbon fiber, glass fiber, and basalt fiber), resin type (vinyl ester, epoxy, and other resin types), diameter (< 10mm, 10–20 mm, and > 20 mm), surface treatment (sand coated, ribbed, and others), tensile strength (low strength (500 MPa), medium strength (500-1000 MPa), and high strength (> 1000 MPa)), application (highway, bridges, & buildings, marine structure & waterfront, water treatment plants, and other applications), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East & Africa, and Latin America). The scope of the report includes detailed information about the major factors influencing the growth of the FRP rebar market, such as drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities. A thorough examination of the key industry players has been conducted to provide insights into their business overview, solutions and services, key strategies, and recent developments in the FRP rebar market are all covered. This report includes a competitive analysis of upcoming startups in the FRP rebar market ecosystem.
Reasons to buy this report
The report will help market leaders/new entrants in this market with information on the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall FRP rebar market and the subsegments. This report will help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to better position their businesses and plan suitable go-to-market strategies. The report also helps stakeholders understand the pulse of the market and provides them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.
The report provides insights on the following pointers:
“Epoxy resin segment is projected to be the fastest-growing resin type during the forecast period.”
Epoxy resin is expected to be the most rapidly growing type of resin in the FRP rebar market because of its superior mechanical properties, high adhesion, excellent chemical resistance, and durability in aggressive environments over the long term. In contrast to other resins, epoxy has low shrinkage upon curing and retains structural integrity at high-stress levels, which makes it suitable for infrastructure applications where reliability and long life are essential. Due to its compatibility with other types of fibers and its resistance to moisture, heat, and corrosive substances, it is among the preferred resin choices in marine, coastal, and chemical plant buildings where polyester resins will not withstand.
“The medium tensile strength segment is projected to register the second-highest growth rate during the forecast period.”
Medium tensile strength FRP rebar is expected to register the second-highest CAGR in the FRP rebar market because it has the best balance of performance and cost-effectiveness. This type of rebar provides adequate strength for many structural applications, such as residential and commercial buildings, where ultra-high tensile strength is not necessary. Its versatility renders it appropriate for varied construction requirements, especially in areas that emphasize infrastructure development and urbanization. Additionally, the relatively affordable cost of medium tensile strength FRP rebar renders it a suitable alternative to steel reinforcement, especially in projects where budget is an issue. The increasing popularity of the advantages of FRP materials, including corrosion resistance and long life, is increasingly driving the demand for this segment in the construction sector.
“The Middle East & Africa region is projected to register the second-highest growth rate in the FRP rebar market during the forecast period.”
The Middle East and Africa is anticipated to register the second-highest CAGR in the FRP rebar market during the forecast period because of increased urbanization, widespread infrastructure growth, and a growing need for long-lasting, corrosion-resistant construction materials. High-profile developments like the Burj Khalifa in the UAE and Saudi Arabia’s NEOM City have used FRP rebar to add strength and longevity to the structure, particularly in challenging desert and coastal climates where steel reinforcement is subject to corrosion. The fact that these landmark developments have used FRP reflects its benefits in terms of longevity, lowered maintenance, and compliance with sustainability objectives. While regional governments and developers continue to pour investments into sustainable and future-proof infrastructure, the uptake of FRP rebar continues to gain speed, emerging as a favored replacement for traditional reinforcement in the construction scene of the MEA.
This study has been validated through primary interviews with industry experts globally. The primary sources have been divided into the following three categories:
- By Company Type: Tier 1 - 40%, Tier 2 - 33%, and Tier 3 - 27%
- By Designation: C-level - 50%, Director-level - 30%, and Managers - 20%
- By Region: North America - 15%, Europe - 50%, Asia Pacific - 20%, the Middle East & Africa - 10%, and Latin America - 5%
Prominent companies in this market include Dextra Group (Thailand), Pultron Composites (New Zealand), Pultrall Inc. (Canada), Schцck Bauteile GmbH (Germany), Sireg S.P.A. (Italy), Kodiak Fiberglass Rebar (US), Neuvokas Corporation (US), Rцchling Group (Germany), Armastek (Russia), TUF Bar (Canada), ARC Insulations & Insulator Ltd. (India), Jindal Advanced Materials (India), SKD Composites (India), Galen Composites (Russia), and ICSC (Saudi Arabia).
Research Coverage
This research report categorizes the FRP rebar market by fiber type (carbon fiber, glass fiber, and basalt fiber), resin type (vinyl ester, epoxy, and other resin types), diameter (< 10mm, 10–20 mm, and > 20 mm), surface treatment (sand coated, ribbed, and others), tensile strength (low strength (500 MPa), medium strength (500-1000 MPa), and high strength (> 1000 MPa)), application (highway, bridges, & buildings, marine structure & waterfront, water treatment plants, and other applications), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East & Africa, and Latin America). The scope of the report includes detailed information about the major factors influencing the growth of the FRP rebar market, such as drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities. A thorough examination of the key industry players has been conducted to provide insights into their business overview, solutions and services, key strategies, and recent developments in the FRP rebar market are all covered. This report includes a competitive analysis of upcoming startups in the FRP rebar market ecosystem.
Reasons to buy this report
The report will help market leaders/new entrants in this market with information on the closest approximations of the revenue numbers for the overall FRP rebar market and the subsegments. This report will help stakeholders understand the competitive landscape and gain more insights to better position their businesses and plan suitable go-to-market strategies. The report also helps stakeholders understand the pulse of the market and provides them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.
The report provides insights on the following pointers:
- Analysis of key drivers (increasing demand from the construction industry and government regulations on the usage of FRP rebar), restraints (availability of substitutes and high cost of FRP rebar), opportunities (growing investments in large civil engineering projects and increasing adoption in marine construction), and challenges (low adoption and acceptance of FRP rebar and inability to completely replace steel rebar) are influencing the growth of the FRP rebar market.
- Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, research & development activities, and product launches in the FRP Rebar market.
- Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets – the report analyses the FRP rebar market across varied regions.
- Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about services, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the FRP rebar market.
- Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and product offerings of leading players like Dextra Group (Thailand), Pultron Composites (New Zealand), Pultrall Inc. (Canada), Schцck Bauteile GmbH (Germany), Sireg S.P.A. (Italy), Kodiak Fiberglass Rebar (US), Neuvokas Corporation (US), Rцchling Group (Germany), Armastek (Russia), TUF Bar (Canada), ARC Insulations & Insulator Ltd. (India), Jindal Advanced Materials (India), SKD Composites (India), Galen Composites (Russia), and ICSC (Saudi Arabia).
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
1.3 STUDY SCOPE
1.3.1 MARKETS COVERED AND REGIONAL SCOPE
1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED
1.3.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
1.3.5 UNITS CONSIDERED
1.4 LIMITATIONS
1.5 STAKEHOLDERS
1.6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH DATA
2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources
2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources
2.1.2.2 Key primary participants
2.1.2.3 Breakdown of interviews with experts
2.1.2.4 Key industry insights
2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
2.2.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
2.2.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
2.3 BASE NUMBER CALCULATION
2.3.1 APPROACH 1: SUPPLY-SIDE ANALYSIS
2.3.2 APPROACH 2: DEMAND-SIDE ANALYSIS
2.4 GROWTH FORECAST
2.4.1 SUPPLY SIDE
2.4.2 DEMAND SIDE
2.5 DATA TRIANGULATION
2.6 FACTOR ANALYSIS
2.7 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
2.8 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS AND RISK ASSESSMENT
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS
4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN FRP REBAR MARKET
4.2 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION AND REGION
4.3 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
4.4 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
4.5 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
4.6 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
4.7 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY SURFACE TREATMENT
4.8 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
4.9 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY KEY COUNTRY
5 MARKET OVERVIEW
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
5.2.1 DRIVERS
5.2.1.1 Increasing demand in construction industry
5.2.1.2 Government-led regulations on use of FRP rebars
5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
5.2.2.1 Availability of substitutes
5.2.2.2 High cost of FRP rebars
5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
5.2.3.1 Rising investments in large-scale civil engineering projects
5.2.3.2 Growing use in construction of highways and bridges
5.2.4 CHALLENGES
5.2.4.1 Supply chain and manufacturing constraints
5.2.4.2 Inability to completely replace steel rebar
5.3 PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
5.3.1 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
5.3.2 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
5.3.3 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
5.3.4 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
5.3.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
5.4 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
5.4.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
5.4.2 BUYING CRITERIA
5.5 PRICING ANALYSIS
5.5.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY APPLICATION, 2023
5.5.2 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY FIBER TYPE, 2021–2024
5.5.3 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY RESIN TYPE, 2021–2024
5.5.4 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY DIAMETER, 2021–2024
5.5.5 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY TENSILE STRENGTH, 2021–2024
5.5.6 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY SURFACE TREATMENT, 2021–2024
5.5.7 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY APPLICATION, 2021–2024
5.5.8 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY REGION, 2021–2024
5.6 MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
5.6.1 INTRODUCTION
5.6.2 GDP TRENDS AND FORECAST
5.6.3 TRENDS IN GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
5.7 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
5.8 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
5.9 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
5.10 TRADE ANALYSIS
5.10.1 EXPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 7019)
5.10.2 IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 7019)
5.10.3 EXPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 681511)
5.10.4 IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 681511)
5.11 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
5.11.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
5.11.1.1 Pultrusion technology
5.11.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
5.11.2.1 Filament winding
5.12 PATENT ANALYSIS
5.12.1 INTRODUCTION
5.12.2 METHODOLOGY
5.12.3 DOCUMENT TYPES
5.12.4 INSIGHTS
5.12.5 LEGAL STATUS
5.12.6 JURISDICTION ANALYSIS
5.12.7 TOP APPLICANTS
5.12.8 TOP 10 PATENT OWNERS (US) IN LAST 10 YEARS
5.13 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
5.13.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES,
AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
5.13.2 TRADE REGULATIONS
5.14 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2025–2026
5.15 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
5.15.1 USE OF GFRP REBAR IN DELHI METRO PHASE 3
5.15.2 JIZAN FLOOD MITIGATION CHANNEL – WORLD’S LARGEST
GFRP REBAR PROJECT
5.15.3 MUSKRAT FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT, CANADA –
GFRP REBAR FOR LONG-TERM DURABILITY
5.16 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
5.17 IMPACT OF GEN AI/AI ON FRP REBAR MARKET
5.17.1 TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
5.17.2 CASE STUDIES OF AI IMPLEMENTATION IN FRP REBAR MARKET
5.18 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
5.19 TRUMP TARIFF IMPACT ON FRP REBAR MARKET
5.19.1 INTRODUCTION
5.19.2 KEY TARIFF RATES
5.19.3 PRICE IMPACT ANALYSIS
5.19.4 KEY IMPACTS ON MAJOR REGIONS/COUNTRIES
5.19.4.1 US
5.19.4.2 Europe
5.19.4.3 Asia Pacific
5.19.5 IMPACTS ON END USERS
6 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.2 GLASS FIBER
6.2.1 PRESENCE OF LARGE NUMBER OF GFRP REBAR MANUFACTURERS
TO DRIVE MARKET
6.3 CARBON FIBER
6.3.1 LIGHTWEIGHT PROPERTY OF CFRP REBAR TO FUEL DEMAND
6.4 BASALT FIBER
6.4.1 CORROSION RESISTANCE, HIGH STRENGTH-TO-WEIGHT RATIO,
AND LONG-TERM DURABILITY TO DRIVE DEMAND
7 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.2 VINYL ESTER
7.2.1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VINLY ESTER TO DRIVE MARKET
7.3 EPOXY
7.3.1 INNOVATIONS IN APPLICATIONS OF EPOXY RESINS IN FRP REBAR
TO FUEL DEMAND
7.4 OTHER RESIN TYPES
8 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 LOW STRENGTH (<1,000 MPA)
8.2.1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW-STRENGTH REBARS
TO DRIVE DEMAND
8.3 MEDIUM STRENGTH (1,000–2,000 MPA)
8.3.1 INCREASING R&D RELATED TO FRP REBAR TO FUEL DEMAND
8.4 HIGH STRENGTH (<2,000 MPA)
8.4.1 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS IN CFRP REBARS TO FUEL DEMAND
9 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 <10 MM
9.2.1 EASY AVAILABILITY TO DRIVE MARKET
9.3 10–20 MM
9.3.1 ABILITY TO ALIGN WITH STANDARD REINFORCED CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION TO FUEL DEMAND
9.4 >20 MM
9.4.1 INCREASING APPLICATIONS IN HEAVY-DUTY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS TO FUEL MARKET GROWTH
10 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY SURFACE TREATMENT
10.1 INTRODUCTION
10.2 SAND COATED
10.2.1 SUPERIOR SURFACE ROUGHNESS TO DRIVE DEMAND
10.3 RIBBED
10.3.1 INTERLOCKING PROPERTY OF RIBBED FRP REBARS TO FUEL DEMAND
10.4 OTHER SURFACE TREATMENTS
11 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
11.1 INTRODUCTION
11.2 HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES & BUILDINGS
11.2.1 RISING APPLICATIONS IN BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TO DRIVE MARKET
11.3 MARINE STRUCTURES & WATERFRONTS
11.3.1 NON-CORROSIVE PROPERTY OF FRP REBARS TO FUEL DEMAND
11.4 WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
11.4.1 SUPERIOR CORROSION RESISTANCE TO BOOST DEMAND
11.5 OTHER APPLICATIONS
12 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY REGION
12.1 INTRODUCTION
12.2 NORTH AMERICA
12.2.1 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.2.2 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.2.3 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.2.4 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.2.5 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.2.6 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.2.6.1 US
12.2.6.1.1 Presence of major FRP rebar manufacturers to drive market
12.2.6.2 Canada
12.2.6.2.1 Harsh environmental conditions to propel market
12.3 EUROPE
12.3.1 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.3.2 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.3.3 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.3.4 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.3.5 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.3.6 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.3.6.1 Germany
12.3.6.1.1 Rising construction projects to drive market
12.3.6.2 France
12.3.6.2.1 Technological innovations to fuel demand
12.3.6.3 UK
12.3.6.3.1 Increasing demand for lightweight and high-performance materials to drive market
12.3.6.4 Italy
12.3.6.4.1 Growing demand in wind energy industry to drive market
12.3.6.5 Russia
12.3.6.5.1 Presence of established manufacturers to drive market
12.3.6.6 Rest of Europe
12.4 ASIA PACIFIC
12.4.1 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.4.2 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.4.3 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.4.4 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.4.5 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.4.6 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.4.6.1 China
12.4.6.1.1 Increasing construction projects to drive market
12.4.6.2 South Korea
12.4.6.2.1 Ongoing research & development for FRP rebars to accelerate demand
12.4.6.3 India
12.4.6.3.1 Increasing government-led investments in transportation sector to drive market
12.4.6.4 Japan
12.4.6.4.1 Growing demand from civil infrastructure to drive market
12.4.6.5 Rest of Asia Pacific
12.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
12.5.1 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.5.2 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.5.3 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.5.4 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.5.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.5.6 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.5.6.1 GCC Countries
12.5.6.1.1 UAE
12.5.6.1.1.1 Increasing infrastructure development projects to
propel market
12.5.6.1.2 Saudi Arabia
12.5.6.1.2.1 Increasing partnerships with major manufacturers to drive market
12.5.6.1.3 Rest of GCC Countries
12.5.6.2 South Africa
12.5.6.2.1 Growing adoption in construction industry to drive market
12.5.6.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
12.6 LATIN AMERICA
12.6.1 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.6.2 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.6.3 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.6.4 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.6.5 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.6.6 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.6.6.1 Mexico
12.6.6.1.1 Growing demand for sustainable infrastructure to
drive market
12.6.6.2 Brazil
12.6.6.2.1 High-value construction projects to drive demand
12.6.6.3 Rest of Latin America
13 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
13.1 OVERVIEW
13.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
13.3 REVENUE ANALYSIS
13.4 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
13.5 BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
13.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
13.6.1 STARS
13.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS
13.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
13.6.4 PARTICIPANTS
13.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
13.6.5.1 Company footprint
13.6.5.2 Region footprint
13.6.5.3 Fiber type footprint
13.6.5.4 Resin type footprint
13.6.5.5 Diameter footprint
13.6.5.6 Surface treatment footprint
13.6.5.7 Tensile strength footprint
13.6.5.8 Application footprint
13.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
13.7.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
13.7.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
13.7.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
13.7.4 STARTING BLOCKS
13.7.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
13.7.5.1 Detailed list of key startups/SMEs
13.7.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of key startups/SMEs
13.8 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
13.8.1 PRODUCT LAUNCHES
13.8.2 DEALS
13.8.3 EXPANSIONS
14 COMPANY PROFILES
14.1 KEY PLAYERS
14.1.1 DEXTRA GROUP
14.1.1.1 Business overview
14.1.1.2 Products offered
14.1.1.3 Recent developments
14.1.1.3.1 Deals
14.1.1.3.2 Others
14.1.1.4 MnM view
14.1.1.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.2 SCHЦCK BAUTEILE GMBH
14.1.2.1 Business overview
14.1.2.2 Products offered
14.1.2.3 MnM view
14.1.2.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.2.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.2.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.3 PULTRON COMPOSITES
14.1.3.1 Business overview
14.1.3.2 Products offered
14.1.3.3 Recent developments
14.1.3.3.1 Product launches
14.1.3.3.2 Deals
14.1.3.3.3 Expansions
14.1.3.3.4 Others
14.1.3.4 MnM view
14.1.3.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.3.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.3.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.4 SIREG S.P.A.
14.1.4.1 Business overview
14.1.4.2 Products offered
14.1.4.3 Recent developments
14.1.4.3.1 Deals
14.1.4.3.2 Others
14.1.4.4 MnM view
14.1.4.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.4.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.4.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.5 PULTRALL INC.
14.1.5.1 Business overview
14.1.5.2 Products offered
14.1.5.3 Recent developments
14.1.5.3.1 Deals
14.1.5.4 MnM view
14.1.5.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.6 KODIAK FIBERGLASS REBAR
14.1.6.1 Business overview
14.1.6.2 Products offered
14.1.6.3 MnM view
14.1.6.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.6.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.6.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.7 NEUVOKAS CORPORATION
14.1.7.1 Business overview
14.1.7.2 Products offered
14.1.7.3 Recent developments
14.1.7.3.1 Deals
14.1.7.4 MnM view
14.1.7.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.7.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.7.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.8 RЦCHLING
14.1.8.1 Business overview
14.1.8.2 Products offered
14.1.8.3 MnM view
14.1.8.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.8.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.8.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.9 ARC INSULATIONS & INSULATOR LTD.
14.1.9.1 Business overview
14.1.9.2 Products offered
14.1.9.3 MnM view
14.1.9.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.9.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.9.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.10 JINDAL ADVANCED MATERIALS
14.1.10.1 Business overview
14.1.10.2 Products offered
14.1.10.3 Recent developments
14.1.10.3.1 Expansions
14.1.10.4 MnM view
14.1.10.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.10.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.10.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.11 SKD COMPOSITE
14.1.11.1 Business overview
14.1.11.2 Products offered
14.1.11.3 MnM view
14.1.11.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.11.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.11.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.12 GALEN LLC
14.1.12.1 Business overview
14.1.12.2 Products offered
14.1.12.3 MnM view
14.1.12.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.12.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.12.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.13 FIBROLUX
14.1.13.1 Business overview
14.1.13.2 Products offered
14.1.13.3 Recent developments
14.1.13.3.1 Deals
14.1.13.4 MnM view
14.1.13.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.13.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.13.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.14 FRT TUF-BAR
14.1.14.1 Business overview
14.1.14.2 Products offered
14.1.14.3 MnM view
14.1.14.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.14.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.14.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.15 ARMASTEK
14.1.15.1 Business overview
14.1.15.2 Products offered
14.1.15.3 Recent developments
14.1.15.3.1 Deals
14.1.15.4 MnM view
14.1.15.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.15.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.15.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.2 OTHER PLAYERS
14.2.1 FIREP
14.2.2 MST REBAR INC.
14.2.3 MRG COMPOSITES REBAR
14.2.4 ANTOP GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
14.2.5 ARAB BASALT FIBER COMPANY
14.2.6 ICSC
14.2.7 ROCKREBAR
14.2.8 REGBAR
14.2.9 HENAN ZHONGSHENG COMPOSITE MATERIAL CO., LTD.
14.2.10 COMPOSITE GROUP CHELYABINSK
15 APPENDIX
15.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
15.2 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
15.3 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
15.4 RELATED REPORTS
15.5 AUTHOR DETAILS
1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
1.3 STUDY SCOPE
1.3.1 MARKETS COVERED AND REGIONAL SCOPE
1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED
1.3.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
1.3.5 UNITS CONSIDERED
1.4 LIMITATIONS
1.5 STAKEHOLDERS
1.6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 RESEARCH DATA
2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
2.1.1.1 Key data from secondary sources
2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
2.1.2.1 Key data from primary sources
2.1.2.2 Key primary participants
2.1.2.3 Breakdown of interviews with experts
2.1.2.4 Key industry insights
2.2 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
2.2.1 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
2.2.2 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
2.3 BASE NUMBER CALCULATION
2.3.1 APPROACH 1: SUPPLY-SIDE ANALYSIS
2.3.2 APPROACH 2: DEMAND-SIDE ANALYSIS
2.4 GROWTH FORECAST
2.4.1 SUPPLY SIDE
2.4.2 DEMAND SIDE
2.5 DATA TRIANGULATION
2.6 FACTOR ANALYSIS
2.7 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
2.8 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS AND RISK ASSESSMENT
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS
4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN FRP REBAR MARKET
4.2 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION AND REGION
4.3 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
4.4 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
4.5 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
4.6 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
4.7 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY SURFACE TREATMENT
4.8 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
4.9 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY KEY COUNTRY
5 MARKET OVERVIEW
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 MARKET DYNAMICS
5.2.1 DRIVERS
5.2.1.1 Increasing demand in construction industry
5.2.1.2 Government-led regulations on use of FRP rebars
5.2.2 RESTRAINTS
5.2.2.1 Availability of substitutes
5.2.2.2 High cost of FRP rebars
5.2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
5.2.3.1 Rising investments in large-scale civil engineering projects
5.2.3.2 Growing use in construction of highways and bridges
5.2.4 CHALLENGES
5.2.4.1 Supply chain and manufacturing constraints
5.2.4.2 Inability to completely replace steel rebar
5.3 PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
5.3.1 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
5.3.2 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
5.3.3 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
5.3.4 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
5.3.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
5.4 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
5.4.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
5.4.2 BUYING CRITERIA
5.5 PRICING ANALYSIS
5.5.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY APPLICATION, 2023
5.5.2 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY FIBER TYPE, 2021–2024
5.5.3 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY RESIN TYPE, 2021–2024
5.5.4 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY DIAMETER, 2021–2024
5.5.5 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY TENSILE STRENGTH, 2021–2024
5.5.6 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY SURFACE TREATMENT, 2021–2024
5.5.7 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY APPLICATION, 2021–2024
5.5.8 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND, BY REGION, 2021–2024
5.6 MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
5.6.1 INTRODUCTION
5.6.2 GDP TRENDS AND FORECAST
5.6.3 TRENDS IN GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
5.7 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
5.8 SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS
5.9 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
5.10 TRADE ANALYSIS
5.10.1 EXPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 7019)
5.10.2 IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 7019)
5.10.3 EXPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 681511)
5.10.4 IMPORT SCENARIO (HS CODE 681511)
5.11 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
5.11.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
5.11.1.1 Pultrusion technology
5.11.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
5.11.2.1 Filament winding
5.12 PATENT ANALYSIS
5.12.1 INTRODUCTION
5.12.2 METHODOLOGY
5.12.3 DOCUMENT TYPES
5.12.4 INSIGHTS
5.12.5 LEGAL STATUS
5.12.6 JURISDICTION ANALYSIS
5.12.7 TOP APPLICANTS
5.12.8 TOP 10 PATENT OWNERS (US) IN LAST 10 YEARS
5.13 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
5.13.1 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES,
AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
5.13.2 TRADE REGULATIONS
5.14 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2025–2026
5.15 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
5.15.1 USE OF GFRP REBAR IN DELHI METRO PHASE 3
5.15.2 JIZAN FLOOD MITIGATION CHANNEL – WORLD’S LARGEST
GFRP REBAR PROJECT
5.15.3 MUSKRAT FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT, CANADA –
GFRP REBAR FOR LONG-TERM DURABILITY
5.16 TRENDS/DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
5.17 IMPACT OF GEN AI/AI ON FRP REBAR MARKET
5.17.1 TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
5.17.2 CASE STUDIES OF AI IMPLEMENTATION IN FRP REBAR MARKET
5.18 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
5.19 TRUMP TARIFF IMPACT ON FRP REBAR MARKET
5.19.1 INTRODUCTION
5.19.2 KEY TARIFF RATES
5.19.3 PRICE IMPACT ANALYSIS
5.19.4 KEY IMPACTS ON MAJOR REGIONS/COUNTRIES
5.19.4.1 US
5.19.4.2 Europe
5.19.4.3 Asia Pacific
5.19.5 IMPACTS ON END USERS
6 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.2 GLASS FIBER
6.2.1 PRESENCE OF LARGE NUMBER OF GFRP REBAR MANUFACTURERS
TO DRIVE MARKET
6.3 CARBON FIBER
6.3.1 LIGHTWEIGHT PROPERTY OF CFRP REBAR TO FUEL DEMAND
6.4 BASALT FIBER
6.4.1 CORROSION RESISTANCE, HIGH STRENGTH-TO-WEIGHT RATIO,
AND LONG-TERM DURABILITY TO DRIVE DEMAND
7 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.2 VINYL ESTER
7.2.1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VINLY ESTER TO DRIVE MARKET
7.3 EPOXY
7.3.1 INNOVATIONS IN APPLICATIONS OF EPOXY RESINS IN FRP REBAR
TO FUEL DEMAND
7.4 OTHER RESIN TYPES
8 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 LOW STRENGTH (<1,000 MPA)
8.2.1 COST-EFFECTIVENESS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW-STRENGTH REBARS
TO DRIVE DEMAND
8.3 MEDIUM STRENGTH (1,000–2,000 MPA)
8.3.1 INCREASING R&D RELATED TO FRP REBAR TO FUEL DEMAND
8.4 HIGH STRENGTH (<2,000 MPA)
8.4.1 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS IN CFRP REBARS TO FUEL DEMAND
9 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 <10 MM
9.2.1 EASY AVAILABILITY TO DRIVE MARKET
9.3 10–20 MM
9.3.1 ABILITY TO ALIGN WITH STANDARD REINFORCED CONCRETE
CONSTRUCTION TO FUEL DEMAND
9.4 >20 MM
9.4.1 INCREASING APPLICATIONS IN HEAVY-DUTY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS TO FUEL MARKET GROWTH
10 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY SURFACE TREATMENT
10.1 INTRODUCTION
10.2 SAND COATED
10.2.1 SUPERIOR SURFACE ROUGHNESS TO DRIVE DEMAND
10.3 RIBBED
10.3.1 INTERLOCKING PROPERTY OF RIBBED FRP REBARS TO FUEL DEMAND
10.4 OTHER SURFACE TREATMENTS
11 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
11.1 INTRODUCTION
11.2 HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES & BUILDINGS
11.2.1 RISING APPLICATIONS IN BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TO DRIVE MARKET
11.3 MARINE STRUCTURES & WATERFRONTS
11.3.1 NON-CORROSIVE PROPERTY OF FRP REBARS TO FUEL DEMAND
11.4 WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
11.4.1 SUPERIOR CORROSION RESISTANCE TO BOOST DEMAND
11.5 OTHER APPLICATIONS
12 FRP REBAR MARKET, BY REGION
12.1 INTRODUCTION
12.2 NORTH AMERICA
12.2.1 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.2.2 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.2.3 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.2.4 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.2.5 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.2.6 NORTH AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.2.6.1 US
12.2.6.1.1 Presence of major FRP rebar manufacturers to drive market
12.2.6.2 Canada
12.2.6.2.1 Harsh environmental conditions to propel market
12.3 EUROPE
12.3.1 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.3.2 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.3.3 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.3.4 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.3.5 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.3.6 EUROPE: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.3.6.1 Germany
12.3.6.1.1 Rising construction projects to drive market
12.3.6.2 France
12.3.6.2.1 Technological innovations to fuel demand
12.3.6.3 UK
12.3.6.3.1 Increasing demand for lightweight and high-performance materials to drive market
12.3.6.4 Italy
12.3.6.4.1 Growing demand in wind energy industry to drive market
12.3.6.5 Russia
12.3.6.5.1 Presence of established manufacturers to drive market
12.3.6.6 Rest of Europe
12.4 ASIA PACIFIC
12.4.1 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.4.2 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.4.3 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.4.4 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.4.5 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.4.6 ASIA PACIFIC: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.4.6.1 China
12.4.6.1.1 Increasing construction projects to drive market
12.4.6.2 South Korea
12.4.6.2.1 Ongoing research & development for FRP rebars to accelerate demand
12.4.6.3 India
12.4.6.3.1 Increasing government-led investments in transportation sector to drive market
12.4.6.4 Japan
12.4.6.4.1 Growing demand from civil infrastructure to drive market
12.4.6.5 Rest of Asia Pacific
12.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
12.5.1 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.5.2 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.5.3 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.5.4 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.5.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.5.6 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.5.6.1 GCC Countries
12.5.6.1.1 UAE
12.5.6.1.1.1 Increasing infrastructure development projects to
propel market
12.5.6.1.2 Saudi Arabia
12.5.6.1.2.1 Increasing partnerships with major manufacturers to drive market
12.5.6.1.3 Rest of GCC Countries
12.5.6.2 South Africa
12.5.6.2.1 Growing adoption in construction industry to drive market
12.5.6.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
12.6 LATIN AMERICA
12.6.1 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY FIBER TYPE
12.6.2 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY RESIN TYPE
12.6.3 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY TENSILE STRENGTH
12.6.4 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY DIAMETER
12.6.5 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY APPLICATION
12.6.6 LATIN AMERICA: FRP REBAR MARKET, BY COUNTRY
12.6.6.1 Mexico
12.6.6.1.1 Growing demand for sustainable infrastructure to
drive market
12.6.6.2 Brazil
12.6.6.2.1 High-value construction projects to drive demand
12.6.6.3 Rest of Latin America
13 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
13.1 OVERVIEW
13.2 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
13.3 REVENUE ANALYSIS
13.4 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
13.5 BRAND/PRODUCT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
13.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
13.6.1 STARS
13.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS
13.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
13.6.4 PARTICIPANTS
13.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2024
13.6.5.1 Company footprint
13.6.5.2 Region footprint
13.6.5.3 Fiber type footprint
13.6.5.4 Resin type footprint
13.6.5.5 Diameter footprint
13.6.5.6 Surface treatment footprint
13.6.5.7 Tensile strength footprint
13.6.5.8 Application footprint
13.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
13.7.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
13.7.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
13.7.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
13.7.4 STARTING BLOCKS
13.7.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES, 2024
13.7.5.1 Detailed list of key startups/SMEs
13.7.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of key startups/SMEs
13.8 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
13.8.1 PRODUCT LAUNCHES
13.8.2 DEALS
13.8.3 EXPANSIONS
14 COMPANY PROFILES
14.1 KEY PLAYERS
14.1.1 DEXTRA GROUP
14.1.1.1 Business overview
14.1.1.2 Products offered
14.1.1.3 Recent developments
14.1.1.3.1 Deals
14.1.1.3.2 Others
14.1.1.4 MnM view
14.1.1.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.2 SCHЦCK BAUTEILE GMBH
14.1.2.1 Business overview
14.1.2.2 Products offered
14.1.2.3 MnM view
14.1.2.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.2.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.2.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.3 PULTRON COMPOSITES
14.1.3.1 Business overview
14.1.3.2 Products offered
14.1.3.3 Recent developments
14.1.3.3.1 Product launches
14.1.3.3.2 Deals
14.1.3.3.3 Expansions
14.1.3.3.4 Others
14.1.3.4 MnM view
14.1.3.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.3.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.3.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.4 SIREG S.P.A.
14.1.4.1 Business overview
14.1.4.2 Products offered
14.1.4.3 Recent developments
14.1.4.3.1 Deals
14.1.4.3.2 Others
14.1.4.4 MnM view
14.1.4.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.4.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.4.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.5 PULTRALL INC.
14.1.5.1 Business overview
14.1.5.2 Products offered
14.1.5.3 Recent developments
14.1.5.3.1 Deals
14.1.5.4 MnM view
14.1.5.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.6 KODIAK FIBERGLASS REBAR
14.1.6.1 Business overview
14.1.6.2 Products offered
14.1.6.3 MnM view
14.1.6.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.6.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.6.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.7 NEUVOKAS CORPORATION
14.1.7.1 Business overview
14.1.7.2 Products offered
14.1.7.3 Recent developments
14.1.7.3.1 Deals
14.1.7.4 MnM view
14.1.7.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.7.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.7.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.8 RЦCHLING
14.1.8.1 Business overview
14.1.8.2 Products offered
14.1.8.3 MnM view
14.1.8.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.8.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.8.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.9 ARC INSULATIONS & INSULATOR LTD.
14.1.9.1 Business overview
14.1.9.2 Products offered
14.1.9.3 MnM view
14.1.9.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.9.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.9.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.10 JINDAL ADVANCED MATERIALS
14.1.10.1 Business overview
14.1.10.2 Products offered
14.1.10.3 Recent developments
14.1.10.3.1 Expansions
14.1.10.4 MnM view
14.1.10.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.10.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.10.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.11 SKD COMPOSITE
14.1.11.1 Business overview
14.1.11.2 Products offered
14.1.11.3 MnM view
14.1.11.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.11.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.11.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.12 GALEN LLC
14.1.12.1 Business overview
14.1.12.2 Products offered
14.1.12.3 MnM view
14.1.12.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.12.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.12.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.13 FIBROLUX
14.1.13.1 Business overview
14.1.13.2 Products offered
14.1.13.3 Recent developments
14.1.13.3.1 Deals
14.1.13.4 MnM view
14.1.13.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.13.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.13.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.14 FRT TUF-BAR
14.1.14.1 Business overview
14.1.14.2 Products offered
14.1.14.3 MnM view
14.1.14.3.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.14.3.2 Strategic choices
14.1.14.3.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.1.15 ARMASTEK
14.1.15.1 Business overview
14.1.15.2 Products offered
14.1.15.3 Recent developments
14.1.15.3.1 Deals
14.1.15.4 MnM view
14.1.15.4.1 Key strengths/Right to win
14.1.15.4.2 Strategic choices
14.1.15.4.3 Weaknesses/Competitive threats
14.2 OTHER PLAYERS
14.2.1 FIREP
14.2.2 MST REBAR INC.
14.2.3 MRG COMPOSITES REBAR
14.2.4 ANTOP GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
14.2.5 ARAB BASALT FIBER COMPANY
14.2.6 ICSC
14.2.7 ROCKREBAR
14.2.8 REGBAR
14.2.9 HENAN ZHONGSHENG COMPOSITE MATERIAL CO., LTD.
14.2.10 COMPOSITE GROUP CHELYABINSK
15 APPENDIX
15.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
15.2 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS’ SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
15.3 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
15.4 RELATED REPORTS
15.5 AUTHOR DETAILS
