[email protected] +44 20 8123 2220 (UK) +1 732 587 5005 (US) Contact Us | FAQ |

North America Seed Treatment Market by Type (chemical & non-chemical), by Application (fungicide, insecticide, bio-control and others) and by Crop (cereals, oilseeds and others): Trends, Forecasts and Technical Insights up to 2018

April 2013 | 285 pages | ID: N2397BC5B94EN
MarketsandMarkets

US$ 4,650.00

E-mail Delivery (PDF)

Download PDF Leaflet

Accepted cards
Wire Transfer
Checkout Later
Need Help? Ask a Question
The seed treatment market consists of crop protection chemicals or agrochemicals, specifically for seeds, and genetically modified (GM) crop-seeds. Crop protection chemicals are the most dominating segment of this market in terms of market share as well as product innovations. Seed treatment market is further classified as insecticides (chemical), fungicides (chemical), bio-control seed treatments, and other seed treatment chemicals.

On the basis of types, seed treatment market is further segmented as chemical and non-chemical. Bio-based seed treatments, a part of non-chemical seed treatment, are made up of renewable resources and contain natural active ingredients. These seed treatments have much of a no negative impact on the environment, workforce and consumers safety when compared to chemical seed treatments. Bio-based seed treatment is expected to be one of the fastest growing seed treatment segments in the near future.

Chemical seed treatments, which are typically manufactured from petrochemical or inorganic raw materials, are further segmented as insecticides, fungicides, and other chemical seed treatments. The market is dominated by chemical insecticides, accounting for over 51.3% of the total seed treatment demand in 2012. The fungicide seed treatments market is growing at a CAGR of 7.6% and is expected to reach $692.0 million by 2018. The insecticides seed treatment market is projected to reach $1,161.9 million by 2018, growing at a CAGR of 10.5%

Rising GM seed prices and cost effectiveness of seed treatments over other crop protection methods are expected to drive the demand for the seed treatment market in the near future. However, an absence of centralized government regulations for treated seed and seed treatment active ingredient registration are expected to hamper the growth and demand for seed treatments in the next five years.

One of the critical success factors (CSFs) in the market is the ability of a market participant to innovate a complete protection solution against various biotic and abiotic stresses in a single product. This battle of most of the grower-friendly, crop-friendly and environment-friendly product innovations are going to be one of the key strategy market players following the seed treatment industry in the next five years.

This report estimates the North American seed treatment market in terms of revenue. The market has been further segmented on the basis of crop types such as cereals and grains, oilseeds, and other crops, as well as by the sub-segmentation of insecticides, fungicides, and other chemical seed treatments such as plant growth regulators, and micronutrients. This segmentation is given for major regions and key countries in those regions. Market drivers, restraints and challenges, and crop trends are discussed in detail. Market share by participants for the overall market is discussed in detail in the report. We have also profiled leading players of this industry including Chemtura (U.S.), DuPont (U.S.), Monsanto (U.S.), Valent U.S.A and Wolf Trax (Canada).
1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 KEY TAKE-AWAYS
1.2 REPORT DESCRIPTION
1.3 MARKETS COVERED
1.4 STAKEHOLDERS
1.5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
  1.5.1 MARKET SIZE
  1.5.2 KEY DATA POINTS TAKEN FROM SECONDARY SOURCES
  1.5.3 KEY DATA POINTS TAKEN FROM PRIMARY SOURCES
  1.5.4 ASSUMPTIONS MADE FOR THIS REPORT

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3 MARKET OVERVIEW

3.1 INTRODUCTION
  3.1.1 AGRO-MARKET RETAILERS HELP RAPID GROWTH IN SEED TREATMENT MARKET
3.2 SEED TREATMENT MARKET
  3.2.1 COMMERCIAL SEED TREATMENTS
  3.2.2 DOWNSTREAM SEED TREATMENTS
  3.2.3 GROWER APPLIED SEED TREATMENTS
3.3 GLOBAL SEED MARKET: AN OVERVIEW
  3.3.1 TYPES OF SEED
    3.3.1.1 Seed Sources
      3.3.1.1.1 Farm-saved seed
      3.3.1.1.2 Seed supplied commercially
    3.3.1.2 Seed Types
      3.3.1.2.1 Conventional seed
      3.3.1.2.2 GM seed
  3.3.2 STAGES IN COMMERCIAL SEED PRODUCTION
    3.3.2.1 Foundation or basic seed
    3.3.2.2 Certified seed
3.4 EVOLUTION OF SEED TREATMENT MARKET
3.5 WINNING IMPERATIVE
  3.5.1 SEED TREATMENT AS A COMPLETE SOLUTION TO SAFEGAURD SEED INVESTMENTS
3.6 BURNING ISSUES
  3.6.1 ISSUES IMPACTING INTERNATIONAL SEED MOVEMENTS
  3.6.2 LACK OF COHESIVE REGULATORY BODY FOR SEED TREATMENT APPROVALS
3.7 DRIVERS
  3.7.1 SEED TREATMENT AS A LOW COST CROP PROTECTION SOLUTION
  3.7.2 RISING PRICES OF THE GM CROPS CREATING A NEED FOR CROP PROTECTION
  3.7.3 RISING WORLD POPULATION & FOOD REQUIREMENTS - “4 F’S(FOOD-FUEL-FEED-FIBER)”
  3.7.4 REDUCED RISK OF EXCEEDING MINIMUM RESIDUE LEVEL
  3.7.5 ACREAGE & ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES WARRANT THE NEED FOR TREATED SEEDS
3.8 RESTRAINTS
  3.8.1 DISCOURAGING GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
  3.8.2 LOW PERMITTED SHELF LIFE & DIFFICULTY IN DISPOSAL OF TREATED SEED
3.9 OPPORTUNITIES
  3.9.1 RAPID GROWTH IN BIO-CONTROL SEED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS
3.10 SEED TREATMENT EQUIPMENTS: AN OVERVIEW
  3.10.1 KEY FACTORS
    3.10.1.1 Uniform coverage
    3.10.1.2 Application volumes & rates
  3.10.2 CONTINUOUS SYSTEM
  3.10.3 BATCH SYSTEM
  3.10.4 DUST/POWDER TREATER
  3.10.5 SLURRY TREATER
  3.10.6 ON-FARM/DIRECT TREATER
3.11 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
  3.11.1 GLOBAL MARKET SHARE (REVENUE)
    3.11.1.1 BASF, BAYER and Syngenta – Global leaders
    3.11.1.2 Agreements between market leaders – a key trend
3.12 PATENT ANALYSIS
  3.12.1 NORTH AMERICAN PATENT ANALYSIS BY YEAR
  3.12.2 NORTH AMERICAN PATENT ANALYSIS, BY COMPANY

4 NORTH AMERICA SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY TYPES

4.1 INTRODUCTION
  4.1.1 DRIVERS
    4.1.1.1 Extensive product portfolios by market leaders to hold 85% of the global share
    4.1.1.2 Chemical seed treatments continue to dominate
    4.1.1.3 Insecticides hold major share; bio-control drives future growth
    4.1.1.4 Climatic changes translate into growing demands for fungicidal seed treatment
    4.1.1.5 Strong demand growth from organic farming and integrated pest management (IPM)
    4.1.1.6 Integrating bio-control products with conventional chemicals
    4.1.1.7 Less regulatory pressure & worker/ environment safety
  4.1.2 RESTRAINTS
    4.1.2.1 Variable efficiency and low shelf life
  4.1.3 OPPORTUNITIES
    4.1.3.1 Plant extracts and oil-based seed treatments for organic farming
    4.1.3.2 Seed treatment for abiotic stress
    4.1.3.3 Abiotic stress limiting plant growth
    4.1.3.4 Thermo-seeds
4.2 CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT
  4.2.1 DRIVERS
    4.2.1.1 Insecticide dominate value market; fungicides lead in volumes
  4.2.2 INSECTICIDES
    4.2.2.1 Global productivity and use of combination chemicals drives insecticide demands
    4.2.2.2 Carbamates and pyrethroids dominate global insecticide market
      4.2.2.2.1 Carbamates and organophosphates
      4.2.2.2.2 Pyrethroids
      4.2.2.2.3 Other seed treatment insecticides
  4.2.3 FUNGICIDES
    4.2.3.1 High economic impact has led to use of broad spectrum fungicides
    4.2.3.2 Rhizoctonia and Fusarium key target fungi amongst other seed, soil and air borne species
    4.2.3.3 Triazoles and Diazoles dominate fungicidal seed treatment market
      4.2.3.3.1 Benzimidazoles
      4.2.3.3.2 Triazoles and diazoles
      4.2.3.3.3 Dithiocarbamates
      4.2.3.3.4 Others seed treatment fungicides
      4.2.3.3.5 Carboxin
  4.2.4 OTHERS
    4.2.4.1 Micronutrients
    4.2.4.2 Colorants
    4.2.4.3 Polymers
    4.2.4.4 Phytohormones
    4.2.4.5 Safeners
4.3 NON–CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT
  4.3.1 DRIVER
    4.3.1.1 Revolution in regulatory requirements revives non-chemical seed treatment practices
  4.3.2 TRADITIONAL SEED TREATMENT
    4.3.2.1 Oldest and still the most trusted and cost-effective methods of seed treatment
      4.3.2.1.1 Priming and pelleting
      4.3.2.1.2 Hot water treatments
  4.3.3 BIO-CONTROL
    4.3.3.1 Soybean and Canola drive U.S. dominance in bio-control market
4.4 REST OF CHEMICALS
  4.4.1 NEMATICIDES
    4.4.1.1 Harpin
      4.4.1.1.1 Key feature: Multiple functionalities
      4.4.1.1.2 Pros and cons
    4.4.1.2 Abamectin
      4.4.1.2.1 Key feature: Low toxicity to humans and animals
    4.4.1.3 Spinosad
      4.4.1.3.1 Key feature: Low cost and lasting effect
  4.4.2 INOCULANTS
    4.4.2.1 Rhizobium inoculants
      4.4.2.1.1 Global demands synchronous with Soybean market trends
    4.4.2.2 Azospirillum inoculants
      4.4.2.2.1 Research on root interaction can help boost efficiency and market demand
    4.4.2.3 Other inoculants
      4.4.2.3.1 Azotobacter
      4.4.2.3.2 Acetobacter
    4.4.2.4 Advantages of inoculation
    4.4.2.5 Regulations for commercial inoculants
      4.4.2.5.1 Commercial microbial inoculants enter market
4.5 SEED TREATMENT – APPLICATION TECHNIQUES
  4.5.1 SEED ENCRUSTING
  4.5.2 SEED PELLETING

5 SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY TARGET PROTECTION

5.1 INTRODUCTION
  5.1.1 KEY FEATURES
    5.1.1.1 Key Motive: Improved crop stand, yields and profitability
    5.1.1.2 Fungicides most commonly used; used in combination with insecticides for efficiency
    5.1.1.3 Changing norms and target pathogen physiologies warrant constant modifications
5.2 FUNGICIDES
  5.2.1 KEY FEATURES
    5.2.1.1 Aids seedling emergence in addition to protection
    5.2.1.2 Non-volatile fungicides: The way ahead
  5.2.2 MAIZE/CORN
    5.2.2.1 Soil and seed borne pathogens: Key targets for seed treatment
    5.2.2.2 Faulty crop planting and rotation practices make crop vulnerable
  5.2.3 SOYBEAN
    5.2.3.1 Economic impact of seedling disease: Focus of seed treatment
  5.2.4 COTTON
    5.2.4.1 Global acceptance of Bt cotton and the resultant rising prices drive the cotton market
    5.2.4.2 On-going research; seed treatment demand not growing at the rate of demand for crop
  5.2.5 WHEAT
    5.2.5.1 Seed-borne fungal and root-rots remain the key target for seed treatment
  5.2.6 POTATO
    5.2.6.1 Low commodity price has restricted market growth; not any more
  5.2.7 CANOLA
    5.2.7.1 Economic losses due to blackleg and high value of canola influence seed treatment practices
  5.2.8 RICE
    5.2.8.1 Low cost production along with protection from fungal diseases
    5.2.8.2 Field practices, temperature and rice variant greatly influence need for treatment
  5.2.9 VEGETABLES
    5.2.9.1 Modernization of sector revives seed treatment practices, especially for exotic variants
5.3 INSECTICIDES
  5.3.1 DRIVERS
    5.3.1.1 R&D influential in driving the insecticide seed treatment segment
    5.3.1.2 Used in combination with other pesticides due to low dosage level requirement
5.4 NEMATICIDES
  5.4.1 KEY FEATURES
    5.4.1.1 Target specific product developments lead to demand for nematicides
    5.4.1.2 Developments of Nematicides help boost adoption of seed treatment practices

6 NORTH AMERICA SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY TARGET CROPS

6.1 INTRODUCTION
  6.1.1 DRIVERS
    6.1.1.1 Seed value and vulnerability influences demand dynamics
    6.1.1.2 Maize consumption for biofuels boosts production and seed treatment requirements
    6.1.1.3 Asia and Europe drive wheat seed treatment market with increasing area under cultivation
6.2 CEREALS & GRAINS
  6.2.1 DRIVER
    6.2.1.1 Technology premiums and conventional seeds drive the growth in demand
  6.2.2 MAIZE
    6.2.2.1 Leading market players focus on maize for product development
    6.2.2.2 Vulnerability to soil-borne pathogens drives the need for seed treatment
    6.2.2.3 High evidence of seedling disease in maize creates opportunities for market
  6.2.3 RICE
    6.2.3.1 R&D and development of BT rice boost need for seed treatment practices
    6.2.3.2 Hybrid seeds, privatization of market: Key drivers for increasing demand for seed treatment
  6.2.4 WHEAT
    6.2.4.1 Wheat fungal vulnerability drives need for seed treatment solutions
  6.2.5 SORGHUM
    6.2.5.1 Heavy economic losses due to smut translates into seed treatment need
6.3 OILSEEDS
  6.3.1 DRIVER
    6.3.1.1 New application fields drive need for enhanced production and seed treatment practices
  6.3.2 SOYBEAN
    6.3.2.1 Increasing global oil prices and bio fuel demand propelling market demand
    6.3.2.2 Combined growth of biotech trait and seed market: Key influencer on seed treatment demands
  6.3.3 SUNFLOWER
    6.3.3.1 Rising prices and high demand for production of sunflower oil globally
    6.3.3.2 Biotech trait seed market has more than doubled; driving the seed treatment needs
  6.3.4 COTTON
    6.3.4.1 Changing dynamics in China and India influencing global price trends
    6.3.4.2 High market share of trait premium seeds drives demand for seed treatment
  6.3.5 CANOLA
    6.3.5.1 Biofuel preference for Canola drives demand for higher production volumes
    6.3.5.2 High economic impact of fungal diseases boost demand for seed treatment
    6.3.5.3 Leading trait premium seed manufacturers also push the seed treatment market
6.4 OTHERS
  6.4.1 SUGAR BEETS
    6.4.1.1 Subsidy support for ethanol production revives sugar beets market
    6.4.1.2 Regulatory challenges cast uncertainty on future demands
  6.4.2 VEGETABLES

7 SEED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES: THE FUTURE PROSPECTIVE

7.1 INTRODUCTION
  7.1.1 EVOLUTION OF CROP PROTECTION
  7.1.2 IMPERATIVE NOVEL SEED TREATMENT METHODS
7.2 GENETIC ENGINEERING: KEY TO MODERN AGRICULTURE
  7.2.1 PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH PROMOTING GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
    7.2.1.1 Legislative & regulatory hurdles:
    7.2.1.2 Ambiguous European laws governing GM foods
    7.2.1.3 GM labeling
    7.2.1.4 Consumer antagonism: major deterrent
7.3 NON-TRANSGENIC; NON-GMO BIOTECHNOLOGY CROPS
  7.3.1 TECHNOLOGY TO REPLACE THE IMPACT OF RESOURCES
    7.3.1.1 Crops evolving into Bio-factories
7.4 CIBIUS GLOBAL
  7.4.1 TECHNICAL PROCESS
  7.4.2 ADVANTAGES
7.5 PIONEER (DUPONT)
  7.5.1 ACCELERATED YIELD TECHNOLOGY (AYT SYSTEM)
  7.5.2 ADVANTAGES:
7.6 OKANAGEN SPECIALITY FRUITS INC.
  7.6.1 TECHNICAL PROCESS
  7.6.2 KEY BENEFIT
  7.6.3 MARKET PROSPECTS
7.7 MORFLORA
  7.7.1 TRAITUP PLATFORM: A NEW PARADIGM
    7.7.1.1 An innovative non transgenic technology
  7.7.2 PLATFORM FOR TRAIT INTRODUCTION IN SEEDS
    7.7.2.1 Fastest method to introduce new trait
    7.7.2.2 Cost effective
    7.7.2.3 A complete crop protection solution
  7.7.3 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
  7.7.4 TECHNICAL PROCESS
  7.7.5 ADVANTAGES
  7.7.6 SUMMARY

8 SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY COUNTRY

8.1 INTRODUCTION
  8.1.1 DRIVERS
    8.1.1.1 Regulatory requirements beneficial for seed treatment market
    8.1.1.2 GM seed trends in America translate into demands for seed treatment
    8.1.1.3 Consumer push for organic foods drive bio-control seed treatment market
    8.1.1.4 EPA and USDA norms have provided a boost to seed treatment practices
  8.1.2 U.S.
    8.1.2.1 Saturated market; growth driven by bio-control seed treatment demands
  8.1.3 MEXICO
    8.1.3.1 Maize and wheat fungicidal requirements drive growth in market
  8.1.4 CANADA
    8.1.4.1 Proximity and strong research system translates in to advances in market

9 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

9.1 INTRODUCTION
  9.1.1 AGREEMENTS, COLLOBARATIONS, AND PARTNERSHIPS - MOST PREFERRED STRATEGIC APPROACH
9.2 KEY MARKET STRATEGIES
9.3 MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
9.4 AGREEMENTS, COLLABORATIONS AND PARTNERSHIPS
9.5 EXPANSIONS, INVESTMENTS & OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
9.6 NEW PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY LAUNCHES

10 COMPANY PROFILES (OVERVIEW, FINANCIALS, PRODUCTS & SERVICES, STRATEGY, AND DEVELOPMENTS)

10.1 ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL MARKETING
10.2 BRETTYOUNG LIMITED
10.3 CHEMTURA CORPORATION
10.4 CIBUS GLOBAL
10.5 E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
10.6 MORFLORA
10.7 MONSANTO COMPANY
10.8 VALENT U.S.A. CORPORATION
10.9 WOLF TRAX INCORPORATION (Details on Overview, financials, product & services, strategy, and developments might not be captured in case of unlisted companies.)

APPENDIX

U.S. PATENTS

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY COUNTRIES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 2 SEED TREATMENT MARKET TYPES & BENEFITS
TABLE 3 PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF SEED TREATMENT ON ITS QUALITY
TABLE 4 GLOBAL SEED MARKET REVENUE, 2001 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 5 SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2001 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 6 SEED TREATMENT: UPCOMING PRODUCT INNOVATIONS & PROPOSED PRODUCTS LAUNCH
TABLE 7 SEED TREATMENT AS COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTION
TABLE 8 WORLD POPULATION & PER CAPITA LAND AVAILABLE
TABLE 9 SEED TREATMENT FUNGICIDES
TABLE 10 SEED TREATMENT INSECTICIDES
TABLE 11 GUSTAFSON (BAYER CROPSCIENCE): SEED TREATMENT EQUIPMENT
TABLE 12 NORTH AMERICA SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY TYPE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 13 NORTH AMERICA SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY APPLICATIONS, 2011 – 2018($MILLION)
TABLE 14 CHEMISTRY & BIO-CONTROL COMBINATIONS
TABLE 15 MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION (MIC) OF ESSENTIAL OILS FOR SEED TREATMENT (PPM)
TABLE 16 EFFECT OF THERMAL SEED TREATMENT, BY CROPS, BY PATHOGENS
TABLE 17 NORTH AMERICA CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 18 U.S. SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY APPLICATION, 2011 – 2018-P ($MILLION)
TABLE 19 MEXICO SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY APLICATION, 2011 – 2018-P ($MILLION)
TABLE 20 CANADA SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY APPLICATION, 2011 – 2018-P ($MILLION)
TABLE 21 NORTH AMERICA: INSECTICIDE SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY COUNTRIES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 22 COMMERCIAL ACTIVE INGREDIENTS-CARBAMATE SEED TREATMENTS
TABLE 23 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE SEED TREATMENT PRODUCTS BY ACTIVE INGREDIENT, BY CROPS
TABLE 24 NORTH AMERICA: FUNGICIDE SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY COUNTRIES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 25 COMMON SEED TREATMENT FUNGICIDES
TABLE 26 SEED TREATMENT FUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION MARKET VOLUME, BY CHEMICAL CLASS, 2009 (KILO TONNES)
TABLE 27 COMMERCIAL ACTIVE INGREDIENTS – BENZIMIDAZOLES
TABLE 28 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE TRIAZOLE SEED TREATMENT PRODUCTS, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENTS
TABLE 29 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE SEED TREATMENT PRODUCTS, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENTS
TABLE 30 MICRONUTRIENTS BENEFITS
TABLE 31 RELATIVE RESPONSIVENESS OF SELECTED CROPS TO MICRONUTRIENTS
TABLE 32 HOT WATER SEED TREATMENT, BY CROPS
TABLE 33 NORTH AMERICA: BIO-CONTROL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY COUNTRIES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 34 COMMERCIAL BIO-CONTROL SEED TREATMENTS, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENTS
TABLE 35 COMMERCIAL NEMATICIDES, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENTS, BY CROPS
TABLE 36 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE INOCULANTS, BY CROPS, BY DOSAGES
TABLE 37 RHIZOBIUM INOCULANTS, BY CROPS
TABLE 38 NITROGEN FIXING CAPACITY OF AZOSPIRILLUMN, BY CROPS
TABLE 39 AREA UNDER LEGUME CROPS, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2008 – 2009 (HA)
TABLE 40 SAVING CHEMICAL NUTRIENTS BY USE OF INOCULANTS
TABLE 41 ORGANIC MATERIAL REVIEW INSTITUTE (OMRI) – APPROVED INOCULANTS
TABLE 42 NORTH AMERICA: REST OF CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY COUNTRIES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 43 SEED TREATMENT APPLICATION TECHNIQUES, BY CROPS
TABLE 44 IMPORTANT PATHOGENS AS SEED TREATMENT TARGETS
TABLE 45 MAIZE/CORN: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 46 SOYBEAN: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 47 COTTON: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 48 WHEAT: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 49 POTATO: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 50 CANOLA: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 51 RICE: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 52 VEGETABLES: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENTS
TABLE 53 INSECTICIDE FAMILY, ACTIVE INGREDIENTS & TARGET PESTS
TABLE 54 NEMATICIDE COMPOUNDS & TARGET PESTS
TABLE 55 NORTH AMERICA SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP TYPES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 56 NORTH AMERICA SEED MARKET FOR CEREALS & GRAINS, BY CROP, 2011 – 2018($MILLION)
TABLE 57 NORTH AMERICA MAIZE MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONNES), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 58 GLOBAL MAIZE SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 59 NORTH AMERICA RICE MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONNES), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 60 GLOBAL RICE SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 61 NORTH AMERICAN WHEAT MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONNES), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 62 GLOBAL WHEAT SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 63 NORTH AMERICA SORGHUM MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONNES), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 64 GLOBAL OILSEEDS SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2008 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 65 NORTH AMERICA OILSEEDS SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 66 GLOBAL SOYBEAN MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONNES), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 67 GLOBAL SOYBEAN SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 68 NORTH AMERICA SUNFLOWER MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONNES), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 69 GLOBAL SULFLOWER SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 70 GLOBAL COTTON MARKET, PRODUCTION (TONNES), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 71 GLOBAL COTTON SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 72 NORTH AMERICA CANOLA MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 73 GLOBAL CANOLA SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 74 NORTH AMERICA OTHER CROPS SEED TREATMENT MARKET, REVENUES, BY CROP, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 75 NORTH AMERICA SUGAR BEETS MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 76 GLOBAL SUGAR BEET SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 77 NORTH AMERICA VEGETABLES MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2010 – 2011
TABLE 78 GLOBAL VEGETABLES SEED MARKET, BY CROP TYPES, 2008 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 79 TRAIT-UP COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS
TABLE 80 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 81 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 82 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY COUNTRIES, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 83 U.S: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 84 MEXICO: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 85 CANADA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
TABLE 86 MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2010 – MARCH 2013
TABLE 87 PARTNERSHIPS, COLLABORATIONS & AGREEMENTS, JANUARY 2010 – MARCH 2013
TABLE 88 EXPANSIONS, INVESTMENTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS, 2010 – 2013
TABLE 89 NEW PRODUCTS LAUNCH & RESEARCH, 2008 – 2011
TABLE 90 ABM: PRODUCT PORTFOLIO & ITS APPLICATIONS
TABLE 91 BRETTYOUNG: PRODUCT PORTFOLIO & DESCRIPTION
TABLE 92 CHEMTURA: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS, 2011 – 2012 ($MILLION)
TABLE 93 CHEMTURA: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2011 – 2012 ($MILLION)
TABLE 94 CHEMTURA CORP: PRODUCT PORTFOLIO, ACTIVE INGREDIENTS & TARGET SEED
TABLE 95 DUPONT: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS, 2011 – 2012 ($MILLION)
TABLE 96 DUPONT: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2011 – 2012 ($MILLION)
TABLE 97 DUPONT: PRODUCTS, ACTIVE INGREDIENTS & APPLICATIONS
TABLE 98 PIONEER: PRODUCTS & APPLICATIONS
TABLE 99 DUPONT: PRODUCT PORTFOLIO FOR SOYBEAN SEED TREATMENTS
TABLE 100 MONSANTO: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2011 – 2012 ($MILLION)
TABLE 101 MONSANTO: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2011 – 2012 ($MILLION)
TABLE 102 MONSANTO: SEED TREATMENT PRODUCT PORTFOLIO FOR SOYBEAN
TABLE 103 MONSANTO: PRODUCTS FOR COTTON & ITS APPLICATIONS
TABLE 104 MONSANTO: SEED TREATMENT PRODUCT PORTFOLIO FOR CORN
TABLE 105 VALENT: PRODUCT PORTFOLIO, ACTIVE INGREDIENT AND APPLICATIONS

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1 NORTH AMERICA SEED TREATMENT MARKET
FIGURE 2 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SEGMENTATION
FIGURE 3 SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY APPLICATOR
FIGURE 4 ELEMENTS OF COMMERCIAL SEED PRICE, 2012
FIGURE 5 GLOBAL SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2001 – 2010 ($BILLION)
FIGURE 6 EVOLUTION OF THE SEED TREATMENT MARKET
FIGURE 7 SEED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS – EVOLUTION
FIGURE 8 IMPACT OF MAJOR DRIVERS ON GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, 2011 – 2018
FIGURE 9 PRICE TRENDS MAIZE/CORN & SOYBEAN SEEDS, 2010
FIGURE 10 IMPACT OF MAJOR RESTRAINTS ON THE GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, 2011 – 2018
FIGURE 11 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2012
FIGURE 12 PATENT ANALYSIS, BY YEARS, 2010 – 2013
FIGURE 13 PATENT ANALYSIS, BY COMPANIES, 2010 – 2013
FIGURE 14 GLOBAL ORGANIC FOOD MARKET REVENUE, 2006 – 2010 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 15 STRESS EFFECT ON MAIZE PRODUCTION, 2010
FIGURE 16 NORTH AMERICAN CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2012
FIGURE 17 TRANSMISSION PATHWAYS FOR DISEASES & METHODS OF PROTECTION
FIGURE 18 NORTH AMERICA CROP PROTECTION MARKET SHARE, BY CROPS, 2012
FIGURE 19 NORTH AMERICA MAIZE/CORN SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 20 NORTH AMERICA RICE SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 21 NORTH AMERICA WHEAT SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 22 NORTH AMERICA SORGHUM SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 23 NORTH AMERICA SOYBEAN SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 24 NORTH AMERICA SUNFLOWER SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 25 NORTH AMERICAN COTTON SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 26 GLOBAL CANOLA SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 27 NORTH AMERICA SUGAR BEET SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 28 NORTH AMERICA VEGETABLES SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2011 – 2018 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 29 THE EVULATION OF PLANT BREEDING
FIGURE 30 RTDS – THE PROCESS
FIGURE 31 TRAIT-UP PROCEDURE
FIGURE 32 SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2012
FIGURE 33 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY COUNTRIES, 2012
FIGURE 34 NORTH AMERICA SEED MARKET GROWTH STRATEGIES, JANUARY 2010 – MARCH 2013
FIGURE 35 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET DEVELOPMENTS, JANUARY 2010 – MARCH 2013
FIGURE 36 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, JANUARY 2010 – MARCH 2013
FIGURE 37 AGREEMENTS, COLLABORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS, JANUARY 2010 – MARCH 2013
FIGURE 38 EXPANSIONS, INVESTMENTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS, 2010 – 2013
FIGURE 39 NEW PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY LAUNCHES, 2010 – 2013


More Publications