[email protected] +44 20 8123 2220 (UK) +1 732 587 5005 (US) Contact Us | FAQ |

PreK-12 Learning Management Systems: A Market Overview

November 2011 | 81 pages | ID: P0BFF064946EN
Simba Information

US$ 3,250.00

E-mail Delivery (PDF)

Download PDF Leaflet

Accepted cards
Wire Transfer
Checkout Later
Need Help? Ask a Question
As schools advance in the creation of digital learning environments, Simba Information brings its established analytics to this still-emerging technology area in the brand new report PreK-12 Learning Management Systems: A Market Overview.

The report examines the role of Learning Management Systems (LMSs), which already are beginning to reshape the delivery, management, and administration of educational content in the U.S. PreK-12 sector, enabling cost-savings, convenience, new more personalized pedagogical models, and new opportunities for system and content providers. To provide crucial market intelligence on this developing segment, Simba Information is partnering with leading education market research firm MCH Strategic Data to conduct a survey of public school- and district-level educators on their current use of and future plans for learning management systems.

Simba defines learning management systems as organizational software enabling the administration, tracking and reporting of student information across all types of educational activities; the delivery of courses; and the facilitation of collaboration and communication.
METHODOLOGY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CHAPTER 1: IMPLEMENTATION AND POLICY TRENDS

Introduction and Definition
Four Broad Classifications for Systems
LMS Functions Widely Implemented
  Implementation Continues in 2011-2012
Accountability, Digital Focus, Personalization Call for LMS Capabilities
  Looking Ahead with ESEA Reauthorization, Common Core State Standards
  States Step up with Digital Initiatives
Table 1.1: Grade Level Implementation of Learning Management Systems
Table 1.2: Duration of LMS Availability in Years

CHAPTER 2: MARKET DEMAND & COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

Introduction
Monitoring Student Progress Tops Uses of LMS
  Collaboration Tools Ranks High for Fewer Educators
Roseville (Calif.) Joint Union High School Districts: Move to Blended Learning
  Creating Courses, Finding Materials
Volusia (Fla.) County Schools: Professional Development Drives LMS Use
  Seeking Expertise, Compatible Course Materials
Forsyth County (Ga.) Schools: Investing in Innovation with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  Moving Materials Online
Majority of Districts Choose Outside Source for LMS
Moodle Captures 18.5% Share of PreK-12 LMS Market
Renaissance Place Is Top-Used Tool Similar to LMS
Table 2.1: Percentage of Districts with a Policy Promoting Use of an LMS
Table 2.2: Importance of Individual Features of a Learning Management System
Table 2.3: How Districts Acquired Their LMS
Table 2.4: PreK-12 Market Share of LMS Vendors, Fall 2011
Table 2.5: Districts’ Implementation of Tools with Functions Similar to an LMS

CHAPTER 3: CONCLUSIONS & OUTLOOK

Introduction
Educators Show Strong Impact of LMS
Policy in the Driver’s Seat
New Models: Blended Learning and Virtual Schools
  Broader Integration of Online Resources
Increase in Social Networking and Collaboration
Use of Open-Source Materials Increases
  Moodle: Open Source and Fast Growing
Budget Concerns Lead Hurdles to Adoption
  Support is Another Barrier
Keep it Simple: Single Sign-On, Interoperability Prized
  Desire2Learn Works on Single Sign-On
  Plato Learning Launches API to Expand Community
  Single Sign-On Remains a Goal
Varied District Needs Open Doors for “LMS Lite”
Schools Look for User-Friendliness and Interactivity
Schools Shop by Function Needs, Not Product Type
Vendors See Faster Growth Than Schools Do
LMS Segment Expected to Grow 7% in 2013
Table 3.1: Impact of Use of Digital Materials on Decision to Implement an LMS
Table 3.2: Impact of Implementation of Learning Management System on Use of Digital Materials, Tools and Courses
Table 3.3: Educators’ Views on Impact of LMS on Teaching and Learning
Table 3.4: Integration of Online Tools or Instructional Materials into Classroom Instruction
Table 3.5: Use of Online Classroom Assessment s and Quizzes
Table 3.6: Primary Reasons for Not Implementing an LMS
Table 3.7: Educators’ Views on Future LMS Implementation Plans
Table 3.8: LMS Sales in U.S. PreK-12 Market, 2011-2012 through 2014-2015

CHAPTER 4: WHO’S WHO

Blackboard
CompassLearning
Desire2Learn
Edmodo
GlobalScholar
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
It’s Learning
Learning.com
McGraw-Hill
Moodlerooms
Pearson
Plato Learning
Renaissance Learning
Schoology
Sophia Learning
STI

APPENDIX: SURVEY RESPONSE DETAIL


More Publications