[email protected] +44 20 8123 2220 (UK) +1 732 587 5005 (US) Contact Us | FAQ |

Top Five Global Cable Companies: Performance, Strategies and Competitive Analysis, May 2013

May 2013 | 60 pages | ID: TD1D1322699EN
Lucintel

US$ 1,980.00

E-mail Delivery (PDF)

Download PDF Leaflet

Accepted cards
Wire Transfer
Checkout Later
Need Help? Ask a Question
The global cable industry is forecasted to witness a strong growth during the forecast period, to reach an estimated $117.71 billion by 2017. The industry is fragmented with the top three and top five players. The key strategy followed by the major players is innovation and new technological development. The main focus is to deliver unique solution and value to the customer through better efficiency in the operation of work.

Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis on the cable industry and presents its findings in "Top Five Global Cable Companies: Performance, Strategies and Competitive Analysis". This report briefly discusses the subject companies, their geographic footprints, financial metrics, market performance, marketing and corporate strategies and SWOT analysis.

The report describes that the some of the Companies are subjected to legal proceeding from time to time which may affect their images in the industry and also may hamper their operations as the competitive rivalry in the industry is quite intense. The financial crisis caused by the European sovereign debt has slowed down the pace of the industry growth rate.

Lucintel analyses the major drivers of the industry. Continuous expansion program provides the Companies with opportunities to increase their share of products, technologies and services. There is a rising demand from the emerging economies such as Russia, Brazil, India, the Gulf States, APAC region and Africa.

The report gives an overview of the top five global cable companies:
  • Nexans SA Inc.
  • NKT Holdings A/S
  • Prysmian SPA
  • Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
  • Walsin Lihwa Corporation
Industry has high profitability as it recovered from recessionary period and now is in growing phase with rising population and consumer spending power.

This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global cable companies industry. In today’s chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business.
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2. MARKET DEFINITION AND SCOPE

3. MARKET OPPORTUNITY

4. COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING (FINANCIAL AND MARKET)

Company Profile on Following Parameters
  Company Overview
  Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
  SWOT Analysis
  Product Positioning
  Marketing Strategy and Tactics
  Corporate Strategy

5. COMPANY PROFILE ON NEXANS SA INC.

6. COMPANY PROFILE ON NKT HOLDINGS A/S

7. COMPANY PROFILE ON PRYSMIAN SPA

8. COMPANY PROFILE ON SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, LTD.

9. COMPANY PROFILE ON WALSIN LIHWA CORPORATION

LIST OF FIGURES AND CHARTS

CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for cable market
Figure 3.2: Global cable industry annual trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.3: Global cable industry regional trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.4: Global cable industry regional trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.5: Global cable industry segment trend 2006-2011 (US $B)
Figure 3.6: Global cable industry segment trend 2006-2011 (%)
Figure 3.7: Global cable industry opportunity by region
Figure 3.8: Global cable industry opportunity by segment
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Top five cable companies – financial benchmarking
Figure 4.2: Global top five cable companies gross profit and net profit analysis – 2011
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Market share of top players 2006
Figure 4.5: Market share of top players 2011
Figure 4.6: 2006 Market share analysis
Figure 4.7: 2011 Market share analysis
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis 2011
Figure 4.9: Global market fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America (US $B)
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe (US $B)
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific (US $B)
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW (US $B)
Figure 4.14: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional revenue evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Nexans SA Inc.
Figure 5.1: Nexans SA Inc.’s revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel Triad – Nexans SA Inc.
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking Nexans SA Inc. against top three and top five
industry players’ average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Nexans SA Inc. against Top Five best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Nexans SA Inc. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend Vs Nexans SA Inc. 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.15: Nexans SA Inc. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Nexans SA Inc. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Nexans SA Inc. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 5.18: Nexans SA Inc. productivity 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.19: Nexans SA Inc. fixed asset value 2007-2011 (US $M)
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of NKT Holdings A/S
Figure 6.1: NKT Holdings A/S revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - NKT Holdings A/S
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of NKT Holdings A/S against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of NKT Holdings A/S against Top five best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for NKT Holdings A/S (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs. NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (US $B)
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend Vs NKT Holdings A/S 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: NKT Holdings A/S trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: NKT Holdings A/S trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 6.17: Comparison of NKT Holdings A/S R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 6.18: NKT Holdings A/S productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.19: NKT Holdings A/S fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Prysmian SPA
Figure 7.1: Prysmian SPA revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad – Prysmian SPA
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Prysmian SPA against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of Prysmian SPA against Top five best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend Vs Prysmian SPA (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.15: Prysmian SPA trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 7.16: Prysmian SPA trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 7.17: Comparison of Prysmian SPA R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 7.18: Prysmian SPA productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.19: Prysmian SPA fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 7.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
Figure 8.1: Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad – Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. against Top five best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend Vs Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 8.16: Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 8.18: Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.19: Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Walsin Lihwa Corporation
Figure 9.1: Walsin Lihwa Corporation revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad – Walsin Lihwa Corporation
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Walsin Lihwa Corporation against top three and top five industry players’ average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Walsin Lihwa Corporation against Top five best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (US $B)
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend Vs Walsin Lihwa Corporation (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Walsin Lihwa Corporation trend in R&D expenses 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 9.16: Walsin Lihwa Corporation trend in R&D expenses percentage of total revenue
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Walsin Lihwa Corporation R&D expenditure vs top three & top five players average 2011
Figure 9.18: Walsin Lihwa Corporation productivity 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.19: Walsin Lihwa Corporation fixed asset value 2007-2011 in (US $M)
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution

LIST OF TABLES

CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Industry parameters of global cable industry
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Regional revenue growth rate
Table 3.4: Segment revenue growth rate
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top five global cable companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top five cable companies
Table 4.3: Regional revenue (US $M)
Table 4.4: Regional revenue (%)
Table 4.5: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.6: Lucintel triad - Top five major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Nexans SA Inc.
Table 5.1: Market served – Nexans SA Inc.
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad – Nexans SA Inc.
Table 5.3: Financial Benchmarking of Nexans SA Inc. against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of NKT Holdings A/S
Table 6.1: Market served – NKT Holdings A/S
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad – NKT Holdings A/S
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of NKT Holdings A/S against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of Prysmian SPA
Table 7.1: Market served – Prysmian SPA
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad – Prysmian SPA
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of Prysmian SPA against best and against Top three and Top five industry players’ average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
Table 8.1: Market served – Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad – Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
Table 8.3: Financial Benchmarking of Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Walsin Lihwa Corporation
Table 9.1: Markets Served – Walsin Lihwa Corporation
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad – Walsin Lihwa Corporation
Table 9.3: Financial Benchmarking of Walsin Lihwa Corporation against best and against Top three and top five industry players’ average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region


More Publications